Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of September 06, 2026

TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet: match statistics

TransMara Sugar crest
TransMara Sugar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
APS Bomet crest
APS Bomet
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

TransMara Sugar displays solid home form with a 33% win rate and 42% clean sheets at their stadium, averaging 0.83 goals scored and 0.75 conceded per game. The hosts hold a positive goal difference of +1 in home matches along with a possession advantage (51%). APS Bomet, on the other hand, struggles on the road with merely a 27% win rate, conceding an average of 1.55 goals per game and holding a negative goal difference of -2. The visitors' form is very poor - just 0.4 PPG in their last 5 matches, without a win in this period. Given the hosts' possession advantage, better home defense, and the visitors' poor away disposition, I predict a victory for TransMara Sugar, although it will not be an easy fixture due to the hosts' tendency to draw (25% in home games).

TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

TransMara Sugar played against APS Bomet in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

TransMara Sugar has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. APS Bomet has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

TransMara Sugar scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. APS Bomet scores 1.00 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.09 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 46% of TransMara Sugar's games and 58% of APS Bomet's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 46%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

TransMara Sugar has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.15 per game. TransMara Sugar takes 11.2 shots per game, while APS Bomet takes 7.1.

First-half and second-half trends

TransMara Sugar leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. APS Bomet leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.17 after halftime.

When the teams score

TransMara Sugar's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (18 goals). For APS Bomet, it is minutes 0-15 (19 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kenyan Premier League games average 2.09 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TransMara Sugar displays solid home form with a 33% win rate and 42% clean sheets at their stadium, averaging 0.83 goals scored and 0.75 conceded per game. The hosts hold a positive goal difference of +1 in home matches along with a possession advantage (51%). APS Bomet, on the other hand, struggles on the road with merely a 27% win rate, conceding an average of 1.55 goals per game and holding a negative goal difference of -2. The visitors' form is very poor - just 0.4 PPG in their last 5 matches, without a win in this period. Given the hosts' possession advantage, better home defense, and the visitors' poor away disposition, I predict a victory for TransMara Sugar, although it will not be an easy fixture due to the hosts' tendency to draw (25% in home games).

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
11Shots11
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0Shots on target0
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1.04xG1.06
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
6Corners5
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
46Dangerous attacks49
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
-1Fouls-1
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
-1Cards-1
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1Goals scored / game1
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1Goals allowed / game1.38
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
43%Average possession45%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
2.71Shots on target / game2.71
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.21Shots per game7.08
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
2.71Shots on target2.71
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8.9%Shot conversion14.1%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
43%Possession45%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1.55xG for1.15
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
1.55xG against1.4
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Shooting quality

TransMara Sugar: BalancedAPS Bomet: Counter-attacking
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
Accuracy (shots on target)24%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TransMara Sugar is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - TransMara Sugar · 0.4 pts / game - APS Bomet

TransMara Sugar
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-12-6
1.25 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
APS Bomet
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-12
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransMara Sugar is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - TransMara Sugar · 1.38 goals / game - APS Bomet

TransMara Sugar scoring profile: strong

TransMara Sugar scores in 58% of games (14 of 24 meczów), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).

APS Bomet scoring profile: strong

APS Bomet scores in 63% of games (15 of 24 meczów), while TransMara Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)24
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
24Goals conceded (season)33
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
2Average goals per game2.38
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8Goals scored (last 5)3
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal63%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
33%2 goals25%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8%3 goals8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%4 goals4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal79%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
21%2 goals38%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
13%3 goals13%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%4 goals8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%BTTS in both halves4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
4%Scored in both halves4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
80%BTTS - last 560%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

13%Min. 1 goal before half-time13%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

2nd half

25%Min. 1 goal after half-time29%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
8%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransMara Sugar - half-time state
0% leading92% draw8% trailing
APS Bomet - half-time state
0% leading92% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per game (1st half)0.92
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.04Goals scored (1st half)0.08
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.21Average goals (1st half)0.29
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
88%Clean sheet before half-time88%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
96%No goal before half-time92%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)0.92
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
0.42Average goals (2nd half)0.46
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
88%Clean sheet after half-time75%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet
83%No goal after half-time83%
TransMara SugarAPS Bomet

TransMara Sugar - second-half results

13% W79% R8% P
22
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

APS Bomet - second-half results

4% W79% R17% P
22
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

TransMara Sugar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
APS Bomet - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

TransMara Sugar
ScoredConceded
18
17
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (18 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

APS Bomet
ScoredConceded
19
25
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (19 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (25). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

TransMara Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 75% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

APS Bomet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 79% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TransMara SugarLigaAPS Bomet
Average goals per game 2.002.09 2.38
Both teams scored 46%47% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 46%
Clean sheets 33%33% 21%
Goal before half-time 13%23% 13%
Goal after half-time 25%25% 29%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.05
Home goals / game
1.04
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
23%
1 goal
9%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
25%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from TransMara Sugar's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against APS Bomet. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished TransMara Sugar 0:0 APS Bomet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet?

TransMara Sugar score 1.00 goals per game on average and APS Bomet 1.00. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 46% of TransMara Sugar's matches and 58% of APS Bomet's.

What form are TransMara Sugar and APS Bomet in?

Over the last 5 games TransMara Sugar have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and APS Bomet 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet?

The statistical background for TransMara Sugar vs APS Bomet — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.