Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 19 July 2026

TransMara Sugar vs Sofapaka: match statistics

TransMara Sugar crest
TransMara Sugar
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Sofapaka crest
Sofapaka
140%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

The match is shaping up to be a close encounter between two teams in poor form. TransMara Sugar have a slightly better home record (20% wins, 30% draws), but they have not won any of their last 5 overall matches, averaging just 0.4 points per game. Sofapaka show an even weaker away form (22% wins, 67% losses) and have also failed to win any of their last 5 matches. Both teams struggle with efficiency - the hosts fail to score in 70% of their home games, while the visitors fail to score in 67% of their away matches. The xG metrics are similar (0.79 vs 0.68), suggesting comparable offensive potential. Considering both teams' poor form, high FTS% rates, and the fact that both sides have drawn twice in their last 5 matches, the most likely outcome is a share of the points, although the hosts have a slight home advantage.

TransMara Sugar vs Sofapaka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

TransMara Sugar play Sofapaka in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 14 February 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

TransMara Sugar: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Sofapaka: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

TransMara Sugar scores 0.93 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Sofapaka scores 0.54 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: TransMara Sugar 39%, Sofapaka 25%. Over 2.5: TransMara Sugar 29%, Sofapaka 25%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

TransMara Sugar has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.35. TransMara Sugar: 11.3 shots per match, Sofapaka: 9.4.

Match halves

TransMara Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.21. Sofapaka: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.18.

Goals by minute

TransMara Sugar: 0-15 (20 goals). Sofapaka: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The match is shaping up to be a close encounter between two teams in poor form. TransMara Sugar have a slightly better home record (20% wins, 30% draws), but they have not won any of their last 5 overall matches, averaging just 0.4 points per game. Sofapaka show an even weaker away form (22% wins, 67% losses) and have also failed to win any of their last 5 matches. Both teams struggle with efficiency - the hosts fail to score in 70% of their home games, while the visitors fail to score in 67% of their away matches. The xG metrics are similar (0.79 vs 0.68), suggesting comparable offensive potential. Considering both teams' poor form, high FTS% rates, and the fact that both sides have drawn twice in their last 5 matches, the most likely outcome is a share of the points, although the hosts have a slight home advantage.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
TransMara SugarSofapaka
20Shots13
TransMara SugarSofapaka
6Shots on target3
TransMara SugarSofapaka
2.13xG1.34
TransMara SugarSofapaka
4Corners0
TransMara SugarSofapaka
61Dangerous attacks41
TransMara SugarSofapaka
-1Fouls-1
TransMara SugarSofapaka
-1Cards-1
TransMara SugarSofapaka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.93Goals scored / match0.54
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.89Goals conceded / match1.29
TransMara SugarSofapaka
44%Average possession46%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
2.68Shots on target / match3.32
TransMara SugarSofapaka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match9.43
TransMara SugarSofapaka
2.68Shots on target3.32
TransMara SugarSofapaka
8.3%Shot conversion5.7%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
44%Possession46%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
1.54xG for1.35
TransMara SugarSofapaka
1.51xG against1.52
TransMara SugarSofapaka

Shooting quality

TransMara Sugar: BalancedSofapaka: Balanced
TransMara SugarSofapaka
Accuracy (shots on target)24%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.16

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TransMara Sugar is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - TransMara Sugar · 0.6 pts / match - Sofapaka

TransMara Sugar
DDLWW
Season result split
29% W46% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-13-7
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Sofapaka
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W29% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-17
0.61 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransMara Sugar is 72% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - TransMara Sugar · 0.54 goals / match - Sofapaka

TransMara Sugar is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - TransMara Sugar · 1.29 goals / match - Sofapaka

TransMara Sugar scoring profile: strong

TransMara Sugar scores in 57% of matches (16 of 28 matches), while Sofapaka keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

Sofapaka scoring profile: more difficult

Sofapaka scores in 32% of matches (9 of 28 matches), while TransMara Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).

26Goals scored (season)15
TransMara SugarSofapaka
25Goals conceded (season)36
TransMara SugarSofapaka
1.82Average goals in match1.82
TransMara SugarSofapaka
2Goals scored (last 5)0
TransMara SugarSofapaka
1Goals conceded (last 5)3
TransMara SugarSofapaka

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal32%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
29%2 goals18%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
7%3 goals4%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0%4 goals0%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal75%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
18%2 goals39%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
11%3 goals14%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0%4 goals0%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time4%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
4%Scored in both halves7%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0%BTTS - last 50%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

11%Min. 1 goal before half-time29%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

2nd half

21%Min. 1 goal after half-time21%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
7%Min. 2 goals after half-time7%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sofapaka is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - TransMara Sugar · 1.07 pts / match - Sofapaka

TransMara Sugar - half-time state
0% leading93% draw7% trailing
Sofapaka - half-time state
11% leading75% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.07
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.04Goals scored (1st half)0.18
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.18Average goals (1st half)0.39
TransMara SugarSofapaka
89%Clean sheet before half-time82%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
96%No goal before half-time86%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.04
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.18
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.18
TransMara SugarSofapaka
0.36Average goals (2nd half)0.36
TransMara SugarSofapaka
89%Clean sheet after half-time86%
TransMara SugarSofapaka
86%No goal after half-time89%
TransMara SugarSofapaka

TransMara Sugar - second-half results

11% W82% R7% P
26
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sofapaka - second-half results

7% W82% R11% P
30
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TransMara Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Sofapaka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

TransMara Sugar
ScoredConceded
20
18
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (20 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Sofapaka
ScoredConceded
7
28
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (28). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+120%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
18%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
29%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

TransMara Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 77% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Sofapaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TransMara SugarLigaSofapaka
Average goals in match 1.822.01 1.82
Both teams scored 39%43% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%33% 25%
Clean sheets 39%36% 25%
Goal before half-time 11%21% 29%
Goal after half-time 21%22% 21%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: TransMara Sugar 0 - 1 - 0 Sofapaka. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Sofapaka FC
2 : 2
TransMara Sugar FC

FAQ

What was the result of TransMara Sugar vs Sofapaka?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished TransMara Sugar 3:1 Sofapaka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before TransMara Sugar vs Sofapaka?

TransMara Sugar score 0.93 goals per game on average and Sofapaka 0.54. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 39% of TransMara Sugar's matches and 25% of Sofapaka's.

What form are TransMara Sugar and Sofapaka in?

Over the last 5 games TransMara Sugar have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Sofapaka 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransMara Sugar vs Sofapaka?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TransMara Sugar vs Sofapaka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.