Trapani 1905 vs Siracusa: match statistics
Trapani 1905 vs Siracusa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Trapani 1905 played against Siracusa in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Trapani 1905 has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Siracusa has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Trapani 1905 scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.41. Siracusa scores 1.24 and allows 1.49. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Trapani 1905's games and 62% of Siracusa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 54%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Siracusa has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.29 per game. Trapani 1905 takes 10.2 shots per game, while Siracusa takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Trapani 1905 leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Siracusa leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Trapani 1905's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Siracusa, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Trapani has a 50% win rate in home matches, while Siracusa wins only 6% of away games, giving a clear home advantage. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals per home match, while the visitors average just 0.72 away; additionally Trapani converts 15% of shots versus Siracusa's 7%. Trapani averages 4.33 shots on target and 11.33 shots per home game compared to Siracusa's 2.56 on target and 10.33 shots away, and the hosts’ xG is 1.42 versus the visitors’ 1.26 xG, indicating higher quality chances for the home side. Trapani’s defense concedes an average of 1.22 goals in home matches, while Siracusa concedes 1.67 goals away and has 0% clean sheets on the road versus the hosts’ 28%, so the defensive edge also favors Trapani. Although in the last 5 matches Trapani have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (4 scored, 6 conceded), and Siracusa 1-3-1 (7 scored, 7 conceded), I predict a home win and estimate probabilities: 70% Trapani win, 18% draw, 12% Siracusa win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS - Yes with a 75% probability. Both teams have strong statistical grounds for both teams to score: Trapani has a season BTTS rate of 68%, Siracusa 56%, while the league average is 51%. This season Trapani scores 1.74 and concedes 1.32, and Siracusa scores 0.72 and concedes 1.67, indicating the home side can create goals while the visitors often concede. In the last 5 matches Siracusa has 80% BTTS with average xG 1.75 versus opponent xG 0.93, and Trapani has 60% BTTS with xG 1.27 and opponent xG 1.54, so both teams are creating and allowing chances in the short term. Additionally, Trapani generates 14.26 shots and 5.26 on target with a seasonal xG of 1.74, and Siracusa has 0% clean sheets this season, which increases the likelihood both teams will score; hence the 'yes' selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Trapani at home scores an average of 1.74 goals per game (xG 1.74) and averages 14.26 shots with 5.26 on target, while Siracusa has 0.72 goals scored with xG 1.26 and only 2.56 shots on target, indicating a gap in chance creation and finishing. Based on xG I expect about 1.46 goals for Trapani ((1.74+1.17)/2) and 1.19 for Siracusa ((1.26+1.11)/2), totaling 2.65 goals in the match. Seasonal percentages confirm a tendency for goals: Trapani has 84% of matches over 1.5 goals, Siracusa 72%, and both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal (over 0.5 = 100%), which strongly supports Over 1.5. I rate Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~54%) because Trapani has 68% of matches >2.5 and Siracusa 39%, while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~30%) given seasonal values of 37% and 22%. Best line to play is Over 1.5 — this is the strongest signal (on average 78%) consistent with the expected 2.65 goals and Trapani’s clear advantage in chance creation (5.26 SOT vs 2.56).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select X/1 (draw at half-time, home win) because Trapani most often find themselves level after 45 minutes — the hosts are drawing at half-time in 42% of matches, with 32% leading and 26% trailing. Trapani dominate after the break: on average they score 1.0 goals in the second half versus Siracusa’s 0.44, and the hosts win the second half in 53% of fixtures compared to 11% for the visitors. Season metrics confirm Trapani’s advantage: xG 1.74 versus 1.26, 5.26 shots on target versus 2.56 and a conversion rate of 12% vs 7%, which increases the likelihood of a goal after the break. On this basis I assigned X/1 the highest probability at 27%, followed by 1/1 at 19% as an alternative when Trapani are already leading at half-time, and 2/2 at 16% as the main downside risk if the visitors maintain a lead in situations where the hosts are trailing at the break (26% of cases).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Trapani 1905 | Siracusa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Siracusa is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Trapani 1905 · 1.2 pts / game - Siracusa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Trapani 1905 is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.41 goals / game - Trapani 1905 · 1.49 goals / game - Siracusa
Trapani 1905 scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while Siracusa keeps a clean sheet in 5% (2 of 37 meczów).
Siracusa scores in 68% of games (25 of 37 meczów), while Trapani 1905 keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Trapani 1905
Over / Under - Siracusa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Trapani 1905 is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Trapani 1905 · 1.16 pts / game - Siracusa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Trapani 1905 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Siracusa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Trapani 1905
Siracusa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Trapani 1905 | Liga | Siracusa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.62 | 2.46 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 51% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 46% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 29% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 66% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 79% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Trapani 1905's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Siracusa. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Trapani 1905 vs Siracusa?
The Serie C Group C match finished Trapani 1905 2:2 Siracusa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Trapani 1905 vs Siracusa?
Trapani 1905 score 1.22 goals per game on average and Siracusa 1.24. The Serie C Group C average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Trapani 1905's matches and 62% of Siracusa's.
What form are Trapani 1905 and Siracusa in?
Over the last 5 games Trapani 1905 have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Siracusa 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Trapani 1905 vs Siracusa?
The statistical background for Trapani 1905 vs Siracusa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


