Triglav vs Dekani: match statistics
Triglav vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Triglav played against Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on May 6, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Triglav has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Dekani has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Triglav scores 2.62 goals per game and allows 0.88. Dekani scores 1.12 and allows 1.46. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Triglav's games and 50% of Dekani's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Triglav has the higher season xG average, 1.94 to 1.28 per game. Triglav takes 14.7 shots per game, while Dekani takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Triglav leads at halftime in 54% of its games and scores 1.42 goals per game after halftime. Dekani leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.54 after halftime.
When the teams score
Triglav's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Dekani, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. SNL games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 7.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Triglav is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the league versus Dekani’s 10th and have scored 68 goals this season compared to the opponents’ 29. Triglav’s form is excellent — 5 wins in the last 5 matches and 12 goals in that period, while Dekani have only 1 win and 4 goals in their last 5. At home Triglav averages 3.00 goals with 6.69 shots on target and a conversion rate of 19%, whereas Dekani away average 0.69 goals, 3.31 shots on target, roughly 7% conversion and 54% of matches without a goal, indicating the hosts’ superiority in quality of chances and efficiency. Defensively the hosts concede 0.85 goals at home on average and keep 38% clean sheets, while Dekani concede 1.46 away with 8% clean sheets; Triglav’s edge is also reflected in xG — 2.12 at home versus 1.32 xG For Dekani away. Based on this I propose probability estimates: Triglav win 78%, draw 12% and Dekani win 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis indicates a higher probability of No BTTS: Triglav in the last 5 matches averages 2.4 goals scored and concedes 0.2, while Dekani in the last 5 averages 0.8 scored and concedes 1.6. Seasonally Triglav at home has 1.54 goals per match and a shot conversion rate of 18%, whereas Dekani away has only 0.69 goals per match and a 7% conversion, which strongly favors the home side in finishing. xG data show Dekani generates xG 1.32 versus Triglav 1.24, but Dekani actually scores only 0.69 goals with xG 1.32 — clearly underperforming in finishing. Historically BTTS for Triglav at home is 54% and for Dekani away 46%, however in the last 5 matches Triglav had only 20% BTTS and Dekani 40%, suggesting a trend toward matches where the visitors don’t score. Considering Triglav’s form (5 wins), the goal difference over the last 5 (Triglav 12 scored vs Dekani 4), and superior home efficiency, I assess BTTS - Yes at 25% and No BTTS at 75%; therefore I recommend the 'No' (No BTTS) bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I back Over 1.5 as the best option: expected goals are 1.36 for Triglav and 1.27 for Dekani, totaling 2.63 goals. Triglav scores on average 1.54 goals per match and has 68 goals this season; in the last 5 matches they scored 12 goals (avg. 2.4) and conceded only 1 (avg. 0.2), with xG 1.24 and a shot conversion rate of 18%. Dekani have a significantly weaker offense: 0.69 goals per match (29 this season), 4 goals in the last 5 (avg. 0.8) and 8 conceded (avg. 1.6), and their xG against is 1.47, indicating susceptibility to conceding. Season-long Over1.5 percentages are 85% for Triglav and 77% for Dekani, while Over2.5 is mixed (69% vs 31%), so I assign Over1.5 a high stake of 84%, Over2.5 a moderate 60% and Over3.5 a low 20%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Triglav has a clear offensive advantage: they score an average of 1.54 goals per match versus Dekani's 0.69, and the home side's shot conversion rate is 18% compared to 7% for the visitors, indicating greater efficiency in turning chances into goals. Form confirms this gap — Triglav won 5 of their last 5 matches (100%), while Dekani have only 1 win in 5 (20%); additionally the hosts led at the break in 60% of those 5 games, versus 0% for the visitors. At half-time Triglav averages 0.77 goals and Dekani 0.38, and 77% of the hosts’ matches have at least one goal by the break (versus 69% for the visitors), so a scenario with the home team leading after 45 minutes is favoured. Although the visitors’ xG is 1.32 versus the hosts’ 1.24, Dekani do not convert that into goals (actual 0.69), therefore I expect Triglav to maintain their advantage and for the home side to win. On that basis I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time scenario (46%), with realistic alternatives being X/1 (16%) and X/X (14%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Triglav | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Triglav is 200% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Triglav · 1 pts / game - Dekani
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 134% better for: goals scored per game.
2.62 goals / game - Triglav · 1.12 goals / game - Dekani
Triglav is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - Triglav · 1.46 goals / game - Dekani
Triglav scores in 85% of games (22 of 26 meczów), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 meczów).
Dekani scores in 62% of games (16 of 26 meczów), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (13 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Triglav
Over / Under - Dekani
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.88 pts / game - Triglav · 1.08 pts / game - Dekani
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 54% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Dekani - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Triglav
Dekani
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Triglav | Liga | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.50 | 2.80 | ▼ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 29% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 74% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 80% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- TriglavGoalLucas Mačak
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Triglav's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Dekani. Games average 7.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Triglav vs Dekani?
The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 2:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Dekani?
Triglav score 2.62 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.12. The 2. SNL average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Triglav's matches and 50% of Dekani's.
What form are Triglav and Dekani in?
Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Dekani 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Dekani?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.