Triglav vs Dekani: match statistics
Triglav vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Triglav play Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Triglav 37%, Dekani 53%. Over 2.5: Triglav 57%, Dekani 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.32. Triglav: 14.0 shots per match, Dekani: 9.4.
Match halves
Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33. Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Triglav is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the league versus Dekani’s 10th and have scored 68 goals this season compared to the opponents’ 29. Triglav’s form is excellent — 5 wins in the last 5 matches and 12 goals in that period, while Dekani have only 1 win and 4 goals in their last 5. At home Triglav averages 3.00 goals with 6.69 shots on target and a conversion rate of 19%, whereas Dekani away average 0.69 goals, 3.31 shots on target, roughly 7% conversion and 54% of matches without a goal, indicating the hosts’ superiority in quality of chances and efficiency. Defensively the hosts concede 0.85 goals at home on average and keep 38% clean sheets, while Dekani concede 1.46 away with 8% clean sheets; Triglav’s edge is also reflected in xG — 2.12 at home versus 1.32 xG For Dekani away. Based on this I propose probability estimates: Triglav win 78%, draw 12% and Dekani win 10%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Triglav | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Triglav is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Triglav · 1.6 pts / match - Dekani
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
2.4 goals / match - Triglav · 1.33 goals / match - Dekani
Triglav is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Triglav · 1.53 goals / match - Dekani
Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Triglav
Over / Under — Dekani
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / match - Triglav · 1.07 pts / match - Dekani
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Dekani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Triglav
Dekani
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Triglav | Liga | Dekani | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 2.82 | • 2.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | • 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 28% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Triglav 1 - 0 - 0 Dekani. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Triglav vs Dekani?
The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 2:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Dekani?
Triglav score 2.40 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.33. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Triglav's matches and 53% of Dekani's.
What form are Triglav and Dekani in?
Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Dekani 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Dekani?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.