Triglav vs Dravinja: match statistics
Triglav vs Dravinja: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Triglav play Dravinja in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Dravinja: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Dravinja scores 1.07 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Triglav 37%, Dravinja 53%. Over 2.5: Triglav 57%, Dravinja 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.38. Triglav: 14.0 shots per match, Dravinja: 9.6.
Match halves
Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33. Dravinja: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). Dravinja: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Triglav clearly dominates the league and at home: they are 4th with a 14-3-5 record this season and 58 goals scored; Dravinja have 21 goals and sit 13th (5-5-12). The hosts’ form is markedly superior — Triglav scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches and are averaging 2.6 points per game over that span, while Dravinja have 4 goals and average 1.0 points (1-2-2). At home Triglav averages 16.18 shots per match, 6.55 on target, 56% possession and a 19% conversion rate; Dravinja away average 10.36 shots, 3.73 on target, 41% possession and 10% conversion. Defensively the hosts are better as well — Triglav concede 0.91 goals per home game and keep clean sheets in 36% of matches, whereas Dravinja concede 1.82 goals away and have only 9% clean sheets; the visitors fail to score in 45% of their away matches, while Triglav are shut out in 18% of home games. Considering the xG advantage (2.14 for the hosts vs 1.37 for the visitors), superior efficiency and form, I predict a Triglav win; probabilities estimated at 75% home, 15% draw and 10% away.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Triglav | Dravinja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dravinja is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Triglav · 2.6 pts / match - Dravinja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 124% better for: goals scored per match.
2.4 goals / match - Triglav · 1.07 goals / match - Dravinja
Triglav is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Triglav · 1.47 goals / match - Dravinja
Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Dravinja keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
Dravinja scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Triglav
Over / Under — Dravinja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / match - Triglav · 1.07 pts / match - Dravinja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Dravinja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Triglav
Dravinja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Triglav | Liga | Dravinja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 28% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Triglav 1 - 0 - 0 Dravinja. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Triglav vs Dravinja?
The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 2:1 Dravinja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Dravinja?
Triglav score 2.40 goals per game on average and Dravinja 1.07. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Triglav's matches and 53% of Dravinja's.
What form are Triglav and Dravinja in?
Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Dravinja 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Dravinja?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.