Slovenia - 2. SNLŠportni Center Stanko MlakarData current as of October 18, 2026

Triglav vs Jesenice: match statistics

Triglav crest
Triglav
4 : 0half-time 1:0
Jesenice crest
Jesenice

Triglav vs Jesenice: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Triglav played against Jesenice in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on October 4, 2026. Venue: Športni Center Stanko Mlakar. Final score: 4:0.

Recent form

Triglav has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Jesenice has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Triglav scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 0.63. Jesenice scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 25% of Triglav's games and 38% of Jesenice's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 50%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Triglav has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.68 per game. Triglav takes 13.4 shots per game, while Jesenice takes 13.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Triglav leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Jesenice leads at halftime in 63% and scores 1.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Triglav's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Jesenice, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

2. SNL games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Triglav have won 3 of their 4 home matches and remain unbeaten on their own ground, while Jesenice have won 2 of their 3 away games. The hosts average 2.25 goals at home, compared with the visitors’ 1.33 goals per away match, and lead in shots on target by 7 to 4.33 per game. Triglav have also impressed defensively, conceding an average of 0.25 goals at home and keeping a clean sheet in 75% of their matches, although their opponents’ xG of 1.74 suggests that maintaining such defensive efficiency could prove difficult. Jesenice have won 4 of their last 5 matches, compared with Triglav’s 3 wins, so their form gives them a genuine chance of an upset. Even so, the hosts’ superior efficiency and goalscoring record at home point to a home win (1).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is that both teams have not scored in any of the away side’s matches so far, while this has happened in 60% of the home side’s matches. Jesenice have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches, compared with 20% for Triglav, making a scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely. In their last 5 matches, the teams conceded an average of just 0.8 and 0.6 goals, further reducing the chances of both sides scoring. The risk to this pick lies in their attacking potential: Triglav and Jesenice average 1.93 and 1.41 xG respectively, so the edge for BTTS - No is not decisive.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 100% of both Triglav’s home matches and Jesenice’s away matches, although the sample sizes are small. Triglav average 2.4 goals scored at home and record 6.2 shots on target per match, giving them clear potential to score at least twice. However, caution is warranted with higher lines: Triglav have gone Over 2.5 goals in 80% of their home matches, while Jesenice have not done so in any of their away matches and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of games. xG also points to a more balanced picture than the results alone: Triglav average 1.93 at home, while Jesenice average 1.41 away. Therefore, the 2.70-goal prediction supports Over 1.5, but does not provide equally strong grounds for backing Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely outcome is Triglav leading at the break and holding on to that lead until the final whistle, although the hosts’ advantage is not clear-cut. In their last five matches, Triglav led at half-time three times and did not concede in the first half on any occasion, strengthening the case for an early lead. The hosts also have a higher average xG (1.93 versus 1.41) and more shots on target per match (6.2 versus 4.33), giving them greater potential to build an advantage. They score an average of 1.6 goals after the break, which supports the prospect of maintaining or extending their lead. However, Jesenice have won four of their last five matches and average 1.8 goals after half-time, so the 1/1 HT/FT outcome remains only a moderate favorite.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
TriglavJesenice
19Shots12
TriglavJesenice
13Shots on target2
TriglavJesenice
2.51xG1.19
TriglavJesenice
8Corners1
TriglavJesenice
55Dangerous attacks40
TriglavJesenice
13Fouls16
TriglavJesenice
0Cards0
TriglavJesenice

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.75Goals scored / game2
TriglavJesenice
0.63Goals allowed / game1
TriglavJesenice
49%Average possession49%
TriglavJesenice
5.75Shots on target / game5.25
TriglavJesenice

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.38Shots per game13.63
TriglavJesenice
5.75Shots on target5.25
TriglavJesenice
13.1%Shot conversion14.7%
TriglavJesenice
49%Possession49%
TriglavJesenice
1.73xG for1.68
TriglavJesenice
1.63xG against1.51
TriglavJesenice

Shooting quality

Triglav: Efficient finishingJesenice: Efficient finishing
TriglavJesenice
Accuracy (shots on target)43%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Jesenice is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Triglav · 2.4 pts / game - Jesenice

Triglav
WLWWD
Season result split
63% W13% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-2
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Jesenice
WLWWW
Season result split
63% W13% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-2
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Jesenice is 14% better for: goals scored per game.

1.75 goals / game - Triglav · 2 goals / game - Jesenice

Triglav is 59% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.63 goals / game - Triglav · 1 goals / game - Jesenice

Triglav scoring profile: strong

Triglav scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).

Jesenice scoring profile: strong

Jesenice scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 games).

14Goals scored (season)16
TriglavJesenice
5Goals conceded (season)8
TriglavJesenice
2.38Average goals per game3
TriglavJesenice
9Goals scored (last 5)13
TriglavJesenice
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
TriglavJesenice

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
TriglavJesenice
38%2 goals63%
TriglavJesenice
38%3 goals38%
TriglavJesenice
25%4 goals13%
TriglavJesenice

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal63%
TriglavJesenice
13%2 goals25%
TriglavJesenice
0%3 goals13%
TriglavJesenice
0%4 goals0%
TriglavJesenice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
TriglavJesenice
0%BTTS in both halves0%
TriglavJesenice
38%Scored in both halves50%
TriglavJesenice

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
TriglavJesenice
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
TriglavJesenice
20%BTTS - last 540%
TriglavJesenice

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

38%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
TriglavJesenice
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
TriglavJesenice
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
TriglavJesenice

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
TriglavJesenice
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
TriglavJesenice
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
TriglavJesenice

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jesenice is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Triglav · 2 pts / game - Jesenice

Triglav - half-time state
25% leading75% draw0% trailing
Jesenice - half-time state
63% leading13% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)2
TriglavJesenice
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.75
TriglavJesenice
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
TriglavJesenice
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.25
TriglavJesenice
88%Clean sheet before half-time63%
TriglavJesenice
63%No goal before half-time38%
TriglavJesenice

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)1.88
TriglavJesenice
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
TriglavJesenice
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
TriglavJesenice
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.75
TriglavJesenice
63%Clean sheet after half-time50%
TriglavJesenice
25%No goal after half-time38%
TriglavJesenice

Triglav - second-half results

63% W13% D25% L
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Jesenice - second-half results

63% W0% D38% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Triglav - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Jesenice - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.40
Goals scored / game0.81.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Triglav
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
5
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
3
3
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Jesenice
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Triglav

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Jesenice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

TriglavLigaJesenice
Average goals per game▼ 2.382.96• 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 25%47%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%57%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%31%▲ 38%
Goal before half-time▼ 38%73%▲ 88%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%79%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+36%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Triglav's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Jesenice. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

NK Jesenice
0 : 3
NK Triglav Kranj
NK Triglav Kranj
6 : 0
NK Jesenice

FAQ

What was the result of Triglav vs Jesenice?

The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 4:0 Jesenice. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Triglav and Jesenice?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Triglav won 2, Jesenice won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Jesenice?

Triglav score 1.75 goals per game on average and Jesenice 2.00. The 2. SNL average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Triglav's matches and 38% of Jesenice's.

What form are Triglav and Jesenice in?

Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Jesenice 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Jesenice?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.