Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 22 July 2026

Triglav vs Rudar: match statistics

Triglav crest
Triglav
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Rudar crest
Rudar
165%(1.56)
X20%(3.90)
215%(5.20)

Triglav demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts have won 50% of their home matches with an impressive average of 3.1 goals per game and a goal difference of +21. In their last five overall matches, they remain undefeated (3 wins, 2 draws) with a PPG of 2.2. Rudar, on the other hand, struggles on the road – they lose half of their away matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and scoring only 1.5 goals per game. The visitors' form in their last five matches is very poor (PPG 0.8, only 1 win). Triglav's high efficiency (19% shot conversion), possession advantage (57%), and significantly better xG metrics (2.1 vs 1.19) further confirm the hosts' clear advantage.

Triglav vs Rudar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Triglav play Rudar in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 27 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Triglav: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Rudar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Triglav scores 2.40 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Rudar scores 1.53 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Triglav 37%, Rudar 53%. Over 2.5: Triglav 57%, Rudar 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Triglav has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.51. Triglav: 14.0 shots per match, Rudar: 10.4.

Match halves

Triglav: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33. Rudar: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Triglav: 76-90+ (17 goals). Rudar: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Triglav demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts have won 50% of their home matches with an impressive average of 3.1 goals per game and a goal difference of +21. In their last five overall matches, they remain undefeated (3 wins, 2 draws) with a PPG of 2.2. Rudar, on the other hand, struggles on the road – they lose half of their away matches, conceding an average of 1.6 goals and scoring only 1.5 goals per game. The visitors' form in their last five matches is very poor (PPG 0.8, only 1 win). Triglav's high efficiency (19% shot conversion), possession advantage (57%), and significantly better xG metrics (2.1 vs 1.19) further confirm the hosts' clear advantage.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
TriglavRudar
15Shots10
TriglavRudar
7Shots on target1
TriglavRudar
2.38xG1.28
TriglavRudar
11Corners1
TriglavRudar
131Dangerous attacks79
TriglavRudar
14Fouls12
TriglavRudar
0Cards0
TriglavRudar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.4Goals scored / match1.53
TriglavRudar
0.93Goals conceded / match1.3
TriglavRudar
57%Average possession50%
TriglavRudar
5.73Shots on target / match4.4
TriglavRudar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.03Shots per match10.37
TriglavRudar
5.73Shots on target4.4
TriglavRudar
17.1%Shot conversion14.8%
TriglavRudar
57%Possession50%
TriglavRudar
1.85xG for1.51
TriglavRudar
1.27xG against1.5
TriglavRudar

Shooting quality

Triglav: DominantRudar: Efficient finishing
TriglavRudar
Accuracy (shots on target)41%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Triglav is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Triglav · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar

Triglav
WWWLD
Season result split
67% W13% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-4-6
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +44
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-4
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Rudar
WWLDL
Season result split
30% W33% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Triglav is 57% better for: goals scored per match.

2.4 goals / match - Triglav · 1.53 goals / match - Rudar

Triglav is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Triglav · 1.3 goals / match - Rudar

Triglav scoring profile: very strong

Triglav scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

Rudar scoring profile: mixed

Rudar scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).

72Goals scored (season)46
TriglavRudar
28Goals conceded (season)39
TriglavRudar
3.33Average goals in match2.83
TriglavRudar
7Goals scored (last 5)9
TriglavRudar
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
TriglavRudar

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal70%
TriglavRudar
63%2 goals47%
TriglavRudar
40%3 goals20%
TriglavRudar
27%4 goals10%
TriglavRudar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal70%
TriglavRudar
27%2 goals43%
TriglavRudar
10%3 goals13%
TriglavRudar
7%4 goals3%
TriglavRudar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
TriglavRudar
7%BTTS in both halves7%
TriglavRudar
53%Scored in both halves20%
TriglavRudar

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
TriglavRudar
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
TriglavRudar
20%BTTS - last 560%
TriglavRudar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
TriglavRudar
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
TriglavRudar
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
TriglavRudar

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
TriglavRudar
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
TriglavRudar
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
TriglavRudar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Triglav is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Triglav · 1.4 pts / match - Rudar

Triglav - half-time state
50% leading30% draw20% trailing
Rudar - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)1.4
TriglavRudar
1.07Goals scored (1st half)0.73
TriglavRudar
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
TriglavRudar
1.53Average goals (1st half)1.3
TriglavRudar
63%Clean sheet before half-time57%
TriglavRudar
37%No goal before half-time57%
TriglavRudar

After half-time (2nd half)

2.03Points per match (2nd half)1.17
TriglavRudar
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
TriglavRudar
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
TriglavRudar
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.4
TriglavRudar
63%Clean sheet after half-time50%
TriglavRudar
27%No goal after half-time57%
TriglavRudar

Triglav - second-half results

63% W13% R23% P
54
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+26
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Triglav - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Triglav
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
13
8
16-30
12
3
31-45
8
4
46-60
15
2
61-75
17
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
9
8
16-30
9
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
10
7
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Triglav

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

TriglavLigaRudar
Average goals in match 3.332.82 2.83
Both teams scored 37%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%54% 60%
Clean sheets 50%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 80%74% 67%
Goal after half-time 93%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Triglav 1 - 0 - 0 Rudar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
0 : 3
NK Triglav Kranj

FAQ

What was the result of Triglav vs Rudar?

The 2. SNL match finished Triglav 2:0 Rudar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Triglav vs Rudar?

Triglav score 2.40 goals per game on average and Rudar 1.53. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Triglav's matches and 53% of Rudar's.

What form are Triglav and Rudar in?

Over the last 5 games Triglav have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Rudar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Triglav vs Rudar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Triglav vs Rudar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.