Troszyn vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Troszyn played against Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on November 29, 2025. Final score: 5:0.

Recent form

Troszyn has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Swit has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Troszyn scores 2.22 goals per game and allows 1.83. Swit scores 1.72 and allows 1.72. Games in this league average 3.46 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 83% of Troszyn's games and 61% of Swit's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 72%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Troszyn has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.29 per game. Troszyn takes 7.6 shots per game, while Swit takes 6.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Troszyn leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. Swit leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.94 after halftime.

When the teams score

Troszyn's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Swit, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.46 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
TroszynSwit
-1Shots-1
TroszynSwit
-1Shots on target-1
TroszynSwit
0xG0
TroszynSwit
-1Corners-1
TroszynSwit
0Dangerous attacks0
TroszynSwit
-1Fouls-1
TroszynSwit
-1Cards-1
TroszynSwit

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.22Goals scored / game1.72
TroszynSwit
1.83Goals allowed / game1.72
TroszynSwit
28%Average possession38%
TroszynSwit
3.22Shots on target / game2.72
TroszynSwit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.61Shots per game6.61
TroszynSwit
3.22Shots on target2.72
TroszynSwit
29.2%Shot conversion26.1%
TroszynSwit
28%Possession38%
TroszynSwit
1.76xG for1.29
TroszynSwit
1.28xG against1.55
TroszynSwit

Shooting quality

Troszyn: Counter-attackingSwit: Counter-attacking
TroszynSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)42%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.690.63

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Troszyn is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Troszyn · 1 pts / game - Swit

Troszyn
WDWWL
Season result split
33% W22% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-8
1.22 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Swit
LDDLW
Season result split
44% W17% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-7
1.50 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Troszyn is 29% better for: goals scored per game.

2.22 goals / game - Troszyn · 1.72 goals / game - Swit

Swit is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.83 goals / game - Troszyn · 1.72 goals / game - Swit

Troszyn scoring profile: very strong

Troszyn scores in 94% of games (17 of 18 games), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 games).

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 games), while Troszyn keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 games).

40Goals scored (season)31
TroszynSwit
33Goals conceded (season)31
TroszynSwit
4.06Average goals per game3.44
TroszynSwit
11Goals scored (last 5)7
TroszynSwit
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
TroszynSwit

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal83%
TroszynSwit
61%2 goals44%
TroszynSwit
22%3 goals33%
TroszynSwit
17%4 goals11%
TroszynSwit

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal78%
TroszynSwit
56%2 goals44%
TroszynSwit
28%3 goals28%
TroszynSwit
6%4 goals11%
TroszynSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time33%
TroszynSwit
6%BTTS in both halves17%
TroszynSwit
28%Scored in both halves39%
TroszynSwit

BTTS and goal count

72%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
TroszynSwit
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS28%
TroszynSwit
100%BTTS - last 560%
TroszynSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
TroszynSwit
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
TroszynSwit
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
TroszynSwit

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
TroszynSwit
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
TroszynSwit
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
TroszynSwit

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / game - Troszyn · 1.17 pts / game - Swit

Troszyn - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing
Swit - half-time state
28% leading33% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per game (1st half)1.17
TroszynSwit
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.78
TroszynSwit
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
TroszynSwit
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.83
TroszynSwit
39%Clean sheet before half-time33%
TroszynSwit
50%No goal before half-time44%
TroszynSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per game (2nd half)1.67
TroszynSwit
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
TroszynSwit
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
TroszynSwit
2.22Average goals (2nd half)1.61
TroszynSwit
44%Clean sheet after half-time50%
TroszynSwit
33%No goal after half-time33%
TroszynSwit

Troszyn - second-half results

44% W22% D33% L
19
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Swit - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
21
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Troszyn - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.81.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Swit - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Troszyn
ScoredConceded
10
8
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
7
31-45
8
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Swit
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
10
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
78%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Troszyn

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

TroszynLigaSwit
Average goals per game▲ 4.063.46• 3.44
Both teams scored▲ 83%67%▼ 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 83%68%▲ 72%
Clean sheets• 17%18%▲ 22%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%75%▲ 89%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%87%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.46
Average goals per game
67%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / game
1.54
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Troszyn's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Swit. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Swit
2 : 1
Troszyn

FAQ

What was the result of Troszyn vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Troszyn 5:0 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Troszyn vs Swit?

Troszyn score 2.22 goals per game on average and Swit 1.72. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Troszyn's matches and 61% of Swit's.

What form are Troszyn and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Troszyn have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Swit 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Troszyn vs Swit?

The statistical background for Troszyn vs Swit — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.