Tukums II vs JFK Ventspils: match statistics
Tukums II vs JFK Ventspils: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tukums II played against JFK Ventspils in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 26, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Tukums II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. JFK Ventspils has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Tukums II scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 3.00. JFK Ventspils scores 1.05 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Tukums II's games and 60% of JFK Ventspils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 55%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tukums II has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.30 per game. Tukums II takes 8.8 shots per game, while JFK Ventspils takes 7.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Tukums II leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. JFK Ventspils leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.45 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tukums II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For JFK Ventspils, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.73 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JFK Ventspils come into this match with a similar points return over their last five games (0.8 points per match), but their defensive record during this period is significantly stronger: they have conceded 8 goals, compared with 16 for Tukums II. The visitors average 1.75 goals per away game, versus 1.25 goals scored by the hosts at home, and they also convert 20% of their shots, compared with 10% for Tukums II. Ventspils enjoy more possession (53% to 45%), which should limit the number of attacks created by the hosts, despite Tukums II posting a slightly higher average home xG of 1.66 compared with 1.34. Both teams regularly concede goals—the hosts allow 1.75, while the visitors concede 1.88 per away match—so a draw remains a realistic outcome, but Ventspils’ better defensive organization of late points to a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
JFK Ventspils average 1.75 goals per match and have not recorded a single game without scoring, while Tukums II concede an average of 1.63 goals. However, the hosts are less reliable offensively, averaging just 0.50 goals and failing to score in 63% of their matches, which clearly weakens the BTTS pick. Their recent scoring form is better, as they averaged 1.0 goal across their last five matches, while Ventspils conceded 1.6 goals and allowed 1.93 xG during that period. Both defenses kept a clean sheet in only 13% of matches, and the hosts’ 1.18 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.59 xG conceded indicates that Tukums II should create chances. BTTS - Yes is therefore slightly more likely, although the hosts’ low seasonal scoring output means the edge over the No Goal scenario for one of the teams remains marginal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
JFK Ventspils average 1.75 goals per match, while Tukums II concede 1.63 goals over the full season and as many as 3.2 in their last five matches. The hosts score just 0.5 goals on average, but their xG stands at 1.18, while the visitors’ defense allows an average of 1.59 xG and concedes 1.88 goals. The 1.5 line has been covered in 100% of Ventspils’ matches and 63% of Tukums II’s games, while the league averages 3.58 goals per match. Both teams keep a clean sheet in just 13% of their matches, further reducing the likelihood of a very tight game. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as even with the hosts’ lower finishing efficiency, the visitors’ attacking potential and Tukums II’s defensive weaknesses clearly favor at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JFK Ventspils have a clear first-half advantage: they led at the break in 63% of their matches and averaged 1.00 goals before half-time, while Tukums II have never held a half-time lead and scored just 0.25 goals on average. In their last five matches, the hosts were trailing at half-time in 60% of cases, conceding an average of 1.8 goals, whereas Ventspils averaged 1.0 goal scored and only 0.4 goals conceded during this period. The visitors are also more effective over the full match, averaging 1.75 goals scored compared with Tukums II’s 0.50, while their shot conversion rate stands at 20% versus 8% for the hosts. Tukums II have lost 75% of their matches this season and conceded as many as 3.2 goals per game over their last five fixtures, which supports the likelihood of the visiting side maintaining its lead. The risk of a second-half turnaround remains significant, as Ventspils concede an average of 1.25 goals after the break; however, the HT/FT scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and securing the final victory is the most strongly supported by the data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums II | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JFK Ventspils is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Tukums II · 0.8 pts / game - JFK Ventspils
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tukums II is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - Tukums II · 1.05 goals / game - JFK Ventspils
JFK Ventspils is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
3 goals / game - Tukums II · 2 goals / game - JFK Ventspils
Tukums II scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 games), while JFK Ventspils keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 games).
JFK Ventspils scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 games), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums II
Over / Under - JFK Ventspils
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JFK Ventspils is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.65 pts / game - Tukums II · 1.15 pts / game - JFK Ventspils
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
JFK Ventspils - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 3.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -9 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tukums II
JFK Ventspils
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums II | Liga | JFK Ventspils | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.30 | 3.73 | ▼ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 64% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 71% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 20% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 84% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tukums II's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against JFK Ventspils. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums II vs JFK Ventspils?
The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 1:0 JFK Ventspils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and JFK Ventspils?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, JFK Ventspils won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs JFK Ventspils?
Tukums II score 1.30 goals per game on average and JFK Ventspils 1.05. The 1. Liga average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Tukums II's matches and 60% of JFK Ventspils's.
What form are Tukums II and JFK Ventspils in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and JFK Ventspils 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs JFK Ventspils?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


