Tukums II vs Skanste: match statistics
Tukums II vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tukums II played against Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 27, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Tukums II has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.33 points per game. Skanste has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Tukums II scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 2.67. Skanste scores 2.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Tukums II's games and 75% of Skanste's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 75%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 76% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tukums II has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.19 per game. Tukums II takes 8.3 shots per game, while Skanste takes 6.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Tukums II leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Skanste leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tukums II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Skanste, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.73 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 76% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win. Skanste have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches versus Tukums II’s 8, and over that span Skanste average 1.4 points per match compared to the hosts’ 0.8. Away, Skanste average 3.0 goals per game and show a +1 goal difference, while Tukums at home average 1.0 goal per game with a -4 goal difference and concede 3.0 goals at home. The hosts create significantly more chances (avg. 9 shots and 8.5 on target per game) and have an xG For of 1.43, but simultaneously an xG Against of 2.67 and 0% clean sheets at home. Skanste display a large discrepancy between away xG For (0.83) and the actual 3.0 goals, with 50% of away matches without scoring, indicating instability, yet overall their offensive efficiency and superior PPG predispose them to victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Tukums II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 100% in the last 5 matches, while Skanste shows 50% for the season and 80% in their last five, strongly favoring a both-teams-to-score scenario. League-wide BTTS occurs in 60% of matches, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, further increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Statistically Tukums II have scored 4 and conceded 8 this season (avg 1.0 scored and 1.5 conceded), and conceded an average of 3.0 goals in their last 5 matches; Skanste average 2.8 goals scored in their last 5 (14 goals in 5). xG comparison shows Tukums II with seasonal xG_for 1.37 vs xG_against 1.44, while Skanste despite a seasonal xG_for 0.83 has a last-5 xG_for of 1.93 versus 2.72 xG_against for Tukums II, indicating real scoring opportunities for both sides. For these reasons the strongest signal from the data points to BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of 4.00 goals in the match: 1.75 for Tukums II and 2.25 for Skanste. The estimate is based on seasonal averages: the home team scores 1.0 goal on average and the away team concedes 2.5 goals on average (yielding 1.75), while Skanste scores 3.0 goals and Tukums II concedes 1.5 goals on average (yielding 2.25 for the away side). This is corroborated by form over the last 5 matches — the home side scored 8 and conceded 15 (avg 4.6 goals per game), the visitors scored 14 and conceded 10 (avg 4.8 per game). Recent xG reads 1.41 for the home team and 1.93 for the visitors, with xG against of 2.72 (home) and 1.59 (away), which indicates a high probability of goals. Over/under metrics support Over 2.5: the share of matches above 2.5 is 50% for Tukums II and 100% for Skanste; in the last 5 matches this is 100% and 80% respectively, and league-wide 73% of games finish over 2.5. For these reasons I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the strongest signal; Over 1.5 is almost certain, while Over 3.5 has a moderate chance because the home team has 0% of matches above 3.5 this season despite the visitors having 100%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I project a half-time draw and an away win (X/2). The visitors average 3.0 goals per season versus 1.0 for the home side and have won 50% of matches while the hosts have not won (0%), indicating an overall advantage for the away team. However, the home side create more chances and have a higher xG (1.37 vs 0.83) and average 11.5 shots compared to 5.0 for the visitors, and they score on average 0.5 goals by the break versus 0.0 for the opponents, which increases the likelihood of a HT draw. The second half is decisive: the visitors average 3.0 goals in the second half and have 100% of matches with at least one goal after the break, while the home team have an xG against of 1.44 and have been conceding on average 1.6 goals after the break in the last five matches, favoring a turnaround. Therefore X/2 is the most probable outcome, with 1/2 as an alternative scenario or X/X if either side shows poor finishing.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums II | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 88% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 1.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Skanste is 203% better for: last-5 form.
0.33 pts / game - Tukums II · 1 pts / game - Skanste
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Skanste is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Tukums II · 2 goals / game - Skanste
Skanste is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.67 goals / game - Tukums II · 2 goals / game - Skanste
Tukums II scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).
Skanste scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums II
Over / Under - Skanste
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tukums II is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Tukums II · 0.5 pts / game - Skanste
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Skanste - second-half results
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 67% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tukums II
Skanste
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums II | Liga | Skanste | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.73 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 76% | • 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Tukums IIGoalYushin Koki
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tukums II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Skanste. Games average 5.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums II vs Skanste?
The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 2:0 Skanste. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and Skanste?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, Skanste won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs Skanste?
Tukums II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Skanste 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 76% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Tukums II's matches and 75% of Skanste's.
What form are Tukums II and Skanste in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Skanste 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs Skanste?
The statistical background for Tukums II vs Skanste — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.