Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Tukums vs Riga: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Riga crest
Riga

Tukums vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums played against Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 20, 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

Tukums has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Riga has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums scores 2.08 goals per game and allows 1.62. Riga scores 3.23 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 92% of Tukums's games and 69% of Riga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 92%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Riga has the higher season xG average, 2.07 to 1.42 per game. Tukums takes 11.2 shots per game, while Riga takes 17.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 1.08 goals per game after halftime. Riga leads at halftime in 62% and scores 1.77 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Riga, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (Riga) — their season metrics make the difference: 9 wins, 3 draws and only 1 loss versus Tukums’ 2 wins, 7 draws and 4 losses. Riga average 3.43 goals scored on the road with 14.86 shots and 6.71 shots on target, while Tukums at home average 2.43 goals with 11.14 shots and 5.29 shots on target, giving the visitors an offensive edge. The visitors also have higher xG (1.87 vs 1.44) and substantially greater possession (64% vs 44%), indicating better game control and quality of chances. Defensively Riga concede 1.14 goals away with an xG against of 1.06, whereas Tukums concede 1.29 at home with xG against 1.54 — Tukums partially benefits from opponents’ lower finishing, but that does not offset Riga’s advantage. Although Tukums scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches versus Riga’s 13, Riga show clearly better points form (2.2 points per match vs 1.6) and a 71% away win efficiency, so I assign a higher probability to an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams display high season BTTS rates: Tukums 67% and Riga 71%, averaging 69% and exceeding the league level of 60%. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 80% of games for both sides; during that period Tukums averaged 3.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Riga scored 2.6 and conceded 1.4. Over 2.5 occurs in 83% of Tukums matches and 100% of Riga matches, and the Over 2.5 + BTTS combination is 67% (Tukums) and 71% (Riga), indicating a very high likelihood of matches with goal exchanges. This is supported by xG and shot statistics: Tukums has xG 2.31 versus xG against 0.75, and Riga xG 1.87 versus xG against 1.06, with averages of 6.33 and 6.71 shots on target respectively, confirming both teams create and concede chances. Considering the season average 69%, 80% in the last 5 matches and very high Over 2.5 rates (83%/100%), I project BTTS probability at 79% vs 21%, therefore I tip 'yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: Tukums has an attacking xG of 2.31 and Riga conceding xG of 1.06 — giving roughly 1.69 expected goals for the home side; likewise Riga with attacking xG 1.87 and xG against 0.75 gives 1.31 for the visitors, totaling 3.00 goals. Seasonal and recent trends confirm a high-scoring profile: Tukums averages 3.0 goals per match this season (last 5: 3.2), Riga has a seasonal average of 3.43 (last 5: 2.6), and both teams have 80% of their last 5 matches going over 2.5 goals. Both teams scoring occurs in 67% of Tukums matches and 71% of Riga matches; shots on target 6.33 vs 6.71 and conversion rates 15% vs 23% suggest both sides create and convert chances. Seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 83% for Tukums and 100% for Riga, which together with the expected total of 3.00 provides a strong signal for Over 2.5 — I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at about 75%. Therefore I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the best line and side to play; the 1.5 line is an even stronger but lower-paying signal (~85%), while Over 3.5 is less likely (~38%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tukums has a strong start: they led at the break in 4 of 6 matches (67%) and average 1.33 goals by Half-Time while conceding 0.67. In the last 5 meetings the home side averages 1.6 goals by Half-Time versus Riga’s 0.8 (1.6 vs 0.8), which reinforces Tukums’ advantage in the first half. Additionally, Tukums generates higher-quality chances — home xG is 2.31 compared with Riga’s 1.87 xG on the road and Tukums averages 19.83 shots versus Riga’s 14.86, increasing the likelihood of a lead at the break and maintaining that advantage. Full-Time remains open (average goals 3.0 for Tukums vs 3.43 for Riga) and Riga has better shot efficiency (23% vs 15%), but the xG balance and shot ratio suggest the most reliable signal is a home lead and home win, hence the 1/1 selection.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

32Possession (%)68
TukumsRiga
10Shots9
TukumsRiga
4Shots on target5
TukumsRiga
1.07xG1.46
TukumsRiga
4Corners9
TukumsRiga
22Dangerous attacks72
TukumsRiga
11Fouls11
TukumsRiga
2Cards3
TukumsRiga

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.08Goals scored / game3.23
TukumsRiga
1.62Goals allowed / game1.23
TukumsRiga
45%Average possession65%
TukumsRiga
4.85Shots on target / game6.54
TukumsRiga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.23Shots per game17.15
TukumsRiga
4.85Shots on target6.54
TukumsRiga
18.5%Shot conversion18.8%
TukumsRiga
45%Possession65%
TukumsRiga
1.42xG for2.07
TukumsRiga
1.59xG against0.92
TukumsRiga

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingRiga: Dominant
TukumsRiga
Accuracy (shots on target)43%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Riga is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Tukums · 2.2 pts / game - Riga

Tukums
LWWDD
Season result split
15% W54% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-7-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Riga
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
69% W23% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-1
2.31 pts / game · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.05Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 55% better for: goals scored per game.

2.08 goals / game - Tukums · 3.23 goals / game - Riga

Riga is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.62 goals / game - Tukums · 1.23 goals / game - Riga

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 100% of games (13 of 13 meczów), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 100% of games (13 of 13 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).

27Goals scored (season)42
TukumsRiga
21Goals conceded (season)16
TukumsRiga
3.69Average goals per game4.46
TukumsRiga
16Goals scored (last 5)13
TukumsRiga
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
TukumsRiga

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
TukumsRiga
38%2 goals85%
TukumsRiga
31%3 goals69%
TukumsRiga
15%4 goals38%
TukumsRiga

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal69%
TukumsRiga
54%2 goals38%
TukumsRiga
15%3 goals15%
TukumsRiga
0%4 goals0%
TukumsRiga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time38%
TukumsRiga
15%BTTS in both halves15%
TukumsRiga
38%Scored in both halves69%
TukumsRiga

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
TukumsRiga
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
TukumsRiga
80%BTTS - last 580%
TukumsRiga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
TukumsRiga
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time77%
TukumsRiga
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
TukumsRiga

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
TukumsRiga
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
TukumsRiga
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
TukumsRiga

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / game - Tukums · 2 pts / game - Riga

Tukums - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing
Riga - half-time state
62% leading15% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per game (1st half)2
TukumsRiga
1Goals scored (1st half)1.46
TukumsRiga
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
TukumsRiga
1.92Average goals (1st half)2.15
TukumsRiga
38%Clean sheet before half-time46%
TukumsRiga
31%No goal before half-time23%
TukumsRiga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per game (2nd half)2.31
TukumsRiga
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)1.77
TukumsRiga
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
TukumsRiga
1.77Average goals (2nd half)2.31
TukumsRiga
38%Clean sheet after half-time62%
TukumsRiga
31%No goal after half-time8%
TukumsRiga

Tukums - second-half results

38% W38% R23% P
16
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Riga - second-half results

69% W23% R8% P
26
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game1.61.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game2.62.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Riga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.403.00
Goals scored / game0.81.8
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
6
16-30
7
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
4
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Riga
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
6
3
16-30
9
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
6
2
61-75
11
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
132%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
81%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
223%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaRiga
Average goals per game 3.693.08 4.46
Both teams scored 92%60% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%55% 92%
Clean sheets 8%21% 31%
Goal before half-time 92%77% 92%
Goal after half-time 85%86% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RigaYellow cardAhmed Ankrah
  2. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Raivis ĶiršsOff: Bogdans Samoilovs
  3. TukumsYellow cardMārcis Šusts
  4. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Martins ŠtālsOff: Ruslans Deružinskis
  5. TukumsYellow cardShun Shibata

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses against Riga. Games average 2.60 goals, and both teams scored in 20% of them.

Riga
3 : 3
Tukums
Riga FC
0 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
3 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
0 : 3
Riga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Riga?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:3 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Riga?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Riga won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Riga?

Tukums score 2.08 goals per game on average and Riga 3.23. The Virsliga average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 92% of Tukums's matches and 69% of Riga's.

What form are Tukums and Riga in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Riga 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Riga?

The statistical background for Tukums vs Riga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.