Tukums vs Rīgas FS: match statistics
Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums play Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Tukums: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Rīgas FS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums scores 1.65 and concedes 2.04 goals per match. Rīgas FS scores 2.39 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums 91%, Rīgas FS 43%. Over 2.5: Tukums 78%, Rīgas FS 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.42. Tukums: 11.9 shots per match, Rīgas FS: 16.0.
Match halves
Tukums: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83. Rīgas FS: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.30.
Goals by minute
Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). Rīgas FS: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 0-0-5. Average goals 5.40, BTTS 80%.
Match description
Rīgas FS are the clear favorites in this matchup: the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points per game over that span, while Tukums have 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses in their last 5 with only 0.6 points per game. At home Tukums average 1.0 goals scored and concede 1.5 goals (xG for 1.39, xG against 1.45), have not yet won at home (0% wins) and have kept 0% clean sheets. Rīgas FS in away matches average 1.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded (xG for 1.77 vs xG against 0.75), recording 100% clean sheets and 100% wins on the road. The visitors register more shots and on-target attempts (13.5 shots and 6 on target vs the hosts’ 10 shots and 5 on target) and create better chances, despite similar possession (55% vs 56%). Considering the hosts’ 0% win rate, the visitors’ 100% away wins and the advantage in goals conceded and xG, I expect a Rīgas FS victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Tukums · 2.39 goals / match - Rīgas FS
Rīgas FS is 191% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.04 goals / match - Tukums · 0.7 goals / match - Rīgas FS
Tukums scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).
Rīgas FS scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tukums
Over / Under — Rīgas FS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Tukums · 2 pts / match - Rīgas FS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums
Rīgas FS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums | Liga | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.70 | 2.98 | ▲ 3.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 91% | 56% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 78% | 55% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 24% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Tukums 0 - 0 - 5 Rīgas FS. Average goals 5.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums vs Rīgas FS?
The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:2 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Rīgas FS?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Rīgas FS won 5 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Rīgas FS?
Tukums score 1.65 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.39. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 91% of Tukums's matches and 43% of Rīgas FS's.
What form are Tukums and Rīgas FS in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Rīgas FS?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.