United States - USL ChampionshipONEOK FieldData current as of September 06, 2026

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic: match statistics

Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tulsa Roughnecks played against Hartford Athletic in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on May 23, 2026. Venue: ONEOK Field. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Tulsa Roughnecks has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Hartford Athletic has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.13. Hartford Athletic scores 1.13 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Tulsa Roughnecks's games and 38% of Hartford Athletic's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 63%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tulsa Roughnecks has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.35 per game. Tulsa Roughnecks takes 12.0 shots per game, while Hartford Athletic takes 11.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Tulsa Roughnecks leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 1.13 goals per game after halftime. Hartford Athletic leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.63 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tulsa Roughnecks's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Hartford Athletic, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (Tulsa). The hosts have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches with a 3 wins and 2 draws record, equating to an average of 2.2 points per match, while Hartford in the same period scored 4 goals with a 2-2-1 record and an average of 1.6 points per match. Tulsa at home averages 1.00 goals and xG 1.36 with 11.75 shots, 3.25 on target and 53% possession, whereas Hartford away averages 1.25 goals, xG 1.18, 11 shots and only 38% possession. Defensively Hartford officially concedes just 0.25 goals per away game and has 75% clean sheets, but their average away xG against is 1.63 — this suggests the low 0.25 goals conceded may be due to luck or strong goalkeeping rather than a lack of chances. Considering Tulsa’s superior offensive momentum (9 vs 4 goals in the last 5) and home control of the game, I assess probabilities of 55% for the hosts, 25% for a draw and 20% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I lean towards 'No' (no BTTS) as more likely. Hartford has 75% clean sheets away and concedes only 0.25 goals per away match on average, with a seasonal BTTS rate of just 25%. Tulsa shows offensive indicators — seasonal xG 1.52, 4.25 shots on target on average and 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 avg), translating to 80% BTTS in that form window. However, seasonally Tulsa scores only 1.0 goal and has 25% clean sheets at home, while xG against Hartford away is 1.63 — visitors allow chances but still only concede 0.25 goals on average, suggesting Hartford’s strong defensive efficiency or high variance. Additionally, home BTTS is 50% vs guests’ 25%, and league BTTS is 56%, indicating this matchup favors the visitors’ defensive edge over the hosts’ offense. I assign 70% probability to the No BTTS scenario and 30% to BTTS (Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (Tulsa attack xG 1.52 vs Hartford conceded xG 1.63; Hartford attack xG 1.18 vs Tulsa conceded xG 1.33) yields 1.58 expected goals for Tulsa and 1.26 for Hartford, totaling 2.84 goals. Seasonal metrics support a higher outcome: Tulsa at home have 75% of matches over 2.5 goals, Hartford away 50%, and the league averages 2.72 goals per match. In the last 5 matches Tulsa scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and conceded 4 (0.8), while Hartford scored 4 (0.8) and conceded 5 (1.0), indicating a home advantage in tempo and goal production. Since the expected total of 2.84 is above the 2.5 line, I assign a 65% probability to Over 2.5 (Under 35%); Over 1.5 is rated highly at 90%/10%, and Over 3.5 is low at 25%/75%. Recommendation: play Over 2.5 as the strongest signal, noting that Hartford have 75% clean sheets away, which advises caution regarding odds.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 2/2: the away team leads at Half-Time and wins the match. The away side score on average 0.75 goals by the break versus 0.25 for the home side, and they concede on average 0.0 goals by Half-Time compared to 0.75 for the hosts; away teams lead at the break in 50% of matches versus 25% for the home team. After the full match the away team also shows better defense: they concede an average of 0.25 goals per game versus 1.75 for the hosts, and the away win rate is 50% compared to 25% for the home side. Although the home team has higher xG (1.52 vs 1.18) and more shots on target (4.25 vs 3.25), the away team’s efficiency and clean sheets (75% clean sheets this season vs 25% for the hosts) support maintaining the lead. Therefore I assign 45% to 2/2 as the strongest signal; alternatives are X/2 (20%) and 2/X (10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

31Possession (%)69
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
6Shots17
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
3Shots on target5
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.87xG2.01
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
3Corners5
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38Dangerous attacks82
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
15Fouls13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
3Cards7
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.38Goals scored / game1.13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.13Goals allowed / game1
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
50%Average possession45%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
4Shots on target / game3.75
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12Shots per game11
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
4Shots on target3.75
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
11.5%Shot conversion10.2%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
50%Possession45%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.42xG for1.35
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.13xG against1.48
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Shooting quality

Tulsa Roughnecks: BalancedHartford Athletic: Balanced
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.2 pts / game - Hartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks
DLDWW
Season result split
38% W38% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-2
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 at home
1-2-1
DWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Hartford Athletic
DDLDW
Season result split
38% W50% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-1
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 away
2-2-0
WDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tulsa Roughnecks is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.13 goals / game - Hartford Athletic

Hartford Athletic is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.13 goals / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1 goals / game - Hartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks scoring profile: mixed

Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Hartford Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 meczów).

Hartford Athletic scoring profile: strong

Hartford Athletic scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 meczów), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

11Goals scored (season)9
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
9Goals conceded (season)8
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
2.5Average goals per game2.13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38%2 goals50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%3 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
13%4 goals0%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%2 goals25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%3 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%4 goals13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time0%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%Scored in both halves25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
80%BTTS - last 540%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hartford Athletic is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.63 pts / game - Hartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks - half-time state
13% leading63% draw25% trailing
Hartford Athletic - half-time state
38% leading50% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.63
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.63Average goals (1st half)0.88
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
63%Clean sheet before half-time88%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
75%No goal before half-time63%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per game (2nd half)1.13
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic
38%No goal after half-time63%
Tulsa RoughnecksHartford Athletic

Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Hartford Athletic - second-half results

25% W38% R38% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tulsa Roughnecks - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Hartford Athletic - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tulsa Roughnecks
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Hartford Athletic
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.32
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tulsa Roughnecks

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Hartford Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Tulsa RoughnecksLigaHartford Athletic
Average goals per game 2.502.72 2.13
Both teams scored 63%57% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%55% 63%
Clean sheets 13%27% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%68% 50%
Goal after half-time 88%81% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Grant RobinsonOff: Delentz Pierre
  2. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardIan Carlo Souza Daniel
  3. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBarry Coffey
  4. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBeverly Makangila
  5. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardNelson Pierre
  6. Tulsa RoughnecksGoalJamie Craig Webber
  7. Tulsa RoughnecksYellow cardAlonzo Clarke
  8. Tulsa RoughnecksGoalAlonzo ClarkeAssist: Bruno Lapa
  9. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Emmanuel SamadiaOff: Thomas John Presthus
  10. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Sadat Happy AnakuOff: Barry Coffey
  11. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Andrés HernándezOff: Beverly Makangila
  12. Hartford AthleticYellow cardAdrián Diz Pe
  13. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Giordano ColliOff: Nelson Pierre
  14. Hartford AthleticYellow cardJordan Scarlett
  15. Tulsa RoughnecksSubstitutionOn: Zion SirangaOff: Bailey Sparks
  16. Hartford AthleticYellow cardMichee Ngalina
  17. Hartford AthleticRed cardSamuel Alejandro Careaga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tulsa Roughnecks's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Hartford Athletic. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Hartford Athletic
1 : 1
Tulsa Roughnecks FC
Tulsa Roughnecks
1 : 2
Hartford Athletic

FAQ

What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic?

The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 2:0 Hartford Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Hartford Athletic?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 0, Hartford Athletic won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic?

Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.38 goals per game on average and Hartford Athletic 1.13. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 38% of Hartford Athletic's.

What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Hartford Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Hartford Athletic 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic?

The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Hartford Athletic — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.