Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots: match statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tulsa Roughnecks played against Oakland Roots in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on October 18, 2026. Venue: ONEOK Field. Final score: 2:4.
Recent form
Tulsa Roughnecks has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Oakland Roots has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.89. Oakland Roots scores 1.18 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Tulsa Roughnecks's games and 54% of Oakland Roots's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 43%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Oakland Roots has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.28 per game. Tulsa Roughnecks takes 10.5 shots per game, while Oakland Roots takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Tulsa Roughnecks leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Oakland Roots leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.64 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tulsa Roughnecks's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Oakland Roots, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tulsa Roughnecks sit 8th and have won 50% of their home matches, while 19th-placed Oakland Roots have won 31% of their away games. The hosts’ biggest advantage is their defensive strength: at home, they concede an average of 0.57 goals and keep a clean sheet in 57% of matches, whereas Oakland concede 1.31 goals away and keep 38% clean sheets. The visitors create slightly better attacking chances on the road, recording an xG of 1.35 compared with the hosts’ 1.26 at home, but they also allow opponents chances worth an xG of 1.65, versus 1.25 for Tulsa. Tulsa are unbeaten in their last five matches, although they have drawn four of them, while Oakland have won twice, increasing the likelihood of a closely contested game. However, the hosts’ stronger defense and better home record point to a Tulsa win, with a draw remaining a significant possibility.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I’m backing BTTS - No, although the edge for this outcome is slight: both teams scored in 60% of Tulsa’s matches this season and 46% of Oakland’s. Over their last five games, however, those figures were 60% and just 20%, respectively, with each team conceding an average of 0.8 goals. Both sides scored 1.0 goal per game over that span, so neither offers a strong indication that they are certain to find the net. In addition, Tulsa failed to score in 33% of its matches this season, compared with 31% for Oakland, while the visitors kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games. Equal attacking xG averages of 1.35 point to chances at both ends, but recent finishing and defensive form slightly increase the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: 80% of Tulsa’s matches and 62% of Oakland’s finished below this line. In their last 5 games, both teams averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, making for 1.8 goals per match and supporting a cautious forecast. The season averages for total goals in their matches are 2.33 and 2.54, respectively, both below the league average of 2.71. The hosts’ higher xG of 1.35, compared with the 1.65 xG from chances conceded by the visitors, gives Tulsa a chance to score, but does not outweigh the evidence against four goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time and full-time is the most likely outcome: Oakland were level at the break in 69% of their matches and kept a first-half clean sheet in four of their last five. Tulsa, however, have made stronger starts—leading at half-time in three of their last five matches—so a half-time lead for them remains a significant alternative. A draw at full-time is supported by the fact that Tulsa have drawn four of their last five matches, while the teams’ draw rates for the season are similar, at 40% and 38%. Oakland are more dangerous after the break, averaging 0.85 goals in the second half compared with Tulsa’s 0.47; Tulsa have failed to score after half-time in each of their last five matches. This visitors’ advantage increases the risk of an X/2 outcome, but with both teams averaging 1.8 goals per match across their last five appearances, X/X remains the strongest single pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Oakland Roots | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Oakland Roots is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.6 pts / game - Oakland Roots
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.89 goals / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.25 goals / game - Oakland Roots
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 games), while Oakland Roots keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 games).
Oakland Roots scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 games), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
Over / Under - Oakland Roots
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.64 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.25 pts / game - Oakland Roots
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Oakland Roots - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tulsa Roughnecks
Oakland Roots
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Liga | Oakland Roots | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.04 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 27% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 66% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tulsa Roughnecks's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against Oakland Roots. Games average 1.80 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots?
The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 2:4 Oakland Roots. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Oakland Roots?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 1, Oakland Roots won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots?
Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.14 goals per game on average and Oakland Roots 1.18. The USL Championship average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 54% of Oakland Roots's.
What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Oakland Roots in?
Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Oakland Roots 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots?
The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Oakland Roots — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.