Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa: match statistics
Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tunari played against CSM Reşiţa in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Tunari has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. CSM Reşiţa has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Tunari scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.67. CSM Reşiţa scores 1.48 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.69 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Tunari's games and 48% of CSM Reşiţa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 44%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CSM Reşiţa has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.22 per game. Tunari takes 9.3 shots per game, while CSM Reşiţa takes 14.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Tunari leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. CSM Reşiţa leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.56 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tunari's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For CSM Reşiţa, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.69 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CSM Reşiţa holds a clear advantage in seasonal attacking metrics: 40 goals scored versus Tunari’s 25, and an away scoring rate of 1.25 goals per game compared to the home side’s 0.92. Visitors average 1.72 xG on the road, while Tunari register 1.4 xG at home and concede 2.05 xG, indicating greater defensive vulnerability for Tunari. Shot metrics reinforce CSM Reşiţa’s edge — 13.5 average shots and 4.92 on target per away match versus Tunari’s 10.31 and 3.69, with a similar conversion rate around 9%. In the short term Tunari show a better run (6 goals and 1.6 points per game in the last 5) versus 3 goals and 0.8 pts for CSM Reşiţa, but Tunari suffer 62% home defeats and only 8% clean sheets, weakening the home advantage. Considering the quality of created chances and the visitors’ more stable defense (1.5 goals conceded away vs 1.85 at home), I favor a CSM Reşiţa win and propose a probability split of 20%-25%-55% (home-draw-away).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Tunari and CSM Reşiţa average 1.67 and 1.25 goals scored per match this season while conceding 1.2 and 1.5 respectively, indicating both teams tend to score and concede. xG reinforces this: Tunari 1.83 xG vs 1.23 xG against, CSM 1.72 xG vs 1.54 xG against — both sides create chances and are vulnerable defensively. In the last 5 matches Tunari had BTTS in 80% (4/5) and conceded on average 1.6 goals, whereas CSM recorded BTTS in 40% (2/5) and scored on average 0.6 goals, which supports a Goal/Goal scenario. Season BTTS rates are 40% for Tunari and 58% for CSM against a league average of 49%; additionally, shots on target 5.47 vs 4.92 and conversion 12% vs 9% favor the hosts having sufficient quality to force a response. Consequently I back BTTS - Yes with a probability of 64% versus 36% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.69 goals for Tunari (xG for 1.83 vs xG conceded by CSM Reşiţa 1.54) and 1.48 for CSM Reşiţa (away xG 1.72 vs xG conceded by hosts 1.23), i.e. ~3.17 goals total. With lambda=3.17 the Poisson distribution gives ~83% chance for Over 1.5 goals, ~61% for Over 2.5 and ~39% for Over 3.5; this aligns with seasonal Over 1.5 rates (Tunari 80%, CSM Reşiţa 83%) and high Over 0.5 (100% vs 92%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches Tunari have conceded/produced 14 goals total (avg 2.8), and Reşiţa 10 goals (avg 2.0), which supports an expectation of more than 1–2 goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimated 83%), therefore I recommend playing the over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Tunari holds a statistical edge: average goals per game 1.67 versus 1.25 for CSM Reşiţa and higher xG 1.83 vs 1.72, while the home side’s shot conversion rate of 12% compared to the visitors’ 9% increases the likelihood of chances being turned into goals. At Half-Time Tunari scores on average 1.07 goals and led at the break in 6 matches (40%), whereas CSM Reşiţa averages 0.75 goals by Half-Time and led only in 33% of matches, which strongly supports the hosts having the lead at the break. 87% of Tunari’s matches featured over 0.5 goals in the first half, and in the second half CSM Reşiţa concedes on average 1.0 goal versus only 0.6 conceded by Tunari, so the hosts have a greater chance of maintaining or extending a lead. Seasonal win rates—53% for the home side versus 33% for the visitors—and average points gained by Half-Time 1.6 for Tunari vs 1.58 for CSM Reşiţa confirm the 1/1 scenario as the strongest HT/FT signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tunari | CSM Reşiţa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tunari is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Tunari · 0.8 pts / game - CSM Reşiţa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CSM Reşiţa is 59% better for: goals scored per game.
0.93 goals / game - Tunari · 1.48 goals / game - CSM Reşiţa
CSM Reşiţa is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Tunari · 1.33 goals / game - CSM Reşiţa
Tunari scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 meczów), while CSM Reşiţa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 meczów).
CSM Reşiţa scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while Tunari keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tunari
Over / Under - CSM Reşiţa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSM Reşiţa is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / game - Tunari · 1.59 pts / game - CSM Reşiţa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tunari - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
CSM Reşiţa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tunari
CSM Reşiţa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Tunari | Liga | CSM Reşiţa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.59 | 2.69 | ▲ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 49% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 29% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 82% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tunari's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against CSM Reşiţa. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?
The Liga II match finished Tunari 3:1 CSM Reşiţa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?
Tunari score 0.93 goals per game on average and CSM Reşiţa 1.48. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Tunari's matches and 48% of CSM Reşiţa's.
What form are Tunari and CSM Reşiţa in?
Over the last 5 games Tunari have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CSM Reşiţa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tunari vs CSM Reşiţa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


