Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of September 06, 2026

Tusker vs Leopards: match statistics

Tusker crest
Tusker
0 : 4half-time 0:0
Leopards crest
Leopards
130%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
235%(0.00)

Leopards are showing significantly better form and stability this season. The visitors possess an impressive away record with 43% wins and just 14% losses, while Tusker only wins 29% of home games and loses 43%. Form over the last five matches also favors Leopards – the team has earned 2.2 points per match and remains unbeaten (3W-2D-0L), whereas Tusker, despite a good overall run, has a weaker streak at home (29% CS, negative goal difference -2). Leopards are further characterized by a better away defense (0.86 goals conceded per match vs 1.0 for Tusker at home) and higher offensive efficiency (1.0 goals scored per match away). Considering all statistics, Leopards are the favorites for this match, although the high percentage of draws in their away games (43%) makes a sharing of points very likely as well.

Tusker vs Leopards: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tusker played against Leopards in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on January 10, 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Recent form

Tusker has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Leopards has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Tusker scores 0.87 goals per game and allows 0.73. Leopards scores 1.07 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 1.92 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Tusker's games and 40% of Leopards's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 27%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tusker has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.28 per game. Tusker takes 12.3 shots per game, while Leopards takes 7.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Tusker leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Leopards leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.47 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tusker's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Leopards, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Kenyan Premier League games average 1.92 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Leopards are showing significantly better form and stability this season. The visitors possess an impressive away record with 43% wins and just 14% losses, while Tusker only wins 29% of home games and loses 43%. Form over the last five matches also favors Leopards – the team has earned 2.2 points per match and remains unbeaten (3W-2D-0L), whereas Tusker, despite a good overall run, has a weaker streak at home (29% CS, negative goal difference -2). Leopards are further characterized by a better away defense (0.86 goals conceded per match vs 1.0 for Tusker at home) and higher offensive efficiency (1.0 goals scored per match away). Considering all statistics, Leopards are the favorites for this match, although the high percentage of draws in their away games (43%) makes a sharing of points very likely as well.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
TuskerLeopards
7Shots6
TuskerLeopards
1Shots on target4
TuskerLeopards
0.99xG1.01
TuskerLeopards
6Corners2
TuskerLeopards
67Dangerous attacks48
TuskerLeopards
-1Fouls-1
TuskerLeopards
-1Cards-1
TuskerLeopards

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.87Goals scored / game1.07
TuskerLeopards
0.73Goals allowed / game0.67
TuskerLeopards
50%Average possession48%
TuskerLeopards
4.27Shots on target / game2.47
TuskerLeopards

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.27Shots per game7.93
TuskerLeopards
4.27Shots on target2.47
TuskerLeopards
7.1%Shot conversion13.4%
TuskerLeopards
50%Possession48%
TuskerLeopards
1.55xG for1.28
TuskerLeopards
1.48xG against1.24
TuskerLeopards

Shooting quality

Tusker: BalancedLeopards: Efficient finishing
TuskerLeopards
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tusker is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Tusker · 2 pts / game - Leopards

Tusker
WWWLW
Season result split
47% W20% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-5
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Leopards
WLDWW
Season result split
47% W40% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-2
1.80 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leopards is 23% better for: goals scored per game.

0.87 goals / game - Tusker · 1.07 goals / game - Leopards

Leopards is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.73 goals / game - Tusker · 0.67 goals / game - Leopards

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 meczów).

Leopards scoring profile: mixed

Leopards scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 meczów).

13Goals scored (season)16
TuskerLeopards
11Goals conceded (season)10
TuskerLeopards
1.6Average goals per game1.73
TuskerLeopards
5Goals scored (last 5)4
TuskerLeopards
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
TuskerLeopards

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal67%
TuskerLeopards
13%2 goals40%
TuskerLeopards
0%3 goals0%
TuskerLeopards
0%4 goals0%
TuskerLeopards

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal53%
TuskerLeopards
20%2 goals13%
TuskerLeopards
0%3 goals0%
TuskerLeopards
0%4 goals0%
TuskerLeopards

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time13%
TuskerLeopards
0%BTTS in both halves7%
TuskerLeopards
7%Scored in both halves13%
TuskerLeopards

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
TuskerLeopards
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
TuskerLeopards
0%BTTS - last 520%
TuskerLeopards

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
TuskerLeopards
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
TuskerLeopards
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TuskerLeopards

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
TuskerLeopards
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
TuskerLeopards
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TuskerLeopards

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tusker is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / game - Tusker · 1 pts / game - Leopards

Tusker - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
Leopards - half-time state
7% leading80% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per game (1st half)1
TuskerLeopards
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.2
TuskerLeopards
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
TuskerLeopards
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.47
TuskerLeopards
67%Clean sheet before half-time73%
TuskerLeopards
73%No goal before half-time80%
TuskerLeopards

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per game (2nd half)1.33
TuskerLeopards
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
TuskerLeopards
0.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
TuskerLeopards
0.53Average goals (2nd half)0.73
TuskerLeopards
87%Clean sheet after half-time80%
TuskerLeopards
60%No goal after half-time67%
TuskerLeopards

Tusker - second-half results

27% W73% R0% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding235%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Leopards - second-half results

20% W73% R7% P
15
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding671%

Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tusker - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.20.2
1 goal20%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Leopards - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Leopards
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Leopards

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TuskerLigaLeopards
Average goals per game 1.601.92 1.73
Both teams scored 33%41% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%30% 27%
Clean sheets 47%37% 47%
Goal before half-time 53%34% 33%
Goal after half-time 40%36% 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.92
Average goals per game
41%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+-12%
Home attack advantage
+-13%
Home defensive advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
34%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
36%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Tusker vs Leopards?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Tusker 0:4 Leopards. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tusker vs Leopards?

Tusker score 0.87 goals per game on average and Leopards 1.07. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tusker's matches and 40% of Leopards's.

What form are Tusker and Leopards in?

Over the last 5 games Tusker have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Leopards 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tusker vs Leopards?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.