Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Tusker vs Leopards: match statistics

Tusker crest
Tusker
0 : 4half-time 0:0
Leopards crest
Leopards
130%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
235%(0.00)

Leopards are showing significantly better form and stability this season. The visitors possess an impressive away record with 43% wins and just 14% losses, while Tusker only wins 29% of home games and loses 43%. Form over the last five matches also favors Leopards – the team has earned 2.2 points per match and remains unbeaten (3W-2D-0L), whereas Tusker, despite a good overall run, has a weaker streak at home (29% CS, negative goal difference -2). Leopards are further characterized by a better away defense (0.86 goals conceded per match vs 1.0 for Tusker at home) and higher offensive efficiency (1.0 goals scored per match away). Considering all statistics, Leopards are the favorites for this match, although the high percentage of draws in their away games (43%) makes a sharing of points very likely as well.

Tusker vs Leopards: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tusker play Leopards in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 10 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Tusker: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Leopards: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tusker scores 0.83 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Leopards scores 1.31 and concedes 0.72. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tusker 34%, Leopards 34%. Over 2.5: Tusker 28%, Leopards 34%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Tusker: 10.9 shots per match, Leopards: 9.4.

Match halves

Tusker: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.21. Leopards: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Tusker: 0-15 (14 goals). Leopards: 0-15 (25 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Leopards are showing significantly better form and stability this season. The visitors possess an impressive away record with 43% wins and just 14% losses, while Tusker only wins 29% of home games and loses 43%. Form over the last five matches also favors Leopards – the team has earned 2.2 points per match and remains unbeaten (3W-2D-0L), whereas Tusker, despite a good overall run, has a weaker streak at home (29% CS, negative goal difference -2). Leopards are further characterized by a better away defense (0.86 goals conceded per match vs 1.0 for Tusker at home) and higher offensive efficiency (1.0 goals scored per match away). Considering all statistics, Leopards are the favorites for this match, although the high percentage of draws in their away games (43%) makes a sharing of points very likely as well.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
TuskerLeopards
7Shots6
TuskerLeopards
1Shots on target4
TuskerLeopards
0.99xG1.01
TuskerLeopards
6Corners2
TuskerLeopards
67Dangerous attacks48
TuskerLeopards
-1Fouls-1
TuskerLeopards
-1Cards-1
TuskerLeopards

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.83Goals scored / match1.31
TuskerLeopards
0.93Goals conceded / match0.72
TuskerLeopards
51%Average possession48%
TuskerLeopards
3.79Shots on target / match3.41
TuskerLeopards

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.93Shots per match9.38
TuskerLeopards
3.79Shots on target3.41
TuskerLeopards
7.6%Shot conversion14%
TuskerLeopards
51%Possession48%
TuskerLeopards
1.42xG for1.42
TuskerLeopards
1.4xG against1.31
TuskerLeopards

Shooting quality

Tusker: BalancedLeopards: Efficient finishing
TuskerLeopards
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Leopards is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Tusker · 2.4 pts / match - Leopards

Tusker
LWLDL
Season result split
41% W17% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Leopards
WWWLW
Season result split
59% W24% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-7-5
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-4-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leopards is 58% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Tusker · 1.31 goals / match - Leopards

Leopards is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Tusker · 0.72 goals / match - Leopards

Tusker scoring profile: mixed

Tusker scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).

Leopards scoring profile: strong

Leopards scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

24Goals scored (season)38
TuskerLeopards
27Goals conceded (season)21
TuskerLeopards
1.76Average goals in match2.03
TuskerLeopards
1Goals scored (last 5)6
TuskerLeopards
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
TuskerLeopards

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal72%
TuskerLeopards
17%2 goals41%
TuskerLeopards
0%3 goals7%
TuskerLeopards
0%4 goals7%
TuskerLeopards

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal48%
TuskerLeopards
21%2 goals14%
TuskerLeopards
7%3 goals7%
TuskerLeopards
3%4 goals3%
TuskerLeopards

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time7%
TuskerLeopards
0%BTTS in both halves3%
TuskerLeopards
3%Scored in both halves7%
TuskerLeopards

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
TuskerLeopards
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
TuskerLeopards
0%BTTS - last 50%
TuskerLeopards

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

31%Min. 1 goal before half-time17%
TuskerLeopards
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
TuskerLeopards
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TuskerLeopards

2nd half

21%Min. 1 goal after half-time28%
TuskerLeopards
7%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
TuskerLeopards
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
TuskerLeopards

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tusker is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Tusker · 1 pts / match - Leopards

Tusker - half-time state
14% leading69% draw17% trailing
Leopards - half-time state
3% leading90% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1
TuskerLeopards
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.1
TuskerLeopards
0.28Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
TuskerLeopards
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.24
TuskerLeopards
83%Clean sheet before half-time86%
TuskerLeopards
83%No goal before half-time90%
TuskerLeopards

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.31
TuskerLeopards
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
TuskerLeopards
0.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
TuskerLeopards
0.28Average goals (2nd half)0.55
TuskerLeopards
93%Clean sheet after half-time86%
TuskerLeopards
79%No goal after half-time76%
TuskerLeopards

Tusker - second-half results

14% W86% R0% P
32
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding293%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Leopards - second-half results

17% W79% R3% P
29
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding1967%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Leopards - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.4
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
14
20
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Leopards
ScoredConceded
25
15
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (25 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Leopards

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 66% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

TuskerLigaLeopards
Average goals in match 1.762.01 2.03
Both teams scored 34%43% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%33% 34%
Clean sheets 38%36% 52%
Goal before half-time 31%21% 17%
Goal after half-time 21%22% 28%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tusker 0 - 0 - 1 Leopards. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Tusker vs Leopards?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Tusker 0:4 Leopards. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tusker vs Leopards?

Tusker score 0.83 goals per game on average and Leopards 1.31. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 34% of Tusker's matches and 34% of Leopards's.

What form are Tusker and Leopards in?

Over the last 5 games Tusker have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Leopards 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tusker vs Leopards?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.