Germany - 3. LigaData current as of September 07, 2026

Ulm vs Saarbrucken: match statistics

Ulm crest
Ulm
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Saarbrucken crest
Saarbrucken
135%(2.88)
X40%(3.30)
225%(2.20)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams from the lower part of the table. Ulm displays better home form with a 33% win rate and an average of 1.33 goals per match at home, while Saarbrucken has only an 8% away win rate and averages 0.92 goals scored. A key factor is Saarbrucken's high draw percentage (42% away) and their recent form with two draws in five matches. Both teams have an identical goal difference of -8 in their matches, confirming their similar level. Ulm has an advantage in possession (52%) and better shooting accuracy (13% vs 9%), but Saarbrucken shows greater defensive stability away (1.58 goals conceded vs Ulm's 2.0 at home). Considering all factors, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome of this match.

Ulm vs Saarbrucken: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ulm played against Saarbrucken in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Ulm has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Saarbrucken has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Ulm scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 2.08. Saarbrucken scores 1.33 and allows 1.46. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Ulm's games and 67% of Saarbrucken's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 46%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Saarbrucken has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.36 per game. Ulm takes 11.2 shots per game, while Saarbrucken takes 12.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Ulm leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Saarbrucken leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.58 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ulm's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Saarbrucken, it is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3. Liga games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams from the lower part of the table. Ulm displays better home form with a 33% win rate and an average of 1.33 goals per match at home, while Saarbrucken has only an 8% away win rate and averages 0.92 goals scored. A key factor is Saarbrucken's high draw percentage (42% away) and their recent form with two draws in five matches. Both teams have an identical goal difference of -8 in their matches, confirming their similar level. Ulm has an advantage in possession (52%) and better shooting accuracy (13% vs 9%), but Saarbrucken shows greater defensive stability away (1.58 goals conceded vs Ulm's 2.0 at home). Considering all factors, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome of this match.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
UlmSaarbrucken
12Shots8
UlmSaarbrucken
7Shots on target2
UlmSaarbrucken
2.02xG1.08
UlmSaarbrucken
6Corners3
UlmSaarbrucken
105Dangerous attacks58
UlmSaarbrucken
7Fouls10
UlmSaarbrucken
0Cards2
UlmSaarbrucken

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.33Goals scored / game1.33
UlmSaarbrucken
2.08Goals allowed / game1.46
UlmSaarbrucken
51%Average possession48%
UlmSaarbrucken
3.67Shots on target / game4.54
UlmSaarbrucken

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.17Shots per game12.5
UlmSaarbrucken
3.67Shots on target4.54
UlmSaarbrucken
11.9%Shot conversion10.7%
UlmSaarbrucken
51%Possession48%
UlmSaarbrucken
1.36xG for1.53
UlmSaarbrucken
1.7xG against1.59
UlmSaarbrucken

Shooting quality

Ulm: BalancedSaarbrucken: Balanced
UlmSaarbrucken
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ulm is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Ulm · 1 pts / game - Saarbrucken

Ulm
LWWLL
Season result split
29% W4% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-16
0.92 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Saarbrucken
DLLDW
Season result split
25% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-9
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saarbrucken is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.08 goals / game - Ulm · 1.46 goals / game - Saarbrucken

Ulm scoring profile: very strong

Ulm scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 meczów), while Saarbrucken keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 meczów).

Saarbrucken scoring profile: very strong

Saarbrucken scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)32
UlmSaarbrucken
50Goals conceded (season)35
UlmSaarbrucken
3.42Average goals per game2.79
UlmSaarbrucken
6Goals scored (last 5)3
UlmSaarbrucken
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
UlmSaarbrucken

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal71%
UlmSaarbrucken
25%2 goals42%
UlmSaarbrucken
17%3 goals17%
UlmSaarbrucken
4%4 goals4%
UlmSaarbrucken

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal88%
UlmSaarbrucken
58%2 goals42%
UlmSaarbrucken
38%3 goals13%
UlmSaarbrucken
17%4 goals4%
UlmSaarbrucken

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time25%
UlmSaarbrucken
8%BTTS in both halves8%
UlmSaarbrucken
17%Scored in both halves25%
UlmSaarbrucken

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
UlmSaarbrucken
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UlmSaarbrucken
40%BTTS - last 520%
UlmSaarbrucken

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
UlmSaarbrucken
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
UlmSaarbrucken
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
UlmSaarbrucken

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
UlmSaarbrucken
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
UlmSaarbrucken
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
UlmSaarbrucken

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Saarbrucken is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / game - Ulm · 1.25 pts / game - Saarbrucken

Ulm - half-time state
17% leading29% draw54% trailing
Saarbrucken - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per game (1st half)1.25
UlmSaarbrucken
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.75
UlmSaarbrucken
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
UlmSaarbrucken
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.54
UlmSaarbrucken
29%Clean sheet before half-time46%
UlmSaarbrucken
58%No goal before half-time46%
UlmSaarbrucken

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.25
UlmSaarbrucken
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
UlmSaarbrucken
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
UlmSaarbrucken
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.25
UlmSaarbrucken
42%Clean sheet after half-time50%
UlmSaarbrucken
42%No goal after half-time58%
UlmSaarbrucken

Ulm - second-half results

21% W38% R42% P
19
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Saarbrucken - second-half results

29% W38% R33% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ulm - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Saarbrucken - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.0
Average goals per game1.00.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ulm
ScoredConceded
1
8
0-15
5
11
16-30
6
6
31-45
8
8
46-60
4
8
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Saarbrucken
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
6
6
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ulm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Saarbrucken

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

UlmLigaSaarbrucken
Average goals per game 3.423.16 2.79
Both teams scored 67%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%64% 46%
Clean sheets 17%22% 13%
Goal before half-time 83%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 79%84% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SaarbruckenYellow cardFlorian Pick
  2. SaarbruckenYellow cardJoel Bichsel
  3. SaarbruckenGoalPatrick SontheimerAssist: Calogero Rizzuto
  4. UlmSubstitutionOn: André BeckerOff: Jonathan Meier
  5. SaarbruckenSubstitutionOn: Sebastian VasiliadisOff: Abdoulaye Kamara
  6. SaarbruckenSubstitutionOn: Sven SonnenbergOff: Rodney Elongo-Yombo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Felix GrundMatches officiated: 13
4.62Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins31%Draws31%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Ulm's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Saarbrucken. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

1. FC Saarbrucken
3 : 1
SSV Ulm 1846

FAQ

What was the result of Ulm vs Saarbrucken?

The 3. Liga match finished Ulm 1:1 Saarbrucken. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ulm vs Saarbrucken?

Ulm score 1.33 goals per game on average and Saarbrucken 1.33. The 3. Liga average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Ulm's matches and 67% of Saarbrucken's.

What form are Ulm and Saarbrucken in?

Over the last 5 games Ulm have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Saarbrucken 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulm vs Saarbrucken?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ulm vs Saarbrucken: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.