Ulm vs Viktoria Köln: match statistics
Ulm vs Viktoria Köln: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ulm played against Viktoria Köln in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Ulm has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Viktoria Köln has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Ulm scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 2.06. Viktoria Köln scores 1.37 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 3.15 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 74% of Ulm's games and 49% of Viktoria Köln's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 54%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ulm has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.41 per game. Ulm takes 12.0 shots per game, while Viktoria Köln takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Ulm leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Viktoria Köln leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ulm's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Viktoria Köln, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.15 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Viktoria Köln holds a statistical edge: they sit 11th versus Ulm’s 18th and have recorded 14 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 9. In the last 5 matches the visitors scored 7 goals and won 3 games, averaging 1.8 points per match, while Ulm also scored 7 goals but managed only 2 wins and averaged 1.4 points per match. Defensively Ulm looks weaker — they concede 1.88 goals per home match, while Viktoria concedes 1.47 away; in the last 5 fixtures Ulm shipped 10 goals versus 8 for the visitors. Ulm do create slightly more chances (on average 11.59 shots and 4.29 on target at home, xG 1.46) and have a lower share of goalless matches (18% vs 35% for Viktoria), but the visitors have higher shot efficiency (13% vs 11%) and more clean sheets away (24% vs 18%). Considering the visitors’ more stable form (1.8 points per match vs 1.4) and Ulm’s weaker defense, I expect a Viktoria Köln victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes: in the last 5 matches Ulm had BTTS in 80% of games and Viktoria Köln in 60%, yielding an average 70% short-term support for both teams to score. Season and league context also support this — league BTTS rate is 64%, while season values for Ulm and Viktoria are 50% and 47% respectively. The xG and attacking profiles align with this scenario: Ulm has xG 1.52 while Viktoria concedes xG against 1.56; Viktoria has xG 1.30 and Ulm concedes xG against 1.27; both sides generate on average 5.17 and 4.06 shots on target per match. Ulm’s defense is particularly vulnerable — 72 goals conceded in the season and an average 2.0 goals conceded in the last 5 matches, while Viktoria concedes 1.6 goals in the last 5 — together this increases the likelihood that both teams will find the net. Based on this I estimate BTTS at 70% (Yes) vs 30% (No), as the combination of L5 form, the league 64% BTTS and consistent xG and shots on target stats provides a strong signal for both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect 1.54 goals for Ulm (xG_for_home 1.52 vs xG_against_away 1.56) and 1.29 for Viktoria Köln (xG_for_away 1.30 vs xG_against_home 1.27), totaling ~2.83 goals. Season metrics confirm strong potential for Over 1.5: Ulm has 72% of matches over 1.5, Viktoria 82%, and a Poisson model with lambda=1.54/1.29 gives about a 78% chance of Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line both teams have seasonal overs of 50% (Ulm) and 59% (Viktoria), and the model estimate is ~54% for Over 2.5 — a moderate signal, but weaker than for 1.5. For 3.5 seasonal overs are only 33% and 29%, and the model gives ~32% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 (~68%) is the clear favorite.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast Ulm to lead at the break and win the match (HT/FT 1/1). Ulm shows superior xG metrics: xG is 1.52 versus 1.30 for Viktoria Köln while conceding fewer xG (1.27 vs 1.56), indicating a qualitative advantage for the home side. Over the season Ulm averages 1.5 points per home game versus 1.18 for away teams and wins 44% of matches compared to 35% for Viktoria, so the hosts are the favorites to win. Although Viktoria led at the break in 41% of matches (vs 33% for Ulm) and has a higher average goals by half-time (0.76 vs 0.56), Ulm scores more after the break — 0.83 second-half goals vs 0.59 for the visitors — and registers more shots on target (5.17 vs 4.06), which supports scoring decisive goals after the break. Considering the higher xG efficiency and better points return for the hosts, I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 outcome (24%), with the remaining scenarios holding smaller shares.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ulm | Viktoria Köln | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Viktoria Köln is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Ulm · 1.8 pts / game - Viktoria Köln
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Viktoria Köln is 5% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - Ulm · 1.37 goals / game - Viktoria Köln
Viktoria Köln is 47% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.06 goals / game - Ulm · 1.4 goals / game - Viktoria Köln
Ulm scores in 89% of games (31 of 35 meczów), while Viktoria Köln keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 35 meczów).
Viktoria Köln scores in 69% of games (24 of 35 meczów), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulm
Over / Under - Viktoria Köln
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Viktoria Köln is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / game - Ulm · 1.37 pts / game - Viktoria Köln
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Viktoria Köln - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ulm
Viktoria Köln
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Ulm | Liga | Viktoria Köln | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.37 | 3.15 | ▼ 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 64% | ▼ 49% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | • 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 83% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Ulm's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Viktoria Köln. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulm vs Viktoria Köln?
The 3. Liga match finished Ulm 0:2 Viktoria Köln. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulm vs Viktoria Köln?
Ulm score 1.31 goals per game on average and Viktoria Köln 1.37. The 3. Liga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Ulm's matches and 49% of Viktoria Köln's.
What form are Ulm and Viktoria Köln in?
Over the last 5 games Ulm have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Viktoria Köln 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulm vs Viktoria Köln?
The statistical background for Ulm vs Viktoria Köln — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


