Ulsan vs Jeju United: match statistics
Ulsan vs Jeju United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ulsan played against Jeju United in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Ulsan has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Jeju United has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Ulsan scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 1.32. Jeju United scores 1.05 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 51% of Ulsan's games and 57% of Jeju United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 46%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ulsan has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.53 per game. Ulsan takes 14.5 shots per game, while Jeju United takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Ulsan leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Jeju United leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ulsan's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For Jeju United, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ulsan | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ulsan is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Ulsan · 0.8 pts / game - Jeju United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulsan is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Ulsan · 1.05 goals / game - Jeju United
Ulsan is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.32 goals / game - Ulsan · 1.43 goals / game - Jeju United
Ulsan scores in 76% of games (28 of 37 meczów), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 37 meczów).
Jeju United scores in 70% of games (26 of 37 meczów), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulsan
Over / Under - Jeju United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jeju United is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.19 pts / game - Jeju United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulsan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Jeju United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ulsan
Jeju United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Ulsan | Liga | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.46 | 2.55 | • 2.49 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 51% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 78% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Ulsan's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Jeju United. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulsan vs Jeju United?
The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 0:1 Jeju United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Jeju United?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 3, Jeju United won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Jeju United?
Ulsan score 1.14 goals per game on average and Jeju United 1.05. The K League 1 average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Ulsan's matches and 57% of Jeju United's.
What form are Ulsan and Jeju United in?
Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jeju United 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Jeju United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.