Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Union Omaha played against Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The game was played on May 24, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Union Omaha has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Union Omaha scores 1.78 goals per game and allows 1.11. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.80 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Union Omaha's games and 80% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 80%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Union Omaha has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.42 per game. Union Omaha takes 14.7 shots per game, while Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Union Omaha leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 1.11 goals per game after halftime. Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Union Omaha's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Chattanooga Red Wolves, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Union Omaha is the clear favorite: they sit 1st in the table and have won 80% of home matches with 0% defeats, averaging 2 goals per home game and an average xG of 2.01 at home. They hold a pronounced advantage in control and chance creation — average possession 61% vs 30% for Chattanooga, 17 shots and 6 on target per match vs 10.67 shots and 3.67 on target for the visitors, translating into higher xG (2.01 vs 1.26). Defensively the hosts concede 1 goal per home game and keep 40% clean sheets, while Chattanooga concedes 1.67 goals away and has 0% clean sheets. The visitors, however, are efficient with limited opportunities — shot conversion 16% vs 12% for the hosts and an average 1.67 goals away indicates they can capitalise on chances. Considering Union’s 9 goals in the last 5 matches vs Chattanooga’s 6 and recent form points per game (last 5) 2 for the hosts vs 0.8 for the visitors, I predict a Union Omaha win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is that the visitors have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, while the hosts show 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches (50% across the season). Both teams consistently score and concede: Union Omaha averages 2.0 goals scored and 1.0 conceded per match, and Chattanooga 1.67 scored and 1.67 conceded. Chance quality also favors goals — hosts xG 1.66 vs visitors 1.26, with an average of 5.0 shots on target for Union Omaha and 3.67 for Chattanooga, indicating realistic scoring opportunities on both ends. Additionally, both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, the league records BTTS at 57%, and the visitors have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals; therefore the most likely scenario is 'both teams to score' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis indicates a combined expected total of 2.83 goals: Union Omaha has an expected xG of 1.61 (attacking xG 1.66 vs Chattanooga’s defensive average 1.56), and Chattanooga 1.22 (attacking xG 1.26 vs Union’s defense 1.18). Across the season the league averages 2.77 goals per match, Chattanooga has 100% of matches over 2.5 this season, and Union 50% on the season and 80% in the last 5 matches, supporting an Over 2.5 scenario. Additionally, BTTS rates are high: Chattanooga 100% season-to-date and Union 50% season-to-date (in the last 5 matches BTTS Union 80% vs Chattanooga 60%), which increases the probability of goals from both sides. Offensively Union averages 11.5 shots and 5.0 on target with a 17% conversion, Chattanooga 10.67 shots and 3.67 on target with a 16% conversion — these figures align with the projected xG 2.83. On this basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (clear edge: combined xG 2.83 and Chattanooga 100% of matches over 1.5), therefore the recommendation is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict an X/1 scenario (draw at Half-Time, Union Omaha win Full-Time) because in the last 5 matches Union Omaha were level at the break in 60% of games versus 20% for Chattanooga. The home side shows a clear advantage after the break: average goals in second halves over the last 5 matches are 2.2 for Union Omaha versus 1.0 for their opponents, and the hosts have won 60% of second halves. Additionally, Union have a higher xG of 1.66 versus 1.26 and average 5.0 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 3.67, which suggests a greater ability to convert chances into goals after the interval. Chattanooga, however, have 100% BTTS on the road, so I expect the visitors to score as well, but the balance of numbers and the second-half form favor a turnaround for the hosts to take the lead and win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Union Omaha | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Union Omaha is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Union Omaha · 1.4 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Union Omaha is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.11 goals / game - Union Omaha · 1.4 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Union Omaha scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 meczów), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Union Omaha
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Union Omaha · 1.4 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Union Omaha - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Union Omaha
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Union Omaha | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.89 | 2.75 | ▲ 3.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Union Omaha's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Chattanooga Red Wolves. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 2:0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 1, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Union Omaha score 1.78 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.80. The USL League One average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Union Omaha's matches and 80% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Union Omaha and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


