Union Omaha vs Naples: match statistics
Union Omaha vs Naples: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Union Omaha played against Naples in USL League One (United States). The game was played on May 31, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Union Omaha has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Naples has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Union Omaha scores 1.82 goals per game and allows 1.00. Naples scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Union Omaha's games and 27% of Naples's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 27%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Union Omaha has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.37 per game. Union Omaha takes 14.9 shots per game, while Naples takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Union Omaha leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 1.27 goals per game after halftime. Naples leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Union Omaha's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Naples, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL League One games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Union Omaha possesses a clear home advantage: at home they average 2.00 goals scored and concede 0.83, with an average xG of 2.03 versus opponents’ xG of 0.97. The hosts average 17.33 shots per match and 6 on target, converting 12% of chances, while Naples on the road register just 10.5 shots and 2.75 on target with a 7% conversion. Union Omaha have not had a goalless home game (0% of home matches without a goal), whereas Naples failed to score in 25% of away matches and average only 0.75 goals away. Form also favors the hosts: in the last 5 matches Union Omaha average 2.0 points (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), while Naples average 0.8 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses). Considering the xG differential (2.03 vs 1.21), the difference in chances (17.33 vs 10.5) and the home goal differential (+7 vs -2), I forecast a Union Omaha victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season stats are mixed: Union Omaha has a season BTTS rate of 14%, while Naples sits at 50%, and the league BTTS is 56%. The case against BTTS is strong — Union Omaha records clean sheets in 57% of matches and concedes an average of 0.86 goals per game, while Naples scores only 0.75 goals per game (11 goals this season), suggesting opponents often fail to score. In favor of BTTS is the short-term form: in the last 5 matches Union Omaha had BTTS in 80% of games and conceded on average 1.8 goals, and Naples is generating xG of 1.5 per game recently despite scoring only 3 goals in those five matches (0.6 per game). Considering the heavier weight of Union’s seasonal defensive data (57% clean sheets and 0.86 conceded) and Naples’ poor season scoring efficiency (0.75 goals/game), I lean to a No bet with 60% probability versus 40% for Yes (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive metrics, I expect a total goal tally of around 2.55. Union Omaha has an attacking xG of 1.45 versus Naples’ xG conceded of 1.33, implying roughly 1.45 goals for the home side; Naples’ attacking xG is 1.21 versus Union Omaha’s xG conceded of 1.09 — about 1.10 goals for the visitors. Seasonal indicators show a propensity for matches with at least 2 goals: seasonOver15 = 57% for Union Omaha and 75% for Naples (average 66%), and in the last 5 matches Union Omaha has 80% of games over 2.5. The hosts average 4.14 shots on target with a 10% conversion rate versus the visitors’ 2.75 and 7%, which increases the likelihood of chances being converted. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (78%), Over 2.5 is assessed as moderate (52%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (18%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Union Omaha holds a clear statistical advantage: they average 1.14 goals per match versus Naples’ 0.75, with average xG of 1.45 against 1.21; the hosts register 4.14 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 2.75. At half-time Union Omaha averages 0.57 goals scored and 0.43 conceded, leading at the break in 43% of matches (3 instances), while Naples scores only 0.25 in the first half and is behind at half-time in 75% of cases (3 times). Therefore the strongest signal is the hosts holding the lead at 45 minutes. Over full matches the hosts win 57% of games and keep a clean sheet in 57% of matches; the percentage of games with both teams scoring is only 14% for Union Omaha versus 50% for Naples, suggesting that when the hosts lead at half-time they frequently see out the victory. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Union Omaha has a 60% win rate versus 20% for Naples, so the most reliable HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (hosts lead at half-time and win the match).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Union Omaha | Naples | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Union Omaha is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Union Omaha · 0.8 pts / game - Naples
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Union Omaha is 82% better for: goals scored per game.
1.82 goals / game - Union Omaha · 1 goals / game - Naples
Union Omaha scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while Naples keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).
Naples scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Union Omaha
Over / Under - Naples
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Union Omaha - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Naples - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Union Omaha
Naples
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Union Omaha | Liga | Naples | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.82 | 2.80 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 56% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 58% | ▼ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 71% | ▲ 91% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Union Omaha's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Naples. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Union Omaha vs Naples?
The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 2:1 Naples. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Naples?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 1, Naples won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Naples?
Union Omaha score 1.82 goals per game on average and Naples 1.00. The USL League One average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Union Omaha's matches and 27% of Naples's.
What form are Union Omaha and Naples in?
Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Naples 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Naples?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Union Omaha vs Naples: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.