United States - USL League OneData current as of 23 July 2026

Union Omaha vs Portland Hearts of Pine: match statistics

Union Omaha vs Portland Hearts of Pine: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Union Omaha play Portland Hearts of Pine in USL League One (United States). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Union Omaha: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Portland Hearts of Pine: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Union Omaha scores 1.61 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Portland Hearts of Pine scores 1.53 and concedes 1.65. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Union Omaha 61%, Portland Hearts of Pine 76%. Over 2.5: Union Omaha 61%, Portland Hearts of Pine 71%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.46. Union Omaha: 15.8 shots per match, Portland Hearts of Pine: 11.9.

Match halves

Union Omaha: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.11. Portland Hearts of Pine: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 1.06.

Goals by minute

Union Omaha: 76-90+ (12 goals). Portland Hearts of Pine: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 2-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1). Union Omaha are 100% at home and sit 2nd; at their stadium they average 2.0 goals scored and 0.75 conceded with xG 1.82 and 16 shots per match, 6 on target. Portland Hearts of Pine are 7th, averaging 0.75 goals away with xG 0.95, 7 shots (2.5 on target) and fail to score in 75% of away matches. In the last 5 matches the hosts have 3 wins, 6 goals for and 4 against, with an average of 1.8 points per match; the visitors have 1 win, 6 goals for and 7 against, averaging 1.2 points per match over the same period. Key advantages for Union are superior xG (1.82 vs 0.95), higher shot volume (16 vs 7) and no goalless home games (0% vs 75% for the away side); I therefore assign the hosts a 72% probability.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

75Possession (%)25
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
21Shots3
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
6Shots on target2
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
2.75xG0.49
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
11Corners1
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
139Dangerous attacks21
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
12Fouls15
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
2Cards3
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.61Goals scored / match1.53
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.17Goals conceded / match1.65
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
58%Average possession51%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
5.67Shots on target / match4.24
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.78Shots per match11.88
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
5.67Shots on target4.24
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
10.2%Shot conversion12.9%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
58%Possession51%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.88xG for1.46
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.37xG against1.78
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

Shooting quality

Union Omaha: DominantPortland Hearts of Pine: Balanced
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Union Omaha is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Union Omaha · 1.2 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Union Omaha
LLWDW
Season result split
61% W11% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-2-5
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.07Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Portland Hearts of Pine
LWWLL
Season result split
29% W29% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-7
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.61 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.53 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Union Omaha is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.65 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Union Omaha scoring profile: very strong

Union Omaha scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Portland Hearts of Pine keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

Portland Hearts of Pine scoring profile: very strong

Portland Hearts of Pine scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

29Goals scored (season)26
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
21Goals conceded (season)28
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
2.78Average goals in match3.18
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal76%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
67%2 goals41%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
17%3 goals24%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0%4 goals6%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal88%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
33%2 goals47%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0%3 goals18%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0%4 goals6%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

76%
Portland Hearts of Pine - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 17 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time12%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
11%BTTS in both halves0%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
28%Scored in both halves18%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time41%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Union Omaha - half-time state
17% leading61% draw22% trailing
Portland Hearts of Pine - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.12
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.06Average goals (1st half)1
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
50%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
61%No goal before half-time65%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

After half-time (2nd half)

1.72Points per match (2nd half)1.12
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)1.06
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)1.12
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
1.72Average goals (2nd half)2.18
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
44%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine
33%No goal after half-time41%
Union OmahaPortland Hearts of Pine

Union Omaha - second-half results

50% W22% R28% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding359%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Hearts of Pine - second-half results

24% W41% R35% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Union Omaha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Portland Hearts of Pine - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.41.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.63.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%80%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
6
2
16-30
1
4
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Portland Hearts of Pine
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
2
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Portland Hearts of Pine

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Union OmahaLigaPortland Hearts of Pine
Average goals in match 2.782.86 3.18
Both teams scored 61%55% 76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%60% 71%
Clean sheets 17%26% 12%
Goal before half-time 61%72% 65%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+60%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Union Omaha 2 - 1 - 1 Portland Hearts of Pine. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Portland Hearts of Pine
1 : 2
Union Omaha
Union Omaha
1 : 0
Portland Hearts of Pine SC
Portland Hearts of Pine SC
3 : 1
Union Omaha
Union Omaha
2 : 2
Portland Hearts of Pine SC

FAQ

What was the result of Union Omaha vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 2:2 Portland Hearts of Pine. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Portland Hearts of Pine?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 2, Portland Hearts of Pine won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

Union Omaha score 1.61 goals per game on average and Portland Hearts of Pine 1.53. The USL League One average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Union Omaha's matches and 76% of Portland Hearts of Pine's.

What form are Union Omaha and Portland Hearts of Pine in?

Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Portland Hearts of Pine 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Union Omaha vs Portland Hearts of Pine: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.