United States - USL League OneData current as of September 06, 2026

Union Omaha vs Sarasota Paradise: match statistics

Union Omaha vs Sarasota Paradise: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Union Omaha played against Sarasota Paradise in USL League One (United States). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Union Omaha has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Sarasota Paradise has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Union Omaha scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.10. Sarasota Paradise scores 1.05 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Union Omaha's games and 57% of Sarasota Paradise's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 57%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Union Omaha has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.50 per game. Union Omaha takes 16.3 shots per game, while Sarasota Paradise takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Union Omaha leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Sarasota Paradise leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Union Omaha's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Sarasota Paradise, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Union Omaha lead the home table and win 80% of their matches on home soil, remaining unbeaten, while Sarasota Paradise have lost 73% of their away games and have won just once in 11 such appearances. The hosts average 2.4 goals at home with an xG of 2.21, registering 18.7 shots and 7.2 on target per match; away from home, the visitors score just 0.64 goals. The disparity is further reflected in current form: Union Omaha have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals and conceding 5, while Sarasota have failed to win any of theirs, managing just 2 goals and conceding 10. The visitors’ defense allows an average of 1.91 goals away from home, while their 45% rate of matches without scoring further limits their chances of an upset. The hosts’ superiority in chance creation, finishing and consistency of results clearly points to a Union Omaha victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Union Omaha has a high seasonal BTTS rate of 67%, with both teams scoring in 80% of their last five matches. However, the key issue for the BTTS - Yes scenario is Sarasota Paradise’s attack: the team averages just 0.64 goals per match and has scored only 2 goals in its last five appearances, or 0.4 per game. The visitors have failed to score in 45% of their matches this season, while Union Omaha has conceded just 1.0 goal per game over its last five fixtures, with an against xG of 1.02. The hosts should create plenty of chances, given their recent xG of 2.24, while Sarasota concedes an average of 2.0 goals across its last five matches. Nevertheless, a home win with a clean sheet appears more likely than both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Union Omaha are in excellent attacking form: they have scored 14 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.8 per game, with an xG of 2.24. Over the same period, Sarasota Paradise have conceded 10 goals, an average of 2.0 per match, while their average xG conceded stands at 1.56, supporting the expectation of at least two goals from the hosts. The visitors have scored a modest 0.64 goals per game this season and just 0.4 across their last five outings, but their xG is 1.41, meaning a single goal remains a realistic possibility. The Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 78% of Union Omaha matches and 73% of Sarasota’s games, making Over 1.5 the strongest data-backed selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Union Omaha are significantly stronger in terms of current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.8 goals, while Sarasota have failed to win any of their last five games and have scored just 0.4 goals per match. The hosts were leading at the break in 75% of their recent matches, whereas the visitors have never taken the lead before half-time and have not scored a single goal during that period. Omaha’s advantage is also evident in their attacking quality, as they create an average of 1.57 xG and register 5.0 shots on target per match, compared with Sarasota’s shooting efficiency of just 5%. After the break, the hosts should continue to control the match, having scored an average of 1.25 goals across their last five games, while Sarasota have lost 73% of their matches this season. The most likely scenario is therefore that Union Omaha will establish a lead before half-time and hold on to it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
19Shots13
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
6Shots on target2
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
2.52xG1.29
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
7Corners5
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
127Dangerous attacks46
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
14Fouls13
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
5Cards3
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.86Goals scored / game1.05
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.1Goals allowed / game1.67
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
58%Average possession50%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
6Shots on target / game4.19
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.29Shots per game12.9
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
6Shots on target4.19
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
11.4%Shot conversion8.1%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
58%Possession50%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.93xG for1.5
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.3xG against1.37
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

Shooting quality

Union Omaha: DominantSarasota Paradise: Balanced
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Union Omaha is 160% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Union Omaha · 1 pts / game - Sarasota Paradise

Union Omaha
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W10% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-2-5
2.10 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.27Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Sarasota Paradise
DDLLW
Season result split
29% W14% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-12
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 77% better for: goals scored per game.

1.86 goals / game - Union Omaha · 1.05 goals / game - Sarasota Paradise

Union Omaha is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.1 goals / game - Union Omaha · 1.67 goals / game - Sarasota Paradise

Union Omaha scoring profile: very strong

Union Omaha scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 meczów), while Sarasota Paradise keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).

Sarasota Paradise scoring profile: very strong

Sarasota Paradise scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 meczów).

39Goals scored (season)22
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
23Goals conceded (season)35
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
2.95Average goals per game2.71
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
14Goals scored (last 5)5
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal71%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
71%2 goals29%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
24%3 goals5%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
5%4 goals0%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal76%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
29%2 goals57%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
0%3 goals24%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
0%4 goals10%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
Sarasota Paradise - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 21 meczów
57%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time19%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
10%BTTS in both halves0%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
33%Scored in both halves10%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
80%BTTS - last 560%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time48%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Union Omaha is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / game - Union Omaha · 1 pts / game - Sarasota Paradise

Union Omaha - half-time state
24% leading57% draw19% trailing
Sarasota Paradise - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per game (1st half)1
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.05
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
52%Clean sheet before half-time62%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
57%No goal before half-time71%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

After half-time (2nd half)

1.81Points per game (2nd half)1
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
48%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise
33%No goal after half-time48%
Union OmahaSarasota Paradise

Union Omaha - second-half results

52% W24% R24% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding279%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sarasota Paradise - second-half results

24% W29% R48% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Union Omaha - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.80
Goals scored / game1.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game2.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Sarasota Paradise - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
7
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
14
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

Sarasota Paradise
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
2
5
16-30
5
4
31-45
5
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Sarasota Paradise

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Union OmahaLigaSarasota Paradise
Average goals per game 2.952.91 2.71
Both teams scored 62%57% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%60% 57%
Clean sheets 19%25% 24%
Goal before half-time 62%70% 48%
Goal after half-time 90%79% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sarasota ParadiseGoalCallum StretchAssist: Andres Rodriguez
  2. Union OmahaYellow cardMarlon Vargas
  3. Sarasota ParadiseYellow cardEmiliano Franco Terzaghi
  4. Sarasota ParadiseYellow cardAndres Rodriguez
  5. Union OmahaYellow cardBrent Kallman
  6. Sarasota ParadiseSubstitutionOn: Sean KaraniOff: Emiliano Franco Terzaghi
  7. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Edrey CaceresOff: Diego Gutiérrez
  8. Union OmahaYellow cardYounes Boudadi
  9. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Adrian BillhardtOff: Sergio Ors Navarro
  10. Sarasota ParadiseYellow cardSean Karani
  11. Union OmahaYellow cardAdrian Billhardt
  12. Union OmahaYellow cardPato Botello Faz

Head-to-head

Record from Union Omaha's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sarasota Paradise. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Union Omaha vs Sarasota Paradise?

The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 1:1 Sarasota Paradise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Sarasota Paradise?

Union Omaha score 1.86 goals per game on average and Sarasota Paradise 1.05. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Union Omaha's matches and 57% of Sarasota Paradise's.

What form are Union Omaha and Sarasota Paradise in?

Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Sarasota Paradise 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Sarasota Paradise?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Union Omaha vs Sarasota Paradise: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.