Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

URA vs Entebbe UPPC: match statistics

URA crest
URA
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Entebbe UPPC crest
Entebbe UPPC
130%(2.13)
X25%(3.29)
245%(2.98)

Entebbe UPPC displays significantly better form than URA, confirmed by 2 points per game in the last 5 matches compared to just 0.6 points for the hosts. The visitors sit in 6th place with a record of 6 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses, while URA is ranked 12th with only 2 wins this season. URA is going through a very poor run—a streak of 4 consecutive losses and 10 goals conceded in the last 5 matches indicates serious defensive problems. Entebbe has an impressive 50% win rate in away matches and concedes an average of just 1 goal per game, which, given the hosts' weak defense, gives them a clear advantage. The visitors' form (lwdww) and defensive solidity (3 goals conceded in the last 5 matches) argue for an away victory.

URA vs Entebbe UPPC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

URA play Entebbe UPPC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 13 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Entebbe UPPC: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

URA scores 0.90 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Entebbe UPPC scores 1.00 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: URA 40%, Entebbe UPPC 23%. Over 2.5: URA 27%, Entebbe UPPC 17%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.34. URA: 11.0 shots per match, Entebbe UPPC: 6.0.

Match halves

URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Entebbe UPPC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). Entebbe UPPC: 0-15 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Entebbe UPPC displays significantly better form than URA, confirmed by 2 points per game in the last 5 matches compared to just 0.6 points for the hosts. The visitors sit in 6th place with a record of 6 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses, while URA is ranked 12th with only 2 wins this season. URA is going through a very poor run—a streak of 4 consecutive losses and 10 goals conceded in the last 5 matches indicates serious defensive problems. Entebbe has an impressive 50% win rate in away matches and concedes an average of just 1 goal per game, which, given the hosts' weak defense, gives them a clear advantage. The visitors' form (lwdww) and defensive solidity (3 goals conceded in the last 5 matches) argue for an away victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
URAEntebbe UPPC
17Shots9
URAEntebbe UPPC
6Shots on target1
URAEntebbe UPPC
2.42xG1.18
URAEntebbe UPPC
4Corners3
URAEntebbe UPPC
126Dangerous attacks72
URAEntebbe UPPC
23Fouls18
URAEntebbe UPPC
0Cards0
URAEntebbe UPPC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.97Goals conceded / match0.67
URAEntebbe UPPC
51%Average possession32%
URAEntebbe UPPC
4.37Shots on target / match1.37
URAEntebbe UPPC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match6
URAEntebbe UPPC
4.37Shots on target1.37
URAEntebbe UPPC
8.2%Shot conversion16.7%
URAEntebbe UPPC
51%Possession32%
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.56xG for1.34
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.38xG against1.6
URAEntebbe UPPC

Shooting quality

URA: BalancedEntebbe UPPC: Counter-attacking
URAEntebbe UPPC
Accuracy (shots on target)40%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.22
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.73

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Entebbe UPPC is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - URA · 2.2 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC

URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Entebbe UPPC
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W30% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-7
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Entebbe UPPC is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - URA · 1 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC

Entebbe UPPC is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - URA · 0.67 goals / match - Entebbe UPPC

URA scoring profile: more difficult

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 53% (16 of 30 matches).

Entebbe UPPC scoring profile: mixed

Entebbe UPPC scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)30
URAEntebbe UPPC
29Goals conceded (season)20
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.87Average goals in match1.67
URAEntebbe UPPC
7Goals scored (last 5)9
URAEntebbe UPPC
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
URAEntebbe UPPC

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal60%
URAEntebbe UPPC
17%2 goals27%
URAEntebbe UPPC
10%3 goals7%
URAEntebbe UPPC
3%4 goals7%
URAEntebbe UPPC

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal47%
URAEntebbe UPPC
27%2 goals17%
URAEntebbe UPPC
10%3 goals3%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%4 goals0%
URAEntebbe UPPC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time7%
URAEntebbe UPPC
7%BTTS in both halves0%
URAEntebbe UPPC
13%Scored in both halves10%
URAEntebbe UPPC

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS10%
URAEntebbe UPPC
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
URAEntebbe UPPC
60%BTTS - last 520%
URAEntebbe UPPC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
URAEntebbe UPPC
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
URAEntebbe UPPC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
URAEntebbe UPPC

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time30%
URAEntebbe UPPC
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time10%
URAEntebbe UPPC
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
URAEntebbe UPPC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Entebbe UPPC is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - URA · 1.47 pts / match - Entebbe UPPC

URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing
Entebbe UPPC - half-time state
27% leading67% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.47
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.37
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.53
URAEntebbe UPPC
60%Clean sheet before half-time87%
URAEntebbe UPPC
67%No goal before half-time67%
URAEntebbe UPPC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)1.2
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.93Average goals (2nd half)0.47
URAEntebbe UPPC
60%Clean sheet after half-time87%
URAEntebbe UPPC
70%No goal after half-time83%
URAEntebbe UPPC

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Entebbe UPPC - second-half results

17% W70% R13% P
44
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Entebbe UPPC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Entebbe UPPC
ScoredConceded
14
11
0-15
1
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Entebbe UPPC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaEntebbe UPPC
Average goals in match 1.872.09 1.67
Both teams scored 40%38% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%35% 17%
Clean sheets 40%39% 53%
Goal before half-time 57%59% 40%
Goal after half-time 60%62% 30%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: URA 0 - 1 - 0 Entebbe UPPC. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of URA vs Entebbe UPPC?

The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:1 Entebbe UPPC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Entebbe UPPC?

URA score 0.90 goals per game on average and Entebbe UPPC 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 40% of URA's matches and 23% of Entebbe UPPC's.

What form are URA and Entebbe UPPC in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Entebbe UPPC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Entebbe UPPC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.