URA vs Kitara: match statistics
URA vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
URA played against Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on December 4, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
URA has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kitara has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
URA scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.13. Kitara scores 1.57 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of URA's games and 43% of Kitara's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 43%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
URA has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.63 per game. URA takes 11.6 shots per game, while Kitara takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
URA leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Kitara leads at halftime in 71% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
URA's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Kitara, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| URA | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kitara is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - URA · 2.4 pts / game - Kitara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitara is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - URA · 0.86 goals / game - Kitara
URA scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 games), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
Kitara scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - URA
Over / Under - Kitara
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitara is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - URA · 2.43 pts / game - Kitara
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
URA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 71% of games and wins 57%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
URA
Kitara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| URA | Liga | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.75 | 2.49 | • 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 51% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KitaraGoalPatrick Kaddu
FAQ
What was the result of URA vs Kitara?
The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Kitara?
URA score 1.63 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.57. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of URA's matches and 43% of Kitara's.
What form are URA and Kitara in?
Over the last 5 games URA have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kitara 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Kitara?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.