Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of October 22, 2026

URA vs SC Villa: match statistics

URA crest
URA
0 : 1half-time 0:1
SC Villa crest
SC Villa

URA vs SC Villa: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

URA played against SC Villa in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on September 4, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

URA has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. SC Villa has 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

URA scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. SC Villa scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of URA's games and 100% of SC Villa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

URA has the higher season xG average, 0.99 to 0.98 per game. URA takes 4.0 shots per game, while SC Villa takes 6.0.

First-half and second-half trends

URA leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. SC Villa leads at halftime in 100% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

URA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For SC Villa, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.20 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SC Villa sit 9th, while URA are 13th, and also boast a clearly better record in their last five matches: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat compared with URA’s 1 win and as many as 4 draws. The visitors have scored 9 goals during this period, averaging 1.8 per match, compared with URA’s 7 goals, while their points tally stands at 2.0 per game versus 1.4 for the hosts. URA are solid defensively, however, conceding just 4 goals in five matches, which makes a draw a realistic outcome. SC Villa’s defense is not flawless either, having conceded 5 goals over the same period, but their greater attacking efficiency and three wins in five appearances favor the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The latest form of both teams favors goals at both ends: URA have averaged 1.4 goals per match, while SC Villa have averaged 1.8 in their last five fixtures. Over the same period, the hosts conceded 0.8 goals per match and the visitors 1.0, creating a realistic path to a goal for either side. Their attacking potential is also supported by the average xG figures: 1.62 for URA and 1.43 for SC Villa, both higher than the respective 1.01 and 1.27 xG allowed by their opponents. BTTS - Yes landed in 60% of URA’s last five matches and as many as 80% of SC Villa’s, meaning the current data is clearly stronger than the low league-wide rate of 28%. Given the limited seasonal sample, BTTS - Yes has the edge, but it is not a risk-free signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams points to a match with goals, but without clear indications of a high-scoring game: URA averaged 1.4 goals in their last 5 matches, while SC Villa averaged 1.8. At the same time, both defenses conceded relatively few goals—0.8 and 1.0 per match, respectively—which limits the projection to around 2.33 goals. The chance-quality metrics are also moderate: URA’s xG stands at 1.62, with opponents conceding 1.27 xG, while SC Villa create 1.43 xG against 1.01 xG allowed by the hosts. Although the percentage of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals in the last five games was 40% for URA and 60% for SC Villa, the league as a whole is very low-scoring, averaging 1.43 goals with only 14% of matches going Over 2.5. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as this bet only loses if at least four goals are scored, and the defensive data and league profile do not support such an outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is for SC Villa to lead at half-time and hold on for the win, as the visitors led at the break in 75% of their recent matches, scoring an average of 1.5 goals in the first half. During the same period, URA led at half-time in only 40% of matches, while as many as 60% ended the first half level. The overall form clearly favors SC Villa: the team won 60% of its last five matches and scored an average of 1.8 goals, whereas URA recorded only 20% wins and 80% draws. The visitors conceded no goals before half-time in this sample, while URA conceded an average of 0.4 goals during that period, further strengthening the 2/2 option. However, the league’s low average of 1.43 goals per match limits confidence in the forecast and leaves a significant possibility of a half-time draw followed by an away win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

70Possession (%)30
URASC Villa
11Shots7
URASC Villa
5Shots on target4
URASC Villa
1.69xG1.17
URASC Villa
11Corners1
URASC Villa
88Dangerous attacks61
URASC Villa
16Fouls19
URASC Villa
0Cards0
URASC Villa

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1
URASC Villa
1Goals allowed / game1
URASC Villa
67%Average possession50%
URASC Villa
2Shots on target / game2
URASC Villa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

4Shots per game6
URASC Villa
2Shots on target2
URASC Villa
50%Shot conversion16.7%
URASC Villa
67%Possession50%
URASC Villa
0.99xG for0.98
URASC Villa
1.18xG against1.24
URASC Villa

Shooting quality

URA: Efficient finishingSC Villa: Efficient finishing
URASC Villa
Accuracy (shots on target)50%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

URA is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - URA · 1 pts / game - SC Villa

URA
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
SC Villa
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

URA is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - URA · 1 goals / game - SC Villa

URA scoring profile: very strong

URA scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while SC Villa keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).

SC Villa scoring profile: very strong

SC Villa scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 games).

2Goals scored (season)1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded (season)1
URASC Villa
3Average goals per game2
URASC Villa
2Goals scored (last 5)1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
URASC Villa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
URASC Villa
100%2 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%3 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%4 goals0%
URASC Villa

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
URASC Villa
0%2 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%3 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%4 goals0%
URASC Villa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
URASC Villa
0%Scored in both halves0%
URASC Villa

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
URASC Villa
100%BTTS - last 5100%
URASC Villa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
URASC Villa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
URASC Villa
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
URASC Villa

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

URA - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
SC Villa - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per game (1st half)3
URASC Villa
0Goals scored (1st half)1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
URASC Villa
1Average goals (1st half)1
URASC Villa
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
URASC Villa
100%No goal before half-time0%
URASC Villa

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per game (2nd half)0
URASC Villa
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
URASC Villa
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
URASC Villa
2Average goals (2nd half)1
URASC Villa
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%No goal after half-time100%
URASC Villa

URA - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-1.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SC Villa - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

URA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.003.00
Goals scored / game0.02.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
SC Villa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.000.00
Goals scored / game1.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

SC Villa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

SC Villa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaSC Villa
Average goals per game▲ 3.002.20▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%47%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%40%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%30%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%53%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%73%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / game
1.07
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Frank SsebuufuA 1
—Reagan Mpande⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SC VillaGoalReagan MpandeAssist: Frank Ssebuufu

Head-to-head

Record from URA's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against SC Villa. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of URA vs SC Villa?

The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:1 SC Villa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between URA and SC Villa?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches URA won 0, SC Villa won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs SC Villa?

URA score 2.00 goals per game on average and SC Villa 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 100% of URA's matches and 100% of SC Villa's.

What form are URA and SC Villa in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and SC Villa 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs SC Villa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs SC Villa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.