URA vs Vipers: match statistics
Vipers SC presents decidedly better form and statistics this season, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 8 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses. The visiting team shows particular defensive solidity in away matches, conceding an average of just 0.4 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 60% of away games. URA, meanwhile, sits in 12th position in the table and presents poor form, losing 4 of the last 5 matches overall with a points balance of 0.6 PPG. The hosts have not kept a clean sheet in any home match this season, which, given Vipers' efficiency (1.4 goals on average away), puts them in a disadvantageous situation. The difference in quality between the two teams, confirmed by both table position and xG indicators (2.1 vs 1.91 for attack, 1.33 vs 1.48 for defense), speaks for a win for the league leaders.
URA vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
URA played against Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on January 23, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
URA has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Vipers has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
URA scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.25. Vipers scores 1.91 and allows 0.55. Games in this league average 2.30 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of URA's games and 55% of Vipers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 45%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vipers has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.72 per game. URA takes 11.6 shots per game, while Vipers takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
URA leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. Vipers leads at halftime in 55% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
URA's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Vipers, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.30 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vipers SC presents decidedly better form and statistics this season, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 8 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses. The visiting team shows particular defensive solidity in away matches, conceding an average of just 0.4 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 60% of away games. URA, meanwhile, sits in 12th position in the table and presents poor form, losing 4 of the last 5 matches overall with a points balance of 0.6 PPG. The hosts have not kept a clean sheet in any home match this season, which, given Vipers' efficiency (1.4 goals on average away), puts them in a disadvantageous situation. The difference in quality between the two teams, confirmed by both table position and xG indicators (2.1 vs 1.91 for attack, 1.33 vs 1.48 for defense), speaks for a win for the league leaders.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| URA | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vipers is 267% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - URA · 2.2 pts / game - Vipers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vipers is 77% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - URA · 1.91 goals / game - Vipers
Vipers is 127% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - URA · 0.55 goals / game - Vipers
URA scores in 42% of games (5 of 12 games), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 games).
Vipers scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - URA
Over / Under - Vipers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vipers is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - URA · 2 pts / game - Vipers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
URA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Vipers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 55% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
URA
Vipers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| URA | Liga | Vipers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.33 | 2.30 | ▲ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 45% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 41% | ▲ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 33% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 61% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- VipersGoalAbdul Karim Watambala
FAQ
What was the result of URA vs Vipers?
The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:2 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Vipers?
URA score 1.08 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.91. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 42% of URA's matches and 55% of Vipers's.
What form are URA and Vipers in?
Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Vipers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Vipers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs Vipers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.