Japan - J1 LeagueSaitama Stadium 2002Data current as of September 19, 2026

Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama: match statistics

Urawa Reds crest
Urawa Reds
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Fagiano Okayama crest
Fagiano Okayama

Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Urawa Reds played against Fagiano Okayama in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Saitama Stadium 2002. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Urawa Reds has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Fagiano Okayama has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Urawa Reds scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 2.50. Fagiano Okayama scores 1.33 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 83% of Urawa Reds's games and 67% of Fagiano Okayama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 67%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fagiano Okayama has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.62 per game. Urawa Reds takes 15.7 shots per game, while Fagiano Okayama takes 16.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Urawa Reds leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Fagiano Okayama leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Urawa Reds's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Fagiano Okayama, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Urawa Reds are in noticeably better current form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in the process, while Fagiano Okayama have recorded 3 wins, a draw and a defeat. The hosts average 2 goals per game at home and have scored in every such outing, which could exploit the fact that the visitors concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home. Okayama do, however, create high-quality chances, as evidenced by their away xG of 1.70 alongside just 1.10 xG conceded defensively, as well as an average of 16.67 shots per match. Urawa’s biggest issue is their defense: at home, they allow opponents an xG of 2.06 and concede as many as 3 goals per game, without keeping a single clean sheet. Urawa’s advantage in form and attacking efficiency gives the hosts a slight edge, but their high vulnerability at the back means an away victory remains a very realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is reinforced by their current form: in their last 5 matches, Urawa averaged 2.2 goals and Okayama 1.8, with a BTTS rate of 60% for both teams. During this period, the hosts conceded 1.4 goals per match, while their average xG against was 1.50, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring. Okayama have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season and allow opponents an average of 1.67 goals, while Urawa create chances worth 1.66 xG. Caution is warranted due to Urawa’s highly solid defensive record throughout the season, with an average of just 0.67 goals conceded and 67% clean sheets, but the more recent data point more clearly towards a BTTS - Yes scenario at 59%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams clearly points toward goals: Urawa have scored an average of 2.2 goals in their last five matches, while Okayama have averaged 1.8. Over the same period, the hosts conceded 1.4 goals per game, compared with 1.0 for the visitors, providing a solid basis for expecting chances at both ends. Their attacking potential also remains high, with average xG figures from the last five matches of 1.83 for Urawa and 1.52 for Okayama. Okayama concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home, while Urawa register 16.33 shots per match at home, so the hosts should significantly increase the likelihood of at least two goals in total. Over 1.5 is the safest choice, as the last five matches for each team produced over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases, although the Over 2.5 line already carries greater variance.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw followed by a Urawa victory is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 2 of their 3 matches so far, as were Fagiano. Urawa average 2.33 points per match and remain unbeaten, while Okayama average just 1.00 point and have lost 67% of their matches. The hosts’ defensive record is also crucial: they concede only 0.67 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their appearances, compared with the visitors’ average of 1.67 goals conceded and no clean sheets. After the break, Urawa score an average of 0.67 goals, rising to 1.00 over their last five matches, which supports a turnaround after an evenly balanced opening. Despite similar xG figures—1.66 for Urawa and 1.70 for Okayama—the hosts’ superior results and significantly more stable defense point to the X/1 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
11Shots12
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1Shots on target3
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1.04xG1.23
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
4Corners8
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
39Dangerous attacks38
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
10Fouls10
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1Cards3
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
2Goals scored / game1.33
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
2.5Goals allowed / game1.17
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%Average possession44%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
4.5Shots on target / game3.5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.67Shots per game16.5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
4.5Shots on target3.5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
12.8%Shot conversion8.1%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%Possession44%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1.62xG for1.68
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1.84xG against1.12
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

Shooting quality

Urawa Reds: AttackingFagiano Okayama: Attacking
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
Accuracy (shots on target)29%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Fagiano Okayama is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Urawa Reds · 2 pts / game - Fagiano Okayama

Urawa Reds
LLWWW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-3
1.50 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Fagiano Okayama
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Urawa Reds is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Urawa Reds · 1.33 goals / game - Fagiano Okayama

Fagiano Okayama is 114% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.5 goals / game - Urawa Reds · 1.17 goals / game - Fagiano Okayama

Urawa Reds scoring profile: very strong

Urawa Reds scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Fagiano Okayama keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

Fagiano Okayama scoring profile: very strong

Fagiano Okayama scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Urawa Reds keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).

12Goals scored (season)8
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
15Goals conceded (season)7
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
4.5Average goals per game2.5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
9Goals scored (last 5)7
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%2 goals33%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%3 goals17%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
0%4 goals0%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
83%2 goals50%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%3 goals0%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
33%4 goals0%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

83%BTTS at half-time67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
33%BTTS in both halves17%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%Scored in both halves33%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

BTTS and goal count

83%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
80%BTTS - last 560%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
83%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
83%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fagiano Okayama is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / game - Urawa Reds · 1.17 pts / game - Fagiano Okayama

Urawa Reds - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Fagiano Okayama - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per game (1st half)1.17
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1Goals scored (1st half)0.83
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
2.33Average goals (1st half)1.67
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
17%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
0%No goal before half-time33%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
2.17Average goals (2nd half)0.83
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama
50%No goal after half-time50%
Urawa RedsFagiano Okayama

Urawa Reds - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
5
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Fagiano Okayama - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Urawa Reds - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game2.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 5
Fagiano Okayama - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.60
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Urawa Reds
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
2
5
31-45
0
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Fagiano Okayama
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Urawa Reds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
184%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Fagiano Okayama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Urawa RedsLigaFagiano Okayama
Average goals per game 4.502.97 2.50
Both teams scored 83%59% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%54% 67%
Clean sheets 17%22% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 83%86% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Urawa RedsSubstitutionOn: Kota KudoOff: Danilo Boza Junior
  2. Fagiano OkayamaGoalHiroshi OmoriAssist: Haruka Motoyama
  3. Urawa RedsGoalHarumi MinaminoAssist: Tatsuki Seko
  4. Fagiano OkayamaYellow cardEiji Miyamoto
  5. Fagiano OkayamaYellow cardLucas Marcos Meireles
  6. Fagiano OkayamaSubstitutionOn: Leonardo Andriel dos SantosOff: Lucas Marcos Meireles
  7. Fagiano OkayamaYellow cardHaruka Motoyama
  8. Urawa RedsYellow cardHayate Ueki
  9. Fagiano OkayamaSubstitutionOn: Daichi TagamiOff: Eiji Miyamoto
  10. Urawa RedsSubstitutionOn: Shuta SasaOff: Hayate Ueki
  11. Fagiano OkayamaGoalYugo TatsutaAssist: Noakenshin Browne

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Urawa Reds's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Fagiano Okayama. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Fagiano Okayama
0 : 1
Urawa Red Diamonds
Urawa Red Diamonds
1 : 0
Fagiano Okayama

FAQ

What was the result of Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama?

The J1 League match finished Urawa Reds 1:2 Fagiano Okayama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Urawa Reds and Fagiano Okayama?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Urawa Reds won 2, Fagiano Okayama won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama?

Urawa Reds score 2.00 goals per game on average and Fagiano Okayama 1.33. The J1 League average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Urawa Reds's matches and 67% of Fagiano Okayama's.

What form are Urawa Reds and Fagiano Okayama in?

Over the last 5 games Urawa Reds have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Fagiano Okayama 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.