Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama: match statistics
Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Urawa Reds played against Fagiano Okayama in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Saitama Stadium 2002. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Urawa Reds has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Fagiano Okayama has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Urawa Reds scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 2.50. Fagiano Okayama scores 1.33 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 83% of Urawa Reds's games and 67% of Fagiano Okayama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 67%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fagiano Okayama has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.62 per game. Urawa Reds takes 15.7 shots per game, while Fagiano Okayama takes 16.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Urawa Reds leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Fagiano Okayama leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Urawa Reds's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Fagiano Okayama, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Urawa Reds are in noticeably better current form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in the process, while Fagiano Okayama have recorded 3 wins, a draw and a defeat. The hosts average 2 goals per game at home and have scored in every such outing, which could exploit the fact that the visitors concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home. Okayama do, however, create high-quality chances, as evidenced by their away xG of 1.70 alongside just 1.10 xG conceded defensively, as well as an average of 16.67 shots per match. Urawa’s biggest issue is their defense: at home, they allow opponents an xG of 2.06 and concede as many as 3 goals per game, without keeping a single clean sheet. Urawa’s advantage in form and attacking efficiency gives the hosts a slight edge, but their high vulnerability at the back means an away victory remains a very realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for both teams to score is reinforced by their current form: in their last 5 matches, Urawa averaged 2.2 goals and Okayama 1.8, with a BTTS rate of 60% for both teams. During this period, the hosts conceded 1.4 goals per match, while their average xG against was 1.50, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring. Okayama have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season and allow opponents an average of 1.67 goals, while Urawa create chances worth 1.66 xG. Caution is warranted due to Urawa’s highly solid defensive record throughout the season, with an average of just 0.67 goals conceded and 67% clean sheets, but the more recent data point more clearly towards a BTTS - Yes scenario at 59%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The latest form of both teams clearly points toward goals: Urawa have scored an average of 2.2 goals in their last five matches, while Okayama have averaged 1.8. Over the same period, the hosts conceded 1.4 goals per game, compared with 1.0 for the visitors, providing a solid basis for expecting chances at both ends. Their attacking potential also remains high, with average xG figures from the last five matches of 1.83 for Urawa and 1.52 for Okayama. Okayama concede an average of 1.67 goals away from home, while Urawa register 16.33 shots per match at home, so the hosts should significantly increase the likelihood of at least two goals in total. Over 1.5 is the safest choice, as the last five matches for each team produced over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases, although the Over 2.5 line already carries greater variance.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw followed by a Urawa victory is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 2 of their 3 matches so far, as were Fagiano. Urawa average 2.33 points per match and remain unbeaten, while Okayama average just 1.00 point and have lost 67% of their matches. The hosts’ defensive record is also crucial: they concede only 0.67 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their appearances, compared with the visitors’ average of 1.67 goals conceded and no clean sheets. After the break, Urawa score an average of 0.67 goals, rising to 1.00 over their last five matches, which supports a turnaround after an evenly balanced opening. Despite similar xG figures—1.66 for Urawa and 1.70 for Okayama—the hosts’ superior results and significantly more stable defense point to the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Urawa Reds | Fagiano Okayama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 21% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fagiano Okayama is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Urawa Reds · 2 pts / game - Fagiano Okayama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Urawa Reds is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Urawa Reds · 1.33 goals / game - Fagiano Okayama
Fagiano Okayama is 114% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.5 goals / game - Urawa Reds · 1.17 goals / game - Fagiano Okayama
Urawa Reds scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Fagiano Okayama keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
Fagiano Okayama scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Urawa Reds keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Urawa Reds
Over / Under - Fagiano Okayama
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fagiano Okayama is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / game - Urawa Reds · 1.17 pts / game - Fagiano Okayama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Urawa Reds - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fagiano Okayama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Urawa Reds
Fagiano Okayama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Urawa Reds | Liga | Fagiano Okayama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.50 | 2.97 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 54% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 22% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 86% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Urawa Reds's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Fagiano Okayama. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama?
The J1 League match finished Urawa Reds 1:2 Fagiano Okayama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Urawa Reds and Fagiano Okayama?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Urawa Reds won 2, Fagiano Okayama won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama?
Urawa Reds score 2.00 goals per game on average and Fagiano Okayama 1.33. The J1 League average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Urawa Reds's matches and 67% of Fagiano Okayama's.
What form are Urawa Reds and Fagiano Okayama in?
Over the last 5 games Urawa Reds have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Fagiano Okayama 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Urawa Reds vs Fagiano Okayama: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


