Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
US Biskra vs MC Alger: match statistics
US Biskra vs MC Alger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
US Biskra plays MC Alger in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Complexe Sportif d'El Alia.
Recent form
US Biskra has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. MC Alger has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.
Scoring records
US Biskra scores 0.40 goals per game and allows 1.60. MC Alger scores 1.33 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 20% of US Biskra's games and 33% of MC Alger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 0%, compared with league averages of 28% for BTTS and 25% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MC Alger has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 0.80 per game. US Biskra takes 4.2 shots per game, while MC Alger takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
US Biskra leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. MC Alger leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
US Biskra's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For MC Alger, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligue 1 games average 2.08 goals. Both teams score in 28% of games, and 25% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| US Biskra | MC Alger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 55% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
MC Alger is 483% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - US Biskra · 2.33 pts / game - MC Alger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MC Alger is 233% better for: goals scored per game.
0.4 goals / game - US Biskra · 1.33 goals / game - MC Alger
MC Alger is 385% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - US Biskra · 0.33 goals / game - MC Alger
US Biskra scores in 20% of games (1 of 5 games), while MC Alger keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).
MC Alger scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while US Biskra keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - US Biskra
Over / Under - MC Alger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MC Alger is 94% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - US Biskra · 2.33 pts / game - MC Alger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
US Biskra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
MC Alger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
US Biskra
MC Alger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| US Biskra | Liga | MC Alger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.00 | 2.08 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 42% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.