Algeria - Ligue 1Data current as of September 06, 2026

USM Alger vs Paradou AC: match statistics

USM Alger crest
USM Alger
4 : 2half-time 1:1
Paradou AC crest
Paradou AC

USM Alger vs Paradou AC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

USM Alger played against Paradou AC in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Final score: 4:2.

Recent form

USM Alger has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Paradou AC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

USM Alger scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.79. Paradou AC scores 1.18 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 2.23 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of USM Alger's games and 50% of Paradou AC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

USM Alger has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.11 per game. USM Alger takes 10.8 shots per game, while Paradou AC takes 7.4.

First-half and second-half trends

USM Alger leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Paradou AC leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.64 after halftime.

When the teams score

USM Alger's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Paradou AC, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligue 1 games average 2.23 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match favorite is USM Alger (home win), primarily due to defensive superiority and game control: the hosts concede only 0.69 goals per home match on average, while Paradou concede 1.93 on the road. USM also posts significantly better chance-quality metrics – average xG for the hosts at home is 1.87 versus Paradou's 1.01 xG away, and the hosts average 13.15 shots (6.54 on target) compared to 6.86 (3.36 on target) for the visitors. Paradou have scored more goals this season (33 vs 24) and have 8 goals in the last 5 matches versus USM's 5, but that is offset by their poor defense (48 goals conceded this season and only 7% clean sheets away). Additionally, USM have been collecting more points recently (2.0 points per match in the last 5 vs 1.4 for Paradou) and at home suffer only 15% defeats with 46% clean sheets, while Paradou lose 79% of away fixtures. Considering defensive stability and superiority in chance quality, I assess a 60% probability of a home win, 25% for a draw and 15% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Paradou AC has a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% versus 43% for USM Alger, with a league average of 48%, tilting slightly in favor of the Both Teams To Score scenario. USM at home scores 1.29 and concedes 1.50 per match, Paradou away scores 1.07 and concedes 1.93; both teams generate xG above 1.00 (USM 1.22, Paradou 1.01) while allowing xG against of 1.55 and 1.48 respectively, so there are goal-scoring opportunities on both sides. The difference in clean sheet percentages is significant: USM has 36% clean sheets, Paradou only 7%, meaning Paradou rarerly finishes matches without conceding and more often contributes to BTTS. In the last 5 matches BTTS for the home side is 40% and for the away side 60%, and numerically both teams scored 5 (USM) and 8 (Paradou) goals while conceding 3 and 7 in their last 5 games, which further supports the 'both to score' scenario. Summing these data points (seasonal 43%/57%, clean sheets 36%/7%, recent form 40%/60% and xG 1.22/1.01 against 1.55/1.48) yields my assessment of 60% for BTTS - Yes and 40% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: USM has xG_for 1.22, Paradou 1.01, and xG_against 1.55 (USM) and 1.48 (Paradou); averaging these values yields expected xG of 1.35 for the home side and 1.28 for the visitors, totaling 2.63 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.63 gives roughly a 74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 49% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Match stats confirm this: USM averages 8.62 shots and 4.46 on target, Paradou 6.86 and 3.36; with a conversion rate of 16% this yields approximately 1.38 and 1.10 goals from shots, consistent with the calculated xG. Season percentages show 71% of matches for both teams finished Over 1.5 (USM 71%, Paradou 71%), while only 43% of home matches and 57% of away matches exceeded 2.5 goals, which explains the lower confidence for Over 2.5 (~49%). Based on xG=1.35 vs 1.28, shot counts and seasonal percentages, I recommend Over 1.5 as the best and least risky line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

USM Alger averages 1.29 goals scored and concedes 1.50 per match this season, while Paradou records 1.07 scored and 1.93 conceded; the home side’s xG is 1.22 versus 1.01 for the visitors, and the hosts average 4.46 shots on target compared to 3.36 for Paradou, indicating an advantage in chance creation. At half-time USM led in 29% of matches this season and in 40% of their last five (2 of 5), whereas Paradou led in only 21% this season and 20% of their last five (1 of 5), so the probability of the hosts holding the lead at the break is higher. Paradou have a 79% loss rate away and average 0.5 points per away match, while USM earn 1.21 points per home match and have a 60% win rate in their last five, which increases the likelihood they will maintain a win through full-time. Additionally, USM keep a clean sheet at half-time in 43% of matches season-to-date and have superior average xG and shots on target; average goals by half are 0.57 for the hosts versus 0.5 for the visitors. Therefore the most realistic scenario is the home side leading at half-time and winning the match (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
3 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
USM AlgerParadou AC
14Shots9
USM AlgerParadou AC
4Shots on target6
USM AlgerParadou AC
1.54xG1.47
USM AlgerParadou AC
3Corners4
USM AlgerParadou AC
52Dangerous attacks66
USM AlgerParadou AC
14Fouls9
USM AlgerParadou AC
2Cards1
USM AlgerParadou AC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

USM AlgerParadou AC
1Goals scored / game1.18
USM AlgerParadou AC
0.79Goals allowed / game1.71
USM AlgerParadou AC
52%Average possession45%
USM AlgerParadou AC
5.17Shots on target / game3.71
USM AlgerParadou AC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.79Shots per game7.39
USM AlgerParadou AC
5.17Shots on target3.71
USM AlgerParadou AC
9.3%Shot conversion15.9%
USM AlgerParadou AC
52%Possession45%
USM AlgerParadou AC
1.66xG for1.11
USM AlgerParadou AC
1.12xG against1.51
USM AlgerParadou AC

Shooting quality

USM Alger: BalancedParadou AC: Counter-attacking
USM AlgerParadou AC
Accuracy (shots on target)48%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Paradou AC is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - USM Alger · 1.4 pts / game - Paradou AC

USM Alger
LLLDW
Season result split
29% W50% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-12-5
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Paradou AC
LDWWL
Season result split
25% W11% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-18
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-11
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paradou AC is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - USM Alger · 1.18 goals / game - Paradou AC

USM Alger is 116% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.79 goals / game - USM Alger · 1.71 goals / game - Paradou AC

USM Alger scoring profile: very strong

USM Alger scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while Paradou AC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 meczów).

Paradou AC scoring profile: strong

Paradou AC scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while USM Alger keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)33
USM AlgerParadou AC
19Goals conceded (season)48
USM AlgerParadou AC
1.79Average goals per game2.89
USM AlgerParadou AC
3Goals scored (last 5)8
USM AlgerParadou AC
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
USM AlgerParadou AC

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
USM AlgerParadou AC
25%2 goals32%
USM AlgerParadou AC
4%3 goals11%
USM AlgerParadou AC
0%4 goals4%
USM AlgerParadou AC

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal79%
USM AlgerParadou AC
17%2 goals57%
USM AlgerParadou AC
0%3 goals25%
USM AlgerParadou AC
0%4 goals7%
USM AlgerParadou AC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
USM AlgerParadou AC
4%BTTS in both halves18%
USM AlgerParadou AC
17%Scored in both halves21%
USM AlgerParadou AC

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
USM AlgerParadou AC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
USM AlgerParadou AC
40%BTTS - last 560%
USM AlgerParadou AC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
USM AlgerParadou AC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
USM AlgerParadou AC
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
USM AlgerParadou AC

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
USM AlgerParadou AC
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
USM AlgerParadou AC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
USM AlgerParadou AC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

USM Alger is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - USM Alger · 0.96 pts / game - Paradou AC

USM Alger - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Paradou AC - half-time state
25% leading21% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)0.96
USM AlgerParadou AC
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.54
USM AlgerParadou AC
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
USM AlgerParadou AC
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.46
USM AlgerParadou AC
58%Clean sheet before half-time36%
USM AlgerParadou AC
54%No goal before half-time61%
USM AlgerParadou AC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.29
USM AlgerParadou AC
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
USM AlgerParadou AC
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
USM AlgerParadou AC
0.75Average goals (2nd half)1.43
USM AlgerParadou AC
67%Clean sheet after half-time46%
USM AlgerParadou AC
58%No goal after half-time50%
USM AlgerParadou AC

USM Alger - second-half results

17% W75% R8% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Paradou AC - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

USM Alger - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.40.2
1 goal100%20%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Paradou AC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.60
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

USM Alger
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Paradou AC
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
2
14
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

USM Alger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Paradou AC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

USM AlgerLigaParadou AC
Average goals per game 1.792.23 2.89
Both teams scored 50%48% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%38% 50%
Clean sheets 38%30% 21%
Goal before half-time 67%64% 82%
Goal after half-time 50%71% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
0.90
Away goals / game
+48%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defensive advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. USM AlgerGoalAhmed KhaldiAssist: Saadi Radouani
  2. USM AlgerYellow cardIlyes Chetti
  3. Paradou ACSubstitutionOn: Mohamed KohiliOff: Yassine Ben Hamed
  4. USM AlgerGoalGlody LikonzaAssist: Brahim Benzaza
  5. USM AlgerYellow cardImadeddine Azzi
  6. USM AlgerGoalRiad Benayad
  7. USM AlgerSubstitutionOn: Achref AbadaOff: Ilyes Chetti
  8. USM AlgerGoalRiad BenayadAssist: Zakaria Draoui
  9. Paradou ACYellow cardMohamed Imed Reguig

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tayeb BenyabkaMatches officiated: 8
0.75Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins13%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from USM Alger's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Paradou AC. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Paradou AC
0 : 1
USM Alger

FAQ

What was the result of USM Alger vs Paradou AC?

The Ligue 1 match finished USM Alger 4:2 Paradou AC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before USM Alger vs Paradou AC?

USM Alger score 1.00 goals per game on average and Paradou AC 1.18. The Ligue 1 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of USM Alger's matches and 50% of Paradou AC's.

What form are USM Alger and Paradou AC in?

Over the last 5 games USM Alger have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Paradou AC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for USM Alger vs Paradou AC?

The statistical background for USM Alger vs Paradou AC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.