Romania - Liga IData current as of September 11, 2026

UTA Arad vs CFR Cluj: match statistics

UTA Arad crest
UTA Arad
0 : 1half-time 0:0
CFR Cluj crest
CFR Cluj
130%(2.70)
X28%(3.20)
242%(2.28)

CFR Cluj approaches this meeting in outstanding form, winning all five of their last matches and scoring an impressive 13 goals during this period. Their offensive effectiveness (11% shot conversion away) exceeds that of UTA Arad (9% in home matches), and they also score more goals on average away (1.25) than the hosts do at home (1.33), with the visitors' recent form being decisively better. UTA Arad has a balanced goal difference at home (difference 0), but their home form is unstable with 42% wins and 25% losses. Despite a lower position in the table (9th place), CFR Cluj shows much better disposition in recent weeks, confirmed by 3 points per match in the last five meetings compared to UTA's 2 points. Considering the form advantage, offensive potential, and mental edge resulting from the winning streak, CFR Cluj has higher chances of winning, though UTA's stability in home matches makes a draw also realistic.

UTA Arad vs CFR Cluj: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

UTA Arad played against CFR Cluj in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on February 4, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

UTA Arad has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. CFR Cluj has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

UTA Arad scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.33. CFR Cluj scores 1.58 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of UTA Arad's games and 67% of CFR Cluj's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 58%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

CFR Cluj has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.49 per game. UTA Arad takes 13.5 shots per game, while CFR Cluj takes 14.2.

First-half and second-half trends

UTA Arad leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. CFR Cluj leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.88 after halftime.

When the teams score

UTA Arad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For CFR Cluj, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga I games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CFR Cluj approaches this meeting in outstanding form, winning all five of their last matches and scoring an impressive 13 goals during this period. Their offensive effectiveness (11% shot conversion away) exceeds that of UTA Arad (9% in home matches), and they also score more goals on average away (1.25) than the hosts do at home (1.33), with the visitors' recent form being decisively better. UTA Arad has a balanced goal difference at home (difference 0), but their home form is unstable with 42% wins and 25% losses. Despite a lower position in the table (9th place), CFR Cluj shows much better disposition in recent weeks, confirmed by 3 points per match in the last five meetings compared to UTA's 2 points. Considering the form advantage, offensive potential, and mental edge resulting from the winning streak, CFR Cluj has higher chances of winning, though UTA's stability in home matches makes a draw also realistic.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
UTA AradCFR Cluj
7Shots12
UTA AradCFR Cluj
2Shots on target4
UTA AradCFR Cluj
1.02xG1.22
UTA AradCFR Cluj
2Corners2
UTA AradCFR Cluj
59Dangerous attacks25
UTA AradCFR Cluj
13Fouls10
UTA AradCFR Cluj
2Cards5
UTA AradCFR Cluj

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.29Goals scored / game1.58
UTA AradCFR Cluj
1.33Goals allowed / game1.5
UTA AradCFR Cluj
46%Average possession49%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
4.42Shots on target / game6.04
UTA AradCFR Cluj

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.46Shots per game14.17
UTA AradCFR Cluj
4.42Shots on target6.04
UTA AradCFR Cluj
9.6%Shot conversion11.2%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
46%Possession49%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
1.49xG for1.65
UTA AradCFR Cluj
1.57xG against1.38
UTA AradCFR Cluj

Shooting quality

UTA Arad: BalancedCFR Cluj: Attacking
UTA AradCFR Cluj
Accuracy (shots on target)33%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CFR Cluj is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - UTA Arad · 3 pts / game - CFR Cluj

UTA Arad
DWWLW
Season result split
42% W33% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-6
1.58 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CFR Cluj
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
38% W33% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-7
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CFR Cluj is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

1.29 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.58 goals / game - CFR Cluj

UTA Arad is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.5 goals / game - CFR Cluj

UTA Arad scoring profile: very strong

UTA Arad scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while CFR Cluj keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 meczów).

CFR Cluj scoring profile: very strong

CFR Cluj scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 meczów), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)38
UTA AradCFR Cluj
32Goals conceded (season)36
UTA AradCFR Cluj
2.63Average goals per game3.08
UTA AradCFR Cluj
8Goals scored (last 5)13
UTA AradCFR Cluj
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
UTA AradCFR Cluj

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal83%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
38%2 goals46%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
13%3 goals21%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
0%4 goals8%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal83%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
33%2 goals46%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
17%3 goals17%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
8%4 goals4%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time38%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
0%BTTS in both halves13%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
25%Scored in both halves33%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
60%BTTS - last 560%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CFR Cluj is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / game - UTA Arad · 1.38 pts / game - CFR Cluj

UTA Arad - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
CFR Cluj - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per game (1st half)1.38
UTA AradCFR Cluj
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.71
UTA AradCFR Cluj
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
UTA AradCFR Cluj
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.54
UTA AradCFR Cluj
54%Clean sheet before half-time38%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
50%No goal before half-time42%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per game (2nd half)1.42
UTA AradCFR Cluj
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
UTA AradCFR Cluj
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
UTA AradCFR Cluj
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.54
UTA AradCFR Cluj
50%Clean sheet after half-time46%
UTA AradCFR Cluj
46%No goal after half-time42%
UTA AradCFR Cluj

UTA Arad - second-half results

46% W21% D33% L
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding168%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CFR Cluj - second-half results

38% W29% D33% L
33
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

UTA Arad - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.40
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
CFR Cluj - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.602.20
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+4+5
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

CFR Cluj
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
12
31-45
7
8
46-60
7
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

CFR Cluj

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

UTA AradLigaCFR Cluj
Average goals per game 2.632.50 3.08
Both teams scored 58%49% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%45% 58%
Clean sheets 25%29% 17%
Goal before half-time 71%69% 83%
Goal after half-time 88%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CFR ClujYellow cardDamjan Đoković
  2. UTA AradYellow cardSabahudin Alomeroviс
  3. CFR ClujYellow cardAndrei Cordea
  4. CFR ClujSubstitutionOn: Alibek AlievOff: Islam Slimani
  5. CFR ClujYellow cardChristopher Braun
  6. CFR ClujSubstitutionOn: Ali AbeidOff: Christopher Braun
  7. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Hakim Djamel AbdallahOff: Alin Roman
  8. CFR ClujGoalMeriton KorenicaAssist: Alibek Aliev
  9. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Marinos TzionisOff: Luka Gojković
  10. CFR ClujYellow cardTidiane Keita
  11. CFR ClujYellow cardMihai Popa
  12. UTA AradYellow cardMark Țuțu
  13. CFR ClujSubstitutionOn: Luka ZahovičOff: Andrei Cordea
  14. CFR ClujSubstitutionOn: Ciprian Ioan DeacOff: Meriton Korenica

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Szabolcs KovacsMatches officiated: 23
4.17Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 252%Home wins22%Draws26%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from UTA Arad's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against CFR Cluj. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

SCS CFR 1907 Cluj
1 : 1
AFC UTA Arad

FAQ

What was the result of UTA Arad vs CFR Cluj?

The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 0:1 CFR Cluj. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs CFR Cluj?

UTA Arad score 1.29 goals per game on average and CFR Cluj 1.58. The Liga I average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 58% of UTA Arad's matches and 67% of CFR Cluj's.

What form are UTA Arad and CFR Cluj in?

Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CFR Cluj 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs CFR Cluj?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs CFR Cluj: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.