Romania - Liga IData current as of September 11, 2026

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics

UTA Arad crest
UTA Arad
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Csikszereda crest
Csikszereda

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

UTA Arad played against Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

UTA Arad has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Csikszereda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

UTA Arad scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.38. Csikszereda scores 1.05 and allows 1.76. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of UTA Arad's games and 54% of Csikszereda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 49% and 51%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

UTA Arad has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.25 per game. UTA Arad takes 13.4 shots per game, while Csikszereda takes 11.2.

First-half and second-half trends

UTA Arad leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Csikszereda leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.49 after halftime.

When the teams score

UTA Arad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Csikszereda, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga I games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win for UTA Arad. UTA averages 1.63 goals per home match with average xG of 1.56, while Csikszereda scores only 0.74 goals away and has an xG of 1.09, indicating a clear home advantage in quality of chances created. Defensively the visitors are weak — Csikszereda concedes 2.32 goals on average away with xG against of 1.85, whereas UTA concedes 1.37 at home and keeps a clean sheet in 32% of home matches. UTA also produces more shots (14.16 vs 9.79) and more shots on target (4.42 vs 3.74) with finishing rates of 12% versus the visitors’ 8%, and the visitors fail to score in 42% of their away games (hosts fail to score in 26% of home matches). Although Csikszereda have won 3 of their last 5 and average 2.0 points per match compared to UTA’s 2 wins and 1.6 points, the visitors’ season-long away record (63% losses and -30 goal difference on the road) leads me to assign 65% probability to the home side, 20% to a draw and 15% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season statistics favor the 'Both Teams To Score' scenario: UTA Arad has BTTS at 67% at home, while Csikszereda records 42% away, and the league average BTTS is 52%. UTA scores an average of 1.39 goals per home match with xG 1.41 and 51 goals this season, while the visitors concede as many as 2.32 goals per match and have 65 goals conceded — a strong signal that the home side should find the net. Conversely, the visitors' scoring chance is less obvious: Csikszereda has only 0.74 goals per season and a shot conversion around 8%, but in the last 5 matches they have xG 1.45 and have scored 5 goals (1.0 average), which increases the likelihood of them scoring. Both teams allow high xG against (1.84 and 1.85), and UTA at home averages more shots (12.72 with 4.39 on target) than the visitors (9.79 and 3.74), which favors open play and goal exchanges. On this basis I give a stronger signal for BTTS — 65% for 'Yes' versus 35% for 'No', because the high home BTTS rate and the visitors' defensive vulnerability outweigh the visitors' weaker season scoring metrics.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I recommend Over 1.5 as the main pick: UTA Arad have 83% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Csikszereda 74%, and the league averages 2.54 goals per game, which strongly signals at least two goals (I rate Over 1.5 at 88%). Expected goals were calculated by combining xG and seasonal averages: for the home side xG_for 1.41 vs guests' xG_against 1.85 yields 1.63, while seasonal figures (1.39 scored vs 2.32 conceded by the visitors) give 1.86; their average is ~1.74 goals for UTA. For Csikszereda similarly xG_for 1.09 and hosts' xG_against 1.84 give 1.47, while seasonal values (0.74 scored vs 1.17 conceded) give 0.96; the average is ~1.21 goals for the away side, totaling ~2.95 expected goals. Support comes from UTA’s activity: 12.72 shots and 4.39 on target on average vs guests' 9.79 and 3.74, and conversion rates 11% vs 8%; BTTS is 67% for the home side and 42% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of goals from both teams. As a result I assess Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~62%), Over 3.5 as less likely (~33%), so the best and strongest position is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1). UTA Arad led at the break in 28% of their matches and were level at half-time in 56%, indicating a strong probability of a draw after 45 minutes. The hosts score an average of 1.39 goals per game versus Csikszereda’s 0.74, have a higher xG (1.41 vs 1.09) and more shots (12.72 vs 9.79) and shots on target (4.39 vs 3.74), which increases the chance of a turnaround in the second half. The visitors concede an average of 1.21 goals before the break and 1.11 in the second half, so after a draw the hosts have a realistic advantage to see out the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
UTA AradCsikszereda
17Shots7
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Shots on target0
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.75xG0.56
UTA AradCsikszereda
8Corners1
UTA AradCsikszereda
55Dangerous attacks14
UTA AradCsikszereda
14Fouls16
UTA AradCsikszereda
0Cards3
UTA AradCsikszereda

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UTA AradCsikszereda
1.38Goals scored / game1.05
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.38Goals allowed / game1.76
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%Average possession41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
4.24Shots on target / game4.05
UTA AradCsikszereda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.38Shots per game11.22
UTA AradCsikszereda
4.24Shots on target4.05
UTA AradCsikszereda
10.3%Shot conversion9.4%
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%Possession41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.48xG for1.25
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.53xG against1.84
UTA AradCsikszereda

Shooting quality

UTA Arad: BalancedCsikszereda: Balanced
UTA AradCsikszereda
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Csikszereda is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - UTA Arad · 2 pts / game - Csikszereda

UTA Arad
WWLDD
Season result split
38% W32% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-12-11
1.46 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Csikszereda
LWWDW
Season result split
32% W27% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-15
1.24 pts / game · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-12
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTA Arad is 31% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.05 goals / game - Csikszereda

UTA Arad is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.38 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.76 goals / game - Csikszereda

UTA Arad scoring profile: very strong

UTA Arad scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).

Csikszereda scoring profile: very strong

Csikszereda scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 37 meczów).

51Goals scored (season)39
UTA AradCsikszereda
51Goals conceded (season)65
UTA AradCsikszereda
2.76Average goals per game2.81
UTA AradCsikszereda
9Goals scored (last 5)5
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%2 goals27%
UTA AradCsikszereda
16%3 goals5%
UTA AradCsikszereda
3%4 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal76%
UTA AradCsikszereda
35%2 goals51%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%3 goals27%
UTA AradCsikszereda
8%4 goals14%
UTA AradCsikszereda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time30%
UTA AradCsikszereda
5%BTTS in both halves11%
UTA AradCsikszereda
32%Scored in both halves16%
UTA AradCsikszereda

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
UTA AradCsikszereda
60%BTTS - last 520%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
UTA AradCsikszereda
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
UTA AradCsikszereda

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
UTA AradCsikszereda
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTA Arad is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / game - UTA Arad · 1.03 pts / game - Csikszereda

UTA Arad - half-time state
30% leading46% draw24% trailing
Csikszereda - half-time state
22% leading38% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per game (1st half)1.03
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.57
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.51
UTA AradCsikszereda
54%Clean sheet before half-time38%
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%No goal before half-time54%
UTA AradCsikszereda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per game (2nd half)1.05
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.49
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.3
UTA AradCsikszereda
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
UTA AradCsikszereda
49%No goal after half-time57%
UTA AradCsikszereda

UTA Arad - second-half results

35% W30% D35% L
50
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Csikszereda - second-half results

19% W49% D32% L
38
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

UTA Arad - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Csikszereda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
7
7
16-30
9
10
31-45
5
8
46-60
7
7
61-75
15
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Csikszereda
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
5
9
16-30
9
17
31-45
5
6
46-60
7
12
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Csikszereda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+16.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

UTA AradLigaCsikszereda
Average goals per game 2.762.54 2.81
Both teams scored 59%52% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 49%47% 51%
Clean sheets 19%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 73%68% 78%
Goal after half-time 84%76% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: László KleinheislerOff: Szabolcs Dusinszki
  2. CsikszeredaYellow cardErwin Szilard Bloj
  3. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Jozef DolnýOff: Marton Eppel
  4. CsikszeredaYellow cardLászló Kleinheisler
  5. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Marinos TzionisOff: Alin Roman
  6. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Benjamin Van DurmenOff: Denis Alberto Taroi
  7. CsikszeredaSubstitutionOn: Daniel BrüggerOff: Efraim Zoltán Bödő
  8. UTA AradSubstitutionOn: Luca Alessandro MihaiOff: Hakim Djamel Abdallah

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Viorel Nicușor FlueranMatches officiated: 13
2.23Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins31%Draws31%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from UTA Arad's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Csikszereda. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
2 : 0
AFC UTA Arad
AFC UTA Arad
0 : 0
AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc

FAQ

What was the result of UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 1:0 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 0, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

UTA Arad score 1.38 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 1.05. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of UTA Arad's matches and 54% of Csikszereda's.

What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?

Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Csikszereda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.