Romania - Liga IData current as of 22 July 2026

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics

UTA Arad crest
UTA Arad
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Csikszereda crest
Csikszereda

UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTA Arad play Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The match date is 8 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

UTA Arad: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Csikszereda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTA Arad scores 1.36 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Csikszereda scores 1.05 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTA Arad 56%, Csikszereda 51%. Over 2.5: UTA Arad 46%, Csikszereda 49%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

UTA Arad has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.24. UTA Arad: 14.0 shots per match, Csikszereda: 11.2.

Match halves

UTA Arad: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.74. Csikszereda: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.51.

Goals by minute

UTA Arad: 76-90+ (16 goals). Csikszereda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a home win for UTA Arad. UTA averages 1.63 goals per home match with average xG of 1.56, while Csikszereda scores only 0.74 goals away and has an xG of 1.09, indicating a clear home advantage in quality of chances created. Defensively the visitors are weak — Csikszereda concedes 2.32 goals on average away with xG against of 1.85, whereas UTA concedes 1.37 at home and keeps a clean sheet in 32% of home matches. UTA also produces more shots (14.16 vs 9.79) and more shots on target (4.42 vs 3.74) with finishing rates of 12% versus the visitors’ 8%, and the visitors fail to score in 42% of their away games (hosts fail to score in 26% of home matches). Although Csikszereda have won 3 of their last 5 and average 2.0 points per match compared to UTA’s 2 wins and 1.6 points, the visitors’ season-long away record (63% losses and -30 goal difference on the road) leads me to assign 65% probability to the home side, 20% to a draw and 15% to an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
UTA AradCsikszereda
17Shots7
UTA AradCsikszereda
4Shots on target0
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.75xG0.56
UTA AradCsikszereda
8Corners1
UTA AradCsikszereda
55Dangerous attacks14
UTA AradCsikszereda
14Fouls16
UTA AradCsikszereda
0Cards3
UTA AradCsikszereda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UTA AradCsikszereda
1.36Goals scored / match1.05
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.31Goals conceded / match1.69
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%Average possession41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
4.46Shots on target / match3.97
UTA AradCsikszereda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.03Shots per match11.15
UTA AradCsikszereda
4.46Shots on target3.97
UTA AradCsikszereda
9.7%Shot conversion9.4%
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%Possession41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.54xG for1.24
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.5xG against1.84
UTA AradCsikszereda

Shooting quality

UTA Arad: AttackingCsikszereda: Balanced
UTA AradCsikszereda
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Csikszereda is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - UTA Arad · 2 pts / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad
LDDWW
Season result split
41% W31% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-11
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-5-5
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Csikszereda
WDWLW
Season result split
33% W26% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-10-16
1.26 pts / match · goal difference -25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-13
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTA Arad is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - UTA Arad · 1.05 goals / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - UTA Arad · 1.69 goals / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad scoring profile: very strong

UTA Arad scores in 74% of matches (29 of 39 matches), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 39 matches).

Csikszereda scoring profile: very strong

Csikszereda scores in 72% of matches (28 of 39 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).

53Goals scored (season)41
UTA AradCsikszereda
51Goals conceded (season)66
UTA AradCsikszereda
2.67Average goals in match2.74
UTA AradCsikszereda
3Goals scored (last 5)6
UTA AradCsikszereda
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal72%
UTA AradCsikszereda
41%2 goals28%
UTA AradCsikszereda
15%3 goals5%
UTA AradCsikszereda
3%4 goals0%
UTA AradCsikszereda

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal74%
UTA AradCsikszereda
33%2 goals49%
UTA AradCsikszereda
13%3 goals26%
UTA AradCsikszereda
8%4 goals13%
UTA AradCsikszereda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time28%
UTA AradCsikszereda
5%BTTS in both halves10%
UTA AradCsikszereda
31%Scored in both halves15%
UTA AradCsikszereda

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
UTA AradCsikszereda
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
UTA AradCsikszereda
20%BTTS - last 520%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
UTA AradCsikszereda
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
UTA AradCsikszereda
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
UTA AradCsikszereda

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
UTA AradCsikszereda
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
UTA AradCsikszereda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTA Arad is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - UTA Arad · 1.03 pts / match - Csikszereda

UTA Arad - half-time state
28% leading49% draw23% trailing
Csikszereda - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.03
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.54
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.26Average goals (1st half)1.44
UTA AradCsikszereda
56%Clean sheet before half-time41%
UTA AradCsikszereda
49%No goal before half-time56%
UTA AradCsikszereda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.08
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.51
UTA AradCsikszereda
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
UTA AradCsikszereda
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.31
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%Clean sheet after half-time44%
UTA AradCsikszereda
46%No goal after half-time56%
UTA AradCsikszereda

UTA Arad - second-half results

38% W28% R33% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Csikszereda - second-half results

21% W46% R33% P
40
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTA Arad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Csikszereda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTA Arad
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
7
7
16-30
9
10
31-45
5
8
46-60
8
7
61-75
16
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Csikszereda
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
5
9
16-30
9
17
31-45
6
6
46-60
8
12
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTA Arad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Csikszereda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+16.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

UTA AradLigaCsikszereda
Average goals in match 2.672.53 2.74
Both teams scored 56%51% 51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%46% 49%
Clean sheets 23%28% 26%
Goal before half-time 69%67% 74%
Goal after half-time 85%76% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): UTA Arad 0 - 1 - 1 Csikszereda. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc
2 : 0
AFC UTA Arad
AFC UTA Arad
0 : 0
AFK Csikszereda Miercurea Ciuc

FAQ

What was the result of UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 1:0 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 0, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

UTA Arad score 1.36 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 1.05. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of UTA Arad's matches and 51% of Csikszereda's.

What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?

Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Csikszereda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.