UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: match statistics
UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
UTA Arad played against Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on May 8, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
UTA Arad has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Csikszereda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
UTA Arad scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.38. Csikszereda scores 1.05 and allows 1.76. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of UTA Arad's games and 54% of Csikszereda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 49% and 51%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
UTA Arad has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.25 per game. UTA Arad takes 13.4 shots per game, while Csikszereda takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
UTA Arad leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Csikszereda leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.49 after halftime.
When the teams score
UTA Arad's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Csikszereda, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for UTA Arad. UTA averages 1.63 goals per home match with average xG of 1.56, while Csikszereda scores only 0.74 goals away and has an xG of 1.09, indicating a clear home advantage in quality of chances created. Defensively the visitors are weak — Csikszereda concedes 2.32 goals on average away with xG against of 1.85, whereas UTA concedes 1.37 at home and keeps a clean sheet in 32% of home matches. UTA also produces more shots (14.16 vs 9.79) and more shots on target (4.42 vs 3.74) with finishing rates of 12% versus the visitors’ 8%, and the visitors fail to score in 42% of their away games (hosts fail to score in 26% of home matches). Although Csikszereda have won 3 of their last 5 and average 2.0 points per match compared to UTA’s 2 wins and 1.6 points, the visitors’ season-long away record (63% losses and -30 goal difference on the road) leads me to assign 65% probability to the home side, 20% to a draw and 15% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season statistics favor the 'Both Teams To Score' scenario: UTA Arad has BTTS at 67% at home, while Csikszereda records 42% away, and the league average BTTS is 52%. UTA scores an average of 1.39 goals per home match with xG 1.41 and 51 goals this season, while the visitors concede as many as 2.32 goals per match and have 65 goals conceded — a strong signal that the home side should find the net. Conversely, the visitors' scoring chance is less obvious: Csikszereda has only 0.74 goals per season and a shot conversion around 8%, but in the last 5 matches they have xG 1.45 and have scored 5 goals (1.0 average), which increases the likelihood of them scoring. Both teams allow high xG against (1.84 and 1.85), and UTA at home averages more shots (12.72 with 4.39 on target) than the visitors (9.79 and 3.74), which favors open play and goal exchanges. On this basis I give a stronger signal for BTTS — 65% for 'Yes' versus 35% for 'No', because the high home BTTS rate and the visitors' defensive vulnerability outweigh the visitors' weaker season scoring metrics.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I recommend Over 1.5 as the main pick: UTA Arad have 83% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Csikszereda 74%, and the league averages 2.54 goals per game, which strongly signals at least two goals (I rate Over 1.5 at 88%). Expected goals were calculated by combining xG and seasonal averages: for the home side xG_for 1.41 vs guests' xG_against 1.85 yields 1.63, while seasonal figures (1.39 scored vs 2.32 conceded by the visitors) give 1.86; their average is ~1.74 goals for UTA. For Csikszereda similarly xG_for 1.09 and hosts' xG_against 1.84 give 1.47, while seasonal values (0.74 scored vs 1.17 conceded) give 0.96; the average is ~1.21 goals for the away side, totaling ~2.95 expected goals. Support comes from UTA’s activity: 12.72 shots and 4.39 on target on average vs guests' 9.79 and 3.74, and conversion rates 11% vs 8%; BTTS is 67% for the home side and 42% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of goals from both teams. As a result I assess Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~62%), Over 3.5 as less likely (~33%), so the best and strongest position is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1). UTA Arad led at the break in 28% of their matches and were level at half-time in 56%, indicating a strong probability of a draw after 45 minutes. The hosts score an average of 1.39 goals per game versus Csikszereda’s 0.74, have a higher xG (1.41 vs 1.09) and more shots (12.72 vs 9.79) and shots on target (4.39 vs 3.74), which increases the chance of a turnaround in the second half. The visitors concede an average of 1.21 goals before the break and 1.11 in the second half, so after a draw the hosts have a realistic advantage to see out the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| UTA Arad | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Csikszereda is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - UTA Arad · 2 pts / game - Csikszereda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.05 goals / game - Csikszereda
UTA Arad is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - UTA Arad · 1.76 goals / game - Csikszereda
UTA Arad scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).
Csikszereda scores in 73% of games (27 of 37 meczów), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTA Arad
Over / Under - Csikszereda
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTA Arad is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / game - UTA Arad · 1.03 pts / game - Csikszereda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Csikszereda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
UTA Arad
Csikszereda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| UTA Arad | Liga | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.76 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 52% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 49% | 47% | ▲ 51% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from UTA Arad's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Csikszereda. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 1:0 Csikszereda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Csikszereda?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 0, Csikszereda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
UTA Arad score 1.38 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 1.05. The Liga I average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of UTA Arad's matches and 54% of Csikszereda's.
What form are UTA Arad and Csikszereda in?
Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Csikszereda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


