Netherlands - Eerste DivisieData current as of September 12, 2026

Utrecht II vs Almere City: match statistics

Utrecht II crest
Utrecht II
2 : 3half-time 2:1
Almere City crest
Almere City
135%(3.13)
X30%(3.90)
235%(2.05)

The match promises to be a balanced clash between two teams with similar offensive potential. Utrecht II occupies the 14th place in the table, but presents decent form in home matches with 36% victories and an average of 2 goals per match. Almere City, despite a higher position (8th place), has a weak away disposition with 54% losses and merely 8% draws on the road. The recent form of both teams is average – the hosts have not won any of their last 5 matches (4 draws, 1 loss), and the guests have earned only 1 point per match. A key factor is the high average of goals in matches involving both teams (3.86 for the hosts and 3.85 for the guests), suggesting an open game. Given the close xG values, similar ball possession (47% for both), and unstable form, a draw or a slight victory for one of the sides seems most probable.

Utrecht II vs Almere City: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Utrecht II played against Almere City in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on February 27, 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

Utrecht II has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Almere City has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Utrecht II scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.78. Almere City scores 2.04 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 70% of Utrecht II's games and 63% of Almere City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 70%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Almere City has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.66 per game. Utrecht II takes 14.8 shots per game, while Almere City takes 17.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Utrecht II leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.07 goals per game after halftime. Almere City leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.19 after halftime.

When the teams score

Utrecht II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Almere City, it is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Eerste Divisie games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be a balanced clash between two teams with similar offensive potential. Utrecht II occupies the 14th place in the table, but presents decent form in home matches with 36% victories and an average of 2 goals per match. Almere City, despite a higher position (8th place), has a weak away disposition with 54% losses and merely 8% draws on the road. The recent form of both teams is average – the hosts have not won any of their last 5 matches (4 draws, 1 loss), and the guests have earned only 1 point per match. A key factor is the high average of goals in matches involving both teams (3.86 for the hosts and 3.85 for the guests), suggesting an open game. Given the close xG values, similar ball possession (47% for both), and unstable form, a draw or a slight victory for one of the sides seems most probable.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Utrecht IIAlmere City
16Shots19
Utrecht IIAlmere City
8Shots on target9
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.92xG2.25
Utrecht IIAlmere City
3Corners8
Utrecht IIAlmere City
48Dangerous attacks58
Utrecht IIAlmere City
11Fouls10
Utrecht IIAlmere City
0Cards1
Utrecht IIAlmere City

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.67Goals scored / game2.04
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.78Goals allowed / game1.67
Utrecht IIAlmere City
47%Average possession48%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
5.63Shots on target / game6.56
Utrecht IIAlmere City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.78Shots per game17.67
Utrecht IIAlmere City
5.63Shots on target6.56
Utrecht IIAlmere City
11.3%Shot conversion11.5%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
47%Possession48%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.66xG for1.93
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.54xG against1.6
Utrecht IIAlmere City

Shooting quality

Utrecht II: AttackingAlmere City: Attacking
Utrecht IIAlmere City
Accuracy (shots on target)38%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Utrecht II
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W33% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-10
1.22 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Almere City
WLDLL
Season result split
44% W11% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-12
1.44 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-7
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Almere City is 22% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Utrecht II · 2.04 goals / game - Almere City

Almere City is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.78 goals / game - Utrecht II · 1.67 goals / game - Almere City

Utrecht II scoring profile: very strong

Utrecht II scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while Almere City keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 meczów).

Almere City scoring profile: very strong

Almere City scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 meczów).

45Goals scored (season)55
Utrecht IIAlmere City
48Goals conceded (season)45
Utrecht IIAlmere City
3.44Average goals per game3.7
Utrecht IIAlmere City
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Utrecht IIAlmere City
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Utrecht IIAlmere City

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal85%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
52%2 goals59%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
22%3 goals33%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
11%4 goals22%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal78%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
59%2 goals56%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
26%3 goals22%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
7%4 goals7%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time26%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
11%BTTS in both halves7%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
33%Scored in both halves41%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
80%BTTS - last 580%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time96%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Almere City is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / game - Utrecht II · 1.37 pts / game - Almere City

Utrecht II - half-time state
30% leading30% draw41% trailing
Almere City - half-time state
33% leading37% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per game (1st half)1.37
Utrecht IIAlmere City
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.85
Utrecht IIAlmere City
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.48
Utrecht IIAlmere City
52%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
52%No goal before half-time48%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per game (2nd half)1.63
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)1.19
Utrecht IIAlmere City
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.04
Utrecht IIAlmere City
2.07Average goals (2nd half)2.22
Utrecht IIAlmere City
26%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Utrecht IIAlmere City
37%No goal after half-time26%
Utrecht IIAlmere City

Utrecht II - second-half results

33% W37% D30% L
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Almere City - second-half results

44% W30% D26% L
37
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Utrecht II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.20
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Almere City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.62.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Utrecht II
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
3
10
16-30
7
1
31-45
12
6
46-60
9
10
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Almere City
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
6
8
16-30
12
4
31-45
11
7
46-60
5
7
61-75
16
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Utrecht II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Almere City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

Utrecht IILigaAlmere City
Average goals per game 3.443.24 3.70
Both teams scored 70%62% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%65% 70%
Clean sheets 15%21% 22%
Goal before half-time 74%77% 78%
Goal after half-time 89%86% 96%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
1.47
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Almere CityGoalFerdy DruijfAssist: Boyd Reith
  2. Utrecht IIGoalRafik el Arguioui
  3. Utrecht IIGoalEmirhan DemircanAssist: Noa Dundas
  4. Utrecht IISubstitutionOn: Wessel KooyOff: Rafik el Arguioui
  5. Utrecht IISubstitutionOn: Lynden EdhartOff: Massien Ghaddari
  6. Almere CityGoalRuben ProvidenceAssist: Boyd Reith
  7. Almere CityGoalJulian RijkhoffAssist: Ruben Providence
  8. Utrecht IISubstitutionOn: Jessey SneijderOff: Oualid Agougil
  9. Almere CitySubstitutionOn: Job KalisvaartOff: Milan de Haan
  10. Almere CityYellow cardJob Kalisvaart
  11. Almere CitySubstitutionOn: Joey JacobsOff: James Lawrence

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Clay RupertiMatches officiated: 15
3.73Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins27%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Utrecht II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Almere City. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Almere City FC
4 : 0
FC Utrecht II

FAQ

What was the result of Utrecht II vs Almere City?

The Eerste Divisie match finished Utrecht II 2:3 Almere City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht II vs Almere City?

Utrecht II score 1.67 goals per game on average and Almere City 2.04. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Utrecht II's matches and 63% of Almere City's.

What form are Utrecht II and Almere City in?

Over the last 5 games Utrecht II have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Almere City 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht II vs Almere City?

The statistical background for Utrecht II vs Almere City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.