Utrecht II vs Helmond Sport: match statistics
Utrecht II shows solid home form with an even split of 33% wins, draws, and losses at their own stadium, averaging 2 goals per match. The hosts boast better efficiency (12% shot conversion rate) and a higher average xG (1.79) in home matches compared to the visitors' away xG (1.28). Helmond Sport has very poor away statistics with a 71% loss rate, only 14% wins, and a negative goal difference of -19, failing to score in 43% of their games. The recent form of both teams is inconsistent, but Utrecht II has home-field advantage and better offensive metrics in home games. Taking all statistical data into account, the hosts have a realistic chance of winning, although their weak form over the last five matches might introduce some uncertainty into the result.
Utrecht II vs Helmond Sport: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Utrecht II played against Helmond Sport in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on March 13, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Utrecht II has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Helmond Sport has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Utrecht II scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.77. Helmond Sport scores 1.23 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 3.22 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Utrecht II's games and 60% of Helmond Sport's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 63%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Utrecht II has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.36 per game. Utrecht II takes 14.5 shots per game, while Helmond Sport takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Utrecht II leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.97 goals per game after halftime. Helmond Sport leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Utrecht II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Helmond Sport, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.22 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Utrecht II shows solid home form with an even split of 33% wins, draws, and losses at their own stadium, averaging 2 goals per match. The hosts boast better efficiency (12% shot conversion rate) and a higher average xG (1.79) in home matches compared to the visitors' away xG (1.28). Helmond Sport has very poor away statistics with a 71% loss rate, only 14% wins, and a negative goal difference of -19, failing to score in 43% of their games. The recent form of both teams is inconsistent, but Utrecht II has home-field advantage and better offensive metrics in home games. Taking all statistical data into account, the hosts have a realistic chance of winning, although their weak form over the last five matches might introduce some uncertainty into the result.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Utrecht II | Helmond Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Helmond Sport is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Utrecht II · 1.4 pts / game - Helmond Sport
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Utrecht II is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.57 goals / game - Utrecht II · 1.23 goals / game - Helmond Sport
Utrecht II scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Helmond Sport keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 meczów).
Helmond Sport scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Utrecht II
Over / Under - Helmond Sport
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Helmond Sport is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Utrecht II · 1.37 pts / game - Helmond Sport
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Utrecht II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Helmond Sport - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 30%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Utrecht II
Helmond Sport
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| Utrecht II | Liga | Helmond Sport | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.33 | 3.22 | ▼ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 63% | 64% | • 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 21% | ▲ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 87% | 86% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Utrecht II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Helmond Sport. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Utrecht II vs Helmond Sport?
The Eerste Divisie match finished Utrecht II 1:0 Helmond Sport. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht II vs Helmond Sport?
Utrecht II score 1.57 goals per game on average and Helmond Sport 1.23. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Utrecht II's matches and 60% of Helmond Sport's.
What form are Utrecht II and Helmond Sport in?
Over the last 5 games Utrecht II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Helmond Sport 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht II vs Helmond Sport?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Utrecht II vs Helmond Sport: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.