Utrecht II vs Roda JC: match statistics
Utrecht II vs Roda JC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Utrecht II played against Roda JC in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on December 22, 2025. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Utrecht II has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Roda JC has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Utrecht II scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.70. Roda JC scores 1.65 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 3.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Utrecht II's games and 65% of Roda JC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 60%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Roda JC has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.57 per game. Utrecht II takes 13.9 shots per game, while Roda JC takes 14.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Utrecht II leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. Roda JC leads at halftime in 15% and scores 1.10 after halftime.
When the teams score
Utrecht II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Roda JC, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.31 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Utrecht II | Roda JC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Utrecht II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Utrecht II · 1 pts / game - Roda JC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Roda JC is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.7 goals / game - Utrecht II · 1.45 goals / game - Roda JC
Utrecht II scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Roda JC keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
Roda JC scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Utrecht II
Over / Under - Roda JC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Utrecht II is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Utrecht II · 0.85 pts / game - Roda JC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Utrecht II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Roda JC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Utrecht II
Roda JC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| Utrecht II | Liga | Roda JC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.30 | 3.31 | ▼ 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 62% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 65% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 21% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 78% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 86% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Utrecht II's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Roda JC. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Utrecht II vs Roda JC?
The Eerste Divisie match finished Utrecht II 1:3 Roda JC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht II vs Roda JC?
Utrecht II score 1.60 goals per game on average and Roda JC 1.65. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Utrecht II's matches and 65% of Roda JC's.
What form are Utrecht II and Roda JC in?
Over the last 5 games Utrecht II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Roda JC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht II vs Roda JC?
The statistical background for Utrecht II vs Roda JC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.