Netherlands - EredivisieData current as of September 12, 2026

Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam: match statistics

Utrecht crest
Utrecht
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Sparta Rotterdam crest
Sparta Rotterdam
150%(1.77)
X25%(3.82)
225%(4.04)

Utrecht presents solid disposition in home matches, winning 56% of games with just 22% losses and an impressive goal difference of +9. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per match at home, which, combined with an xG index of 1.63, attests to high efficiency. Sparta Rotterdam, despite better form in the last five matches (2.4 PPG), has issues on the road—losing 44% of games and conceding an average of 1.78 goals, with a negative goal difference of -3. A key factor is that Sparta does not draw away matches (0%), which polarizes possible results. Given the hosts' advantage in home games and the visitors' defensive problems on the road, Utrecht has a real chance of victory, although Sparta's good form in recent weeks prevents a call of decisive advantage.

Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Utrecht played against Sparta Rotterdam in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The game was played on January 25, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Utrecht has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Sparta Rotterdam has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Utrecht scores 1.61 goals per game and allows 1.39. Sparta Rotterdam scores 1.26 and allows 1.79. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 72% of Utrecht's games and 37% of Sparta Rotterdam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 53%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Utrecht has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.48 per game. Utrecht takes 14.8 shots per game, while Sparta Rotterdam takes 13.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Utrecht leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Sparta Rotterdam leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.74 after halftime.

When the teams score

Utrecht's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Sparta Rotterdam, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Eredivisie games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Utrecht presents solid disposition in home matches, winning 56% of games with just 22% losses and an impressive goal difference of +9. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per match at home, which, combined with an xG index of 1.63, attests to high efficiency. Sparta Rotterdam, despite better form in the last five matches (2.4 PPG), has issues on the road—losing 44% of games and conceding an average of 1.78 goals, with a negative goal difference of -3. A key factor is that Sparta does not draw away matches (0%), which polarizes possible results. Given the hosts' advantage in home games and the visitors' defensive problems on the road, Utrecht has a real chance of victory, although Sparta's good form in recent weeks prevents a call of decisive advantage.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
22Shots5
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
5Shots on target3
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
2.12xG0.76
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
10Corners0
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
53Dangerous attacks30
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
11Fouls14
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
0Cards4
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1.61Goals scored / game1.26
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1.39Goals allowed / game1.79
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
48%Average possession46%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
5.17Shots on target / game4.68
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.83Shots per game13.37
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
5.17Shots on target4.68
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
10.9%Shot conversion9.4%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
48%Possession46%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1.58xG for1.48
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1.42xG against1.95
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

Shooting quality

Utrecht: AttackingSparta Rotterdam: Balanced
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sparta Rotterdam is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Utrecht · 2.4 pts / game - Sparta Rotterdam

Utrecht
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W28% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-7
1.28 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Sparta Rotterdam
WLWWW
Season result split
47% W11% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-8
1.53 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Utrecht is 28% better for: goals scored per game.

1.61 goals / game - Utrecht · 1.26 goals / game - Sparta Rotterdam

Utrecht is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.39 goals / game - Utrecht · 1.79 goals / game - Sparta Rotterdam

Utrecht scoring profile: very strong

Utrecht scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 meczów), while Sparta Rotterdam keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 meczów).

Sparta Rotterdam scoring profile: very strong

Sparta Rotterdam scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Utrecht keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)24
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
25Goals conceded (season)34
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
3Average goals per game3.05
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
6Goals scored (last 5)8
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal74%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
44%2 goals32%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
17%3 goals16%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
11%4 goals5%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal63%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
39%2 goals42%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
11%3 goals42%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
6%4 goals16%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
6%BTTS in both halves5%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
28%Scored in both halves32%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
100%BTTS - last 520%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sparta Rotterdam is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / game - Utrecht · 1.53 pts / game - Sparta Rotterdam

Utrecht - half-time state
39% leading28% draw33% trailing
Sparta Rotterdam - half-time state
42% leading26% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)1.53
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.53
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.11
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
56%Clean sheet before half-time58%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
50%No goal before half-time47%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per game (2nd half)1.16
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.95
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
39%Clean sheet after half-time42%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam
33%No goal after half-time47%
UtrechtSparta Rotterdam

Utrecht - second-half results

22% W56% D22% L
26
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sparta Rotterdam - second-half results

26% W37% D37% L
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Utrecht - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sparta Rotterdam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Utrecht
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
7
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
6
3
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Sparta Rotterdam
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
3
7
46-60
4
10
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Utrecht

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Sparta Rotterdam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

UtrechtLigaSparta Rotterdam
Average goals per game 3.003.24 3.05
Both teams scored 72%63% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%62% 53%
Clean sheets 17%20% 37%
Goal before half-time 83%84% 84%
Goal after half-time 78%85% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
1.47
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sparta RotterdamGoalShunsuke MitoAssist: Mitchell van Bergen
  2. UtrechtSubstitutionOn: Nick ViergeverOff: Mike Eerdhuijzen
  3. Sparta RotterdamYellow cardBruno Martins Indi
  4. Sparta RotterdamSubstitutionOn: Pelle ClementOff: Julian Baas
  5. UtrechtSubstitutionOn: Gjivai ZechiëlOff: Alonzo Engwanda
  6. Sparta RotterdamYellow cardLushendry Martes
  7. Sparta RotterdamYellow cardMarvin Young
  8. UtrechtSubstitutionOn: Adrian BlakeOff: Jesper Karlsson
  9. UtrechtSubstitutionOn: Oualid AgougilOff: Nick Viergever
  10. UtrechtSubstitutionOn: Niclas VesterlundOff: Siebe Horemans
  11. Sparta RotterdamYellow cardMitchell van Bergen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Erwin BlankMatches officiated: 12
2.83Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins17%Draws42%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Utrecht's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sparta Rotterdam. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Sparta Rotterdam
2 : 1
FC Utrecht

FAQ

What was the result of Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam?

The Eredivisie match finished Utrecht 0:1 Sparta Rotterdam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam?

Utrecht score 1.61 goals per game on average and Sparta Rotterdam 1.26. The Eredivisie average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Utrecht's matches and 37% of Sparta Rotterdam's.

What form are Utrecht and Sparta Rotterdam in?

Over the last 5 games Utrecht have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Sparta Rotterdam 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht vs Sparta Rotterdam?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.