Morocco - Botola ProData current as of November 03, 2026

UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

UTS Rabat plays Amal Tiznit in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game is scheduled for November 6, 2026.

Recent form

UTS Rabat has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Amal Tiznit has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

UTS Rabat scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.67. Amal Tiznit scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of UTS Rabat's games and 67% of Amal Tiznit's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 50%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Amal Tiznit has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 0.93 per game. UTS Rabat takes 5.8 shots per game, while Amal Tiznit takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. Amal Tiznit leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

UTS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Amal Tiznit, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.20 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.67Goals scored / game1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.67Goals allowed / game2
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
44%Average possession49%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
2.33Shots on target / game4.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5.83Shots per game9.33
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
2.33Shots on target4.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
11.4%Shot conversion10.7%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
44%Possession49%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.93xG for1.37
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
1.37xG against1.47
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedAmal Tiznit: Balanced
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
Accuracy (shots on target)40%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

UTS Rabat is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 0.8 pts / game - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat
WDLLD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
WDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Amal Tiznit
WLDLL
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amal Tiznit is 49% better for: goals scored per game.

0.67 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 1 goals / game - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat is 199% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 2 goals / game - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while Amal Tiznit keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).

Amal Tiznit scoring profile: very strong

Amal Tiznit scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

4Goals scored (season)6
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
4Goals conceded (season)12
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
1.33Average goals per game3
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
2Goals scored (last 5)5
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal83%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
17%2 goals17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%3 goals0%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%2 goals50%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%3 goals33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%4 goals17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%BTTS in both halves17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Scored in both halves17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
20%BTTS - last 560%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 166% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 0.5 pts / game - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Amal Tiznit - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)0.5
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.33
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
67%No goal before half-time67%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per game (2nd half)1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
83%No goal after half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

UTS Rabat - second-half results

0% W83% D17% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Amal Tiznit - second-half results

17% W50% D33% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

UTS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.60.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amal Tiznit - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Amal Tiznit
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Amal Tiznit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
204%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaAmal Tiznit
Average goals per game▼ 1.332.20▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%46%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%35%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 33%35%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%61%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%65%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
0.98
Home goals / game
1.22
Away goals / game
+-20%
Home attack advantage
+-24%
Home defensive advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

When do UTS Rabat and Amal Tiznit play?

UTS Rabat face Amal Tiznit on November 6, 2026 in Botola Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit?

UTS Rabat score 0.67 goals per game on average and Amal Tiznit 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 33% of UTS Rabat's matches and 67% of Amal Tiznit's.

What form are UTS Rabat and Amal Tiznit in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Amal Tiznit 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.