UTS Rabat vs FUS Rabat: match statistics
UTS Rabat vs FUS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
UTS Rabat play FUS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. FUS Rabat: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. FUS Rabat scores 1.03 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: UTS Rabat 63%, FUS Rabat 53%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 33%, FUS Rabat 30%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
FUS Rabat has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.30. UTS Rabat: 9.5 shots per match, FUS Rabat: 10.3.
Match halves
UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. FUS Rabat: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). FUS Rabat: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I back an away win (2) based on clear superiority in form and league position: FUS sit 8th while UTS are 14th. FUS have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 points in that run, whereas UTS have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss in their last five, averaging 1.2 points. In attack the teams are comparable — FUS scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per game) versus UTS’s 8 goals (1.6 per game); season totals 20 vs 17, and xG is 1.27 for FUS away compared to 1.20 for UTS at home. Defensively both sides concede 1.67 goals per match on average, however UTS have a higher xG conceded at home (xG against 1.57 vs 1.43 for FUS) and 0% clean sheets at home, while FUS keep clean sheets in 11% of away games. A key contrast is goal-scoring consistency: UTS fail to score in only 11% of home matches, whereas FUS are goalless in 44% of away fixtures, which raises the draw risk; taking into account FUS’s form and stability, I estimate probabilities: 55% away win, 35% draw, 10% home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| UTS Rabat | FUS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
UTS Rabat is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 0.8 pts / match - FUS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FUS Rabat is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 1.2 goals / match - FUS Rabat
UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while FUS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
FUS Rabat scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — UTS Rabat
Over / Under — FUS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FUS Rabat is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1.3 pts / match - FUS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FUS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
UTS Rabat
FUS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| UTS Rabat | Liga | FUS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.40 | 2.17 | • 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 30% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 63% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: UTS Rabat 0 - 1 - 0 FUS Rabat. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of UTS Rabat vs FUS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 0:2 FUS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs FUS Rabat?
UTS Rabat score 1.07 goals per game on average and FUS Rabat 1.03. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 63% of UTS Rabat's matches and 53% of FUS Rabat's.
What form are UTS Rabat and FUS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FUS Rabat 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs FUS Rabat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.