Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 22 July 2026

UTS Rabat vs Kawkab Marrakech: match statistics

UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Kawkab Marrakech crest
Kawkab Marrakech

UTS Rabat vs Kawkab Marrakech: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTS Rabat play Kawkab Marrakech in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 1 June 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kawkab Marrakech: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Kawkab Marrakech scores 0.90 and concedes 0.87. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTS Rabat 63%, Kawkab Marrakech 47%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 33%, Kawkab Marrakech 30%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

UTS Rabat has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.29. UTS Rabat: 9.5 shots per match, Kawkab Marrakech: 10.6.

Match halves

UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. Kawkab Marrakech: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). Kawkab Marrakech: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the away win (Kawkab Marrakech) based on superior away xG — 1.29 vs home xG 1.06 for UTS. Kawkab have conceded 19 goals this season versus UTS’s 33 and average 1.00 conceded away compared to UTS’s 1.64 conceded per home match, indicating a defensive edge for the visitors. The away side are also in better form: 3 wins in the last 5 and 1.8 points per game over the last 5, while the hosts have 2 wins from 5 and 1.2 points per game; additionally Kawkab scored 8 goals in the last 5 versus UTS’s 7. However, the hosts show higher finishing efficiency (12% conversion with an average of 8.09 shots and 3.09 on target at home) versus Kawkab’s 5% conversion on 11.9 shots per game, and UTS record a high 55% draw rate at home, which increases the likelihood of a shared point. Considering the visitors’ better defense and xG and the hosts’ high draw rate, I assess probabilities as: 50% away win, 35% draw, 15% home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
9Shots8
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
4Shots on target6
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.81xG1.65
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
5Corners1
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
130Dangerous attacks98
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
9Fouls20
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
2Cards2
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.07Goals scored / match0.9
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.33Goals conceded / match0.87
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
47%Average possession42%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
4.03Shots on target / match3.3
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match10.57
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
4.03Shots on target3.3
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
11.2%Shot conversion8.5%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
47%Possession42%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.3xG for1.29
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.35xG against1.31
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedKawkab Marrakech: Balanced
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
Accuracy (shots on target)42%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTS Rabat is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1.2 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech

UTS Rabat
LLDWW
Season result split
20% W43% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-13-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kawkab Marrakech
LWDDD
Season result split
27% W40% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-10
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-7
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 0.9 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech

Kawkab Marrakech is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 0.87 goals / match - Kawkab Marrakech

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Kawkab Marrakech scoring profile: very strong

Kawkab Marrakech scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

32Goals scored (season)27
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
40Goals conceded (season)26
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
2.4Average goals in match1.77
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
6Goals scored (last 5)4
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal60%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
27%2 goals23%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
7%3 goals7%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal67%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
30%2 goals20%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
10%3 goals0%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
7%4 goals0%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Kawkab Marrakech - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time7%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
7%BTTS in both halves0%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
13%Scored in both halves13%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
60%BTTS - last 540%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kawkab Marrakech is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1.37 pts / match - Kawkab Marrakech

UTS Rabat - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing
Kawkab Marrakech - half-time state
30% leading47% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.37
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.07Average goals (1st half)0.8
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
57%Clean sheet before half-time70%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
63%No goal before half-time63%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.07
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
1.33Average goals (2nd half)0.97
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
37%Clean sheet after half-time53%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech
50%No goal after half-time63%
UTS RabatKawkab Marrakech

UTS Rabat - second-half results

20% W43% R37% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results

17% W57% R27% P
41
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kawkab Marrakech - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kawkab Marrakech
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
5
1
16-30
9
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Kawkab Marrakech

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaKawkab Marrakech
Average goals in match 2.402.17 1.77
Both teams scored 63%52% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 30%
Clean sheets 13%30% 33%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: UTS Rabat 0 - 0 - 1 Kawkab Marrakech. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Kawkab Marrakech
3 : 0
UTS Rabat

FAQ

What was the result of UTS Rabat vs Kawkab Marrakech?

The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 0:0 Kawkab Marrakech. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Kawkab Marrakech?

UTS Rabat score 1.07 goals per game on average and Kawkab Marrakech 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 63% of UTS Rabat's matches and 47% of Kawkab Marrakech's.

What form are UTS Rabat and Kawkab Marrakech in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kawkab Marrakech 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Kawkab Marrakech?

The statistical background for UTS Rabat vs Kawkab Marrakech — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.