Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 06, 2026

UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès: match statistics

UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Maghreb Fès crest
Maghreb Fès

UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

UTS Rabat played against Maghreb Fès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

UTS Rabat has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Maghreb Fès has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

UTS Rabat scores 1.05 goals per game and allows 1.63. Maghreb Fès scores 1.47 and allows 0.53. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 74% of UTS Rabat's games and 37% of Maghreb Fès's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 26%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

UTS Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.15 per game. UTS Rabat takes 9.4 shots per game, while Maghreb Fès takes 8.7.

First-half and second-half trends

UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. Maghreb Fès leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.89 after halftime.

When the teams score

UTS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Maghreb Fès, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Maghreb Fès is the clear favorite on paper: they sit 2nd (10 wins, 8 draws, 1 loss, goal difference 28-10), while UTS Rabat are 15th (1 win, 10 draws, 8 losses, goals 20-31). In their last five matches Maghreb Fès are 3-1-1 averaging 2.0 points per game, whereas UTS Rabat are 1-1-3 averaging 0.8 points; the hosts conceded 12 goals in those five fixtures while the visitors conceded only 3. The defensive differential is decisive: UTS at home concede 1.7 goals per game with xG against 1.51 and 0% clean sheets, while Maghreb away concede 0.5 goals per game with xG against 1.20 and 50% clean sheets. Offensively both teams are similar — averaging 1.1 goals for the hosts and 1.1 for the visitors, attacking xG 1.13 vs 1.03, shots on target 3.4 vs 3.3 and a conversion rate of 13% — therefore the edge comes from superior defense and ball control (51% possession vs 44%). Considering the table position, better form (2.0 vs 0.8 points per game), markedly superior defensive record (0.5 vs 1.7 goals conceded) and an unbeaten away record (0% losses), I predict a Maghreb Fès victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

UTS Rabat averages 1.89 goals per match this season, while Maghreb Fès records 1.10, giving a clear attacking edge to the home side. The strongest signal for BTTS comes from the last 5 matches: UTS Rabat has 80% BTTS in the last 5 and concedes an average of 2.4 goals, whereas Maghreb Fès has 20% BTTS in the last 5 and concedes 0.6 goals. On a season basis the picture is mixed — season BTTS are 22% for UTS Rabat and 50% for Maghreb Fès, with the league BTTS rate at 50%, providing a moderate basis for both teams to score. Additionally, xG shows the home team creates 1.30 xG versus 1.03 xG for the visitors, average shots on target are 4.11 vs 3.30, and shooting accuracy is 20% vs 13%, which increases the realistic likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the high 80% BTTS rate for the home team in the last 5 matches, the visitors’ season 50% BTTS and the home side’s creative advantage, I tip BTTS - Yes (65%) over No (35%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

After analyzing xG and seasonal metrics, I estimate expected goals of ~1.29 for UTS Rabat and ~1.22 for Maghreb Fès (total 2.51). Seasonally both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: UTS 67% and Maghreb 70% (avg 68.5%), which strengthens the Over 1.5 signal. Over 2.5 looks less convincing due to seasonal rates of 33% (UTS) and 20% (Maghreb), average 26.5%, although UTS’s last 5 matches show 60% of games >2.5, providing moderate short-term support. Additionally the home side has a high shot conversion of 20% with an average of 4.11 shots on target, increasing the likelihood of their goals, but a home clean sheet rate of 67% and low home BTTS of 22% limit the potential for a very high-scoring game. As a result I recommend betting Over 1.5 (strongest signal; est. 69%), while Over 2.5 (36%) and Over 3.5 (12%) appear less profitable.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal metrics favor the home side: UTS Rabat averages 1.89 goals per match versus Maghreb Fès’s 1.10, posts a higher xG (1.30 vs 1.03) and superior shot efficiency (conversion 20% vs 13%), and wins 67% of matches compared to the visitors’ 40%. The hosts led at the break in 5 matches (56% of cases) and score on average 0.67 goals by half-time versus 0.5 for the away team, increasing the likelihood of an HT lead for UTS. In the second half the home team averages 1.22 goals and concedes 0.33, with as many as 7 of their goals occurring in minutes 76–90 versus 1 away goal in that phase, indicating an ability to maintain or extend a lead. Although the visitors are in better recent form over the last 5 matches (60% wins vs the home side’s 20%), the seasonal advantage in xG and shot efficiency supports converting an HT lead into a Full-Time win for the hosts. Therefore I tip 1/1 as the strongest signal with a probability of 42%, with a moderate probability of draws after the break (X/X 13% and X/1 13%) and a low chance of a complete turnaround by the visitors (1/2 6% and 2/2 6%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
2Shots6
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0Shots on target2
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0.42xG0.81
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
3Corners3
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
38Dangerous attacks39
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
20Fouls14
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
4Cards4
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
1.05Goals scored / game1.47
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
1.63Goals allowed / game0.53
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
46%Average possession54%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
3.74Shots on target / game3.68
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.37Shots per game8.68
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
3.74Shots on target3.68
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
11.2%Shot conversion17%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
46%Possession54%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
1.25xG for1.15
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
1.48xG against1.18
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedMaghreb Fès: Efficient finishing
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
Accuracy (shots on target)40%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Maghreb Fès is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 2 pts / game - Maghreb Fès

UTS Rabat
LDWLL
Season result split
5% W53% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-10-8
0.68 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-6-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Maghreb Fès
WWWDL
Season result split
53% W42% R5% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Maghreb Fès is 40% better for: goals scored per game.

1.05 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 1.47 goals / game - Maghreb Fès

Maghreb Fès is 208% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.63 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 0.53 goals / game - Maghreb Fès

UTS Rabat scoring profile: mixed

UTS Rabat scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Maghreb Fès keeps a clean sheet in 58% (11 of 19 meczów).

Maghreb Fès scoring profile: very strong

Maghreb Fès scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 19 meczów).

20Goals scored (season)28
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
31Goals conceded (season)10
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
2.68Average goals per game2
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
9Goals scored (last 5)7
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
12Goals conceded (last 5)3
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal74%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
21%2 goals42%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
11%3 goals16%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0%4 goals16%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal42%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
37%2 goals11%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
16%3 goals0%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
11%4 goals0%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time11%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
11%BTTS in both halves5%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
16%Scored in both halves37%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
80%BTTS - last 520%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Maghreb Fès is 107% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.84 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 1.74 pts / game - Maghreb Fès

UTS Rabat - half-time state
11% leading53% draw37% trailing
Maghreb Fès - half-time state
42% leading47% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.84Points per game (1st half)1.74
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.58
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
1.26Average goals (1st half)0.79
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
42%Clean sheet before half-time79%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
63%No goal before half-time53%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.79
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.21
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
32%Clean sheet after half-time68%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès
47%No goal after half-time37%
UTS RabatMaghreb Fès

UTS Rabat - second-half results

21% W42% R37% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding45%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 5%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Maghreb Fès - second-half results

42% W53% R5% P
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.74
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

UTS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game1.21.2
Average goals per game2.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Maghreb Fès - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
1
11
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Maghreb Fès
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
2
46-60
6
0
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Maghreb Fès

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaMaghreb Fès
Average goals per game 2.682.17 2.00
Both teams scored 74%50% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%38% 26%
Clean sheets 0%31% 58%
Goal before half-time 63%61% 58%
Goal after half-time 84%75% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / game
1.03
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. UTS RabatYellow cardDanilson Gomes Tavares
  2. UTS RabatYellow cardNacer Moustaghfir
  3. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Mohamed FouzairOff: Youness Dahmani
  4. Maghreb FèsGoalHamza Ait AllahAssist: Marouane Ouhrou
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardKoffi Konan
  6. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Yassine ZraaOff: Nacer Moustaghfir
  7. Maghreb FèsYellow cardArthur Kevin Yamga
  8. UTS RabatYellow cardFouad Zahouani
  9. Maghreb FèsYellow cardChehab Salah Al Deen
  10. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Mohammed Amine EssahelOff: Younes Akharraz
  11. Maghreb FèsYellow cardSoufiane Benjdida
  12. Maghreb FèsSubstitutionOn: Youssef DalouziOff: Soulyman Allouch
  13. Maghreb FèsYellow cardKabelo Seakanyeng

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from UTS Rabat's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Maghreb Fès. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Maghreb Fès
1 : 0
UTS Rabat

FAQ

What was the result of UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès?

The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 0:1 Maghreb Fès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès?

UTS Rabat score 1.05 goals per game on average and Maghreb Fès 1.47. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 74% of UTS Rabat's matches and 37% of Maghreb Fès's.

What form are UTS Rabat and Maghreb Fès in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Maghreb Fès 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.