UTS Rabat vs Wydad Casablanca: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
UTS Rabat vs Wydad Casablanca: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
UTS Rabat plays Wydad Casablanca in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game is scheduled for October 24, 2026.
Recent form
UTS Rabat has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. Wydad Casablanca has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.25 points per game.
Scoring records
UTS Rabat scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 0.50. Wydad Casablanca scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of UTS Rabat's games and 50% of Wydad Casablanca's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 25%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wydad Casablanca has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 0.78 per game. UTS Rabat takes 4.8 shots per game, while Wydad Casablanca takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Wydad Casablanca leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
UTS Rabat's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Wydad Casablanca, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| UTS Rabat | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.60 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTS Rabat is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.75 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 1.25 pts / game - Wydad Casablanca
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wydad Casablanca is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 1 goals / game - Wydad Casablanca
UTS Rabat is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - UTS Rabat · 1 goals / game - Wydad Casablanca
UTS Rabat scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 games), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).
Wydad Casablanca scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
Over / Under - Wydad Casablanca
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTS Rabat is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / game - UTS Rabat · 1.25 pts / game - Wydad Casablanca
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Wydad Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 25% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 75% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
UTS Rabat
Wydad Casablanca
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| UTS Rabat | Liga | Wydad Casablanca | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.25 | 2.60 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 47% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 25% | 70% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from UTS Rabat's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Wydad Casablanca. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
When do UTS Rabat and Wydad Casablanca play?
UTS Rabat face Wydad Casablanca on October 24, 2026 in Botola Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTS Rabat and Wydad Casablanca?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTS Rabat won 1, Wydad Casablanca won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Wydad Casablanca?
UTS Rabat score 0.75 goals per game on average and Wydad Casablanca 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 25% of UTS Rabat's matches and 50% of Wydad Casablanca's.
What form are UTS Rabat and Wydad Casablanca in?
Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and Wydad Casablanca 1-2-1 (1.25 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Wydad Casablanca?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.