Uxbridge vs Basingstoke Town: match statistics
Uxbridge vs Basingstoke Town: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Uxbridge played against Basingstoke Town in Southern League Premier South (England). The game was played on September 29, 2026. Venue: Honeycroft. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Uxbridge has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Basingstoke Town has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Uxbridge scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 0.88. Basingstoke Town scores 1.63 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 3.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Uxbridge's games and 75% of Basingstoke Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 50%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Uxbridge has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.38 per game. Uxbridge takes 7.4 shots per game, while Basingstoke Town takes 0.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Uxbridge leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.38 goals per game after halftime. Basingstoke Town leads at halftime in 13% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Uxbridge's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Basingstoke Town, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Southern League Premier South games average 3.07 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Uxbridge have a clearly superior season record: they have won 5 of 8 matches, while Basingstoke Town have recorded 3 wins and suffered 3 defeats. At home, the hosts win 75% of their matches, score an average of 3 goals and concede just 1, whereas the visitors lose 50% of their away games and allow opponents 1.75 goals per match. Uxbridge’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.82, with just 0.73 xG conceded, compared with 1.38 and 1.35 respectively for Basingstoke Town away from home. The hosts also register more shots on target, averaging 6.67 compared with 4, while their shot conversion rate is 16% versus 8% for the visitors. Uxbridge have scored 10 goals in their last five matches, while Basingstoke Town have managed just 4 during the same period, further strengthening the forecast of a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally, both teams have recorded BTTS in 75% of their matches, and neither side has failed to score in any game, which initially supports the Goal/Goal outcome. However, Uxbridge’s current form clearly weakens this signal: BTTS has landed in only 20% of their last 5 matches, with just 0.6 goals conceded per game on average. The hosts have scored 2.0 goals per match during this period and produced an average of 1.56 xG, while Basingstoke have scored only 0.8 goals. The visitors have also improved defensively, conceding an average of 0.8 goals across their last five appearances, making the most likely scenario BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Uxbridge are in good form: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.0 goals scored and just 0.6 conceded, while Basingstoke have managed 0.8 goals per game during the same period. The hosts have a solid basis for scoring, as Basingstoke concede an average of 1.75 goals away from home; however, their recent finishing limits the projection for the visitors to around 0.85 goals. The 3.5 line has not been surpassed in 75% of the teams’ matches to date, and only 25% of their games have ended with at least four goals. In addition, both teams average 1.75 goals after half-time, which supports a 2–3-goal outcome but does not point to a particularly open, high-scoring game. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals has the strongest support, combining Uxbridge’s solid defensive record with Basingstoke’s weaker current attacking output.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Uxbridge have a clearly superior season record overall, averaging 1.75 points per match compared with Basingstoke’s 1.00, while the visitors have lost 50% of their games. The hosts are also in better current form, scoring an average of 2.0 goals and conceding just 0.6 in their last five matches, whereas Basingstoke have managed only 0.8 goals per game. The first half also favors Uxbridge: their opponents have failed to score before the break in any of their last five appearances, conceding an average of 0.8 goals, and have been trailing at half-time in 80% of those matches. After the interval, the hosts still hold the advantage, averaging 1.25 goals, while Basingstoke concede 1.75 goals per match over the course of the season. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT scenario in which Uxbridge lead at the break and maintain their victory through to full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Uxbridge | Basingstoke Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | -49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 1.84 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.74 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Uxbridge is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Uxbridge · 1.6 pts / game - Basingstoke Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Uxbridge is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
2.13 goals / game - Uxbridge · 1.63 goals / game - Basingstoke Town
Uxbridge is 85% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - Uxbridge · 1.63 goals / game - Basingstoke Town
Uxbridge scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Basingstoke Town keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).
Basingstoke Town scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 games), while Uxbridge keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Uxbridge
Over / Under - Basingstoke Town
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Uxbridge is 159% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / game - Uxbridge · 0.63 pts / game - Basingstoke Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Uxbridge - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Basingstoke Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Uxbridge
Basingstoke Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).
Teams vs league
| Uxbridge | Liga | Basingstoke Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.00 | 3.07 | ▲ 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 56% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 25% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 78% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 83% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Basingstoke TownGoalJeremiah Okine-Peters
Head-to-head
Record from Uxbridge's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Basingstoke Town. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Uxbridge vs Basingstoke Town?
The Southern League Premier South match finished Uxbridge 2:1 Basingstoke Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Uxbridge and Basingstoke Town?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Uxbridge won 2, Basingstoke Town won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Uxbridge vs Basingstoke Town?
Uxbridge score 2.13 goals per game on average and Basingstoke Town 1.63. The Southern League Premier South average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Uxbridge's matches and 75% of Basingstoke Town's.
What form are Uxbridge and Basingstoke Town in?
Over the last 5 games Uxbridge have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Basingstoke Town 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Uxbridge vs Basingstoke Town?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Uxbridge vs Basingstoke Town: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


