Vaduz vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Vaduz vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Vaduz played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Rheinpark Stadion. Final score: 5:2.
Recent form
Vaduz has 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Grasshopper has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 0.33 points per game.
Scoring records
Vaduz scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 3.00. Grasshopper scores 1.00 and allows 2.33. Games in this league average 3.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Vaduz's games and 100% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 76% for BTTS and 80% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vaduz has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.32 per game. Vaduz takes 13.5 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Vaduz leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Vaduz's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.80 goals. Both teams score in 76% of games, and 80% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vaduz remain winless after 4 league matches and have collected just 1 point from their last five games, losing 4 times. The hosts average 2 goals scored at home, but their defense is highly error-prone: they concede 3 goals per match and allow opponents an xG of 2.66. Grasshopper have a clearly superior current run, having earned 7 points and scored 10 goals in their last five matches, compared with Vaduz’s 9 goals scored and as many as 14 conceded. The visitors are also considerably more solid defensively, conceding an average of 1.5 goals away from home and allowing opponents an xG of 1.54. Both teams regularly find the net, but greater defensive stability and better recent results point to a Grasshopper victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is very strong, as Vaduz and Grasshopper have recorded BTTS - Yes in 100% of their league matches so far, while their figures over the last five games stand at 100% and 80%, respectively. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and neither has ended a match without scoring. In their last five appearances, Vaduz averaged 1.8 goals scored and 2.8 conceded, while Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. The high xG figures from the last five matches—1.60 for Vaduz and 1.61 for Grasshopper—support the genuine quality of the chances created by both sides. An additional argument is the league-wide BTTS average of 71%, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score—BTTS - No—look considerably less likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal threshold in every match played so far this season, while Vaduz have shown an exceptionally weak defense, conceding an average of 4.0 goals per game. In their last five matches, Vaduz scored 1.8 goals and conceded 2.8, whereas Grasshopper scored 2.0 and allowed their opponents 1.6 goals. Their attacking potential is also confirmed by xG: 1.60 for the home side and 1.61 for the visitors, combined with high xG conceded by both defenses, at 2.12 and 1.81 respectively. In addition, both teams have scored in every match this season, while the league average stands at as many as 3.76 goals per game. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as even with a more conservative chance-conversion rate, the data clearly points to at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Grasshopper are showing better current form: over their last five matches, they averaged 1.4 points and won 40% of their games, while Vaduz failed to win any, lost 80% of their matches, and averaged just 0.2 points per game. The visitors have been more stable before the break, as they led at half-time in 40% of matches in this run and conceded an average of 0.6 goals, compared with 1.2 goals conceded by the hosts. The strongest argument for the visitors maintaining their advantage lies in the second half: Vaduz conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period and failed to win any of their last five second halves, whereas Grasshopper won the second half in 60% of cases. Vaduz’s seasonal home data are also alarming, as the team conceded an average of 4.0 goals per match and lost every game, compared with Grasshopper’s average of 1.5 goals conceded away from home. The scenario in which Grasshopper lead at the break and go on to win is therefore the most likely, although the high number of goals scored by both sides also increases the risk of Half-Time/Full-Time outcomes involving a draw at half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Vaduz | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vaduz is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Vaduz · 1 goals / game - Grasshopper
Grasshopper is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
3 goals / game - Vaduz · 2.33 goals / game - Grasshopper
Vaduz scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
Grasshopper scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Vaduz keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vaduz
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grasshopper is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Vaduz · 1.33 pts / game - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vaduz - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Vaduz
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Vaduz | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.75 | 3.80 | ▼ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 12% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 92% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Vaduz vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Vaduz 5:2 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vaduz vs Grasshopper?
Vaduz score 1.75 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.00. The Super League average is 3.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Vaduz's matches and 100% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Vaduz and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Vaduz have a 0-0-4 record (0.00 points per game) and Grasshopper 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vaduz vs Grasshopper?
The statistical background for Vaduz vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


