Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildOrigovöllurinnData current as of October 15, 2026

Valur vs FH: match statistics

Valur crest
Valur
3 : 5half-time 0:3
FH crest
FH

Valur vs FH: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Valur played against FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Origovöllurinn. Final score: 3:5.

Recent form

Valur has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. FH has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Valur scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.96. FH scores 1.46 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 3.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Valur's games and 63% of FH's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 54%, compared with league averages of 72% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Valur has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 1.70 per game. Valur takes 15.8 shots per game, while FH takes 14.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Valur leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. FH leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.58 after halftime.

When the teams score

Valur's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For FH, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 3.88 goals. Both teams score in 72% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Valur have the home advantage: they average 2.17 goals per match at home, while FH score 1.09 goals away. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 2.05 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.42, and register 6.42 shots on target to FH’s 4.18. However, their defense remains a weak point: Valur concede an average of 2.33 goals at home and have kept a clean sheet in just 8% of those matches. FH have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 11 goals in the process, so they could exploit these defensive issues despite losing 45% of their away games. Valur’s superior chance creation and FH’s struggles on the road point to a home win, although the risk of conceding is high.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS landed in 69% of Valur’s matches and 55% of FH’s, with those figures rising to 80% and 60%, respectively, over the last five rounds. Valur average 1.77 goals scored, while FH concede 2.00, making a goal for the home side look likely. The visitors score only 1.09 goals per match and have failed to score in 36% of their games, but Valur concede an average of 1.46 goals, with opponents recording an xG of 1.92. FH’s improved attack also supports the prospect of an away goal: in their last five matches, the visitors averaged 2.2 goals and generated an xG of 1.83. The risk that either team fails to score remains significant, but the overall figures, together with the league BTTS rate of 72%, point towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Valur score an average of 1.77 goals per match, while FH concede 2.00; average xG figures are 1.93 for the home side’s attack and 2.16 for the visitors’ defense, which points to Valur getting on the scoresheet. FH average 1.09 goals scored, but Valur concede 1.46, so the visitors also have a chance to add a goal. Valur’s last five matches have averaged 3.2 goals, and FH’s matches have also averaged 3.2; both teams went over 2.5 goals in 60% of those games. The strongest signal, however, is for Over 1.5 goals: it landed in 85% of Valur’s matches and 73% of FH’s matches this season. With a projected total of 3.35 goals, this offers greater confidence than backing Over 2.5 or Over 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest indication that Valur will lead at the break is its average of 1.15 first-half goals scored, compared with the 1.18 goals FH concede during that period. Valur led at half-time in 46% of its matches, while FH were trailing at the break in 45%, supporting the 1/1 scenario. Across the full match, the hosts average 1.77 goals compared with 1.09 for the visitors, who concede an average of 2.00; Valur’s attacking advantage is also reflected in the xG figures of 1.93 versus 1.42 for FH. However, this is not a certain pick: FH have won 3 of their last 5 matches and led at half-time in 3 of them, so outcomes involving the visitors taking the lead also warrant a meaningful share. Despite FH’s improved form, Valur’s season-long advantage both before half-time and in goals scored makes a home lead at the break followed by a full-time win the most likely individual scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 3
First half
3 : 2
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
ValurFH
21Shots24
ValurFH
8Shots on target13
ValurFH
2.42xG2.83
ValurFH
13Corners8
ValurFH
75Dangerous attacks58
ValurFH
5Fouls10
ValurFH
1Cards1
ValurFH

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.83Goals scored / game1.46
ValurFH
1.96Goals allowed / game1.71
ValurFH
50%Average possession45%
ValurFH
5.83Shots on target / game5.04
ValurFH

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.75Shots per game13.96
ValurFH
5.83Shots on target5.04
ValurFH
11.6%Shot conversion10.4%
ValurFH
50%Possession45%
ValurFH
1.81xG for1.7
ValurFH
2.19xG against2.03
ValurFH

Shooting quality

Valur: AttackingFH: Balanced
ValurFH
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FH is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Valur · 2 pts / game - FH

Valur
LDWWD
Season result split
38% W17% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-11
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
FH
DWLWW
Season result split
25% W38% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-9
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Valur is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.83 goals / game - Valur · 1.46 goals / game - FH

FH is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.96 goals / game - Valur · 1.71 goals / game - FH

Valur scoring profile: very strong

Valur scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 games), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 games).

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 games).

44Goals scored (season)35
ValurFH
47Goals conceded (season)41
ValurFH
3.79Average goals per game3.17
ValurFH
9Goals scored (last 5)11
ValurFH
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
ValurFH

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal75%
ValurFH
54%2 goals46%
ValurFH
29%3 goals17%
ValurFH
17%4 goals4%
ValurFH

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal79%
ValurFH
58%2 goals42%
ValurFH
29%3 goals29%
ValurFH
13%4 goals17%
ValurFH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time25%
ValurFH
8%BTTS in both halves8%
ValurFH
42%Scored in both halves21%
ValurFH

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
ValurFH
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
ValurFH
80%BTTS - last 560%
ValurFH

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
ValurFH
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
ValurFH
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
ValurFH

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
ValurFH
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
ValurFH
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
ValurFH

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FH is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / game - Valur · 1.38 pts / game - FH

Valur - half-time state
29% leading42% draw29% trailing
FH - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per game (1st half)1.38
ValurFH
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.88
ValurFH
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
ValurFH
1.79Average goals (1st half)1.71
ValurFH
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
ValurFH
38%No goal before half-time46%
ValurFH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per game (2nd half)1.08
ValurFH
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
ValurFH
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
ValurFH
2Average goals (2nd half)1.46
ValurFH
29%Clean sheet after half-time46%
ValurFH
38%No goal after half-time58%
ValurFH

Valur - second-half results

29% W33% D38% L
31
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FH - second-half results

29% W21% D50% L
33
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Valur - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
FH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.20
Goals scored / game1.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Valur
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
9
8
16-30
5
8
31-45
6
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
15
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

FH
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
5
16-30
10
9
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
6
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.48
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Valur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ValurLigaFH
Average goals per game• 3.793.88▼ 3.17
Both teams scored▲ 75%72%▼ 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 71%70%▼ 54%
Clean sheets▼ 8%16%▲ 21%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%81%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time• 88%87%▼ 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.88
Average goals per game
72%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.15
Home goals / game
1.72
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Valur's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against FH. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

FH
2 : 0
Valur
Valur
3 : 0
FH
Valur Reykjavík
4 : 4
FH Hafnarfjördur
Valur Reykjavík
3 : 1
FH Hafnarfjördur
FH Hafnarfjördur
3 : 0
Valur Reykjavík

FAQ

What was the result of Valur vs FH?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Valur 3:5 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Valur and FH?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Valur won 2, FH won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Valur vs FH?

Valur score 1.83 goals per game on average and FH 1.46. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Valur's matches and 63% of FH's.

What form are Valur and FH in?

Over the last 5 games Valur have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FH 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Valur vs FH?

The statistical background for Valur vs FH — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.