Van vs BKMA: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Van played against BKMA in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on November 23, 2025. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

Van has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. BKMA has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Van scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.46. BKMA scores 1.25 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Van's games and 67% of BKMA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 67%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Van has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.18 per game. Van takes 12.3 shots per game, while BKMA takes 10.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Van leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. BKMA leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Van's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For BKMA, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Armenian Premier League games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
VanBKMA
12Shots12
VanBKMA
7Shots on target6
VanBKMA
1.7xG1.59
VanBKMA
6Corners6
VanBKMA
63Dangerous attacks58
VanBKMA
9Fouls14
VanBKMA
0Cards4
VanBKMA

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.08Goals scored / game1.25
VanBKMA
1.46Goals allowed / game1.42
VanBKMA
49%Average possession49%
VanBKMA
3.31Shots on target / game3.25
VanBKMA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.31Shots per game10.25
VanBKMA
3.31Shots on target3.25
VanBKMA
8.8%Shot conversion12.2%
VanBKMA
49%Possession49%
VanBKMA
1.29xG for1.18
VanBKMA
1.32xG against1.74
VanBKMA

Shooting quality

Van: BalancedBKMA: Balanced
VanBKMA
Accuracy (shots on target)27%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Van is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Van · 0.8 pts / game - BKMA

Van
LWLWW
Season result split
38% W15% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-6
1.31 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
BKMA
DWLLL
Season result split
17% W42% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-5
0.92 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
LDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BKMA is 16% better for: goals scored per game.

1.08 goals / game - Van · 1.25 goals / game - BKMA

Van scoring profile: strong

Van scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while BKMA keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).

BKMA scoring profile: very strong

BKMA scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Van keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)15
VanBKMA
19Goals conceded (season)17
VanBKMA
2.54Average goals per game2.67
VanBKMA
8Goals scored (last 5)8
VanBKMA
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
VanBKMA

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal75%
VanBKMA
31%2 goals33%
VanBKMA
15%3 goals8%
VanBKMA
0%4 goals8%
VanBKMA

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal75%
VanBKMA
46%2 goals58%
VanBKMA
8%3 goals8%
VanBKMA
8%4 goals0%
VanBKMA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time0%
VanBKMA
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VanBKMA
15%Scored in both halves17%
VanBKMA

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
VanBKMA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
VanBKMA
80%BTTS - last 560%
VanBKMA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
VanBKMA
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
VanBKMA
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VanBKMA

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
VanBKMA
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
VanBKMA
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
VanBKMA

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BKMA is 131% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / game - Van · 1.25 pts / game - BKMA

Van - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
BKMA - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per game (1st half)1.25
VanBKMA
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.42
VanBKMA
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
VanBKMA
1.15Average goals (1st half)1
VanBKMA
31%Clean sheet before half-time58%
VanBKMA
77%No goal before half-time67%
VanBKMA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.42
VanBKMA
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
VanBKMA
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
VanBKMA
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.67
VanBKMA
54%Clean sheet after half-time42%
VanBKMA
46%No goal after half-time42%
VanBKMA

Van - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding475%

Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

BKMA - second-half results

33% W42% R25% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Van - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-5+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
BKMA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.80
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Van
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
5
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

BKMA
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
3
46-60
5
5
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Van

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

BKMA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VanLigaBKMA
Average goals per game 2.542.55 2.67
Both teams scored 54%50% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%50% 67%
Clean sheets 23%30% 25%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 69%82% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+50%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VanSubstitutionOn: Danila BokovOff: Gor Manukyan
  2. BKMAYellow cardMichel Ayvazyan
  3. BKMAYellow cardPetik Manukyan
  4. BKMAYellow cardMark Avetisyan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Artem GasparyanMatches officiated: 15
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 253%Home wins13%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Van's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against BKMA. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Banaki Kentronakan Marzakan Akumb
0 : 0
FK Van

FAQ

What was the result of Van vs BKMA?

The Armenian Premier League match finished Van 3:2 BKMA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Van vs BKMA?

Van score 1.08 goals per game on average and BKMA 1.25. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Van's matches and 67% of BKMA's.

What form are Van and BKMA in?

Over the last 5 games Van have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and BKMA 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Van vs BKMA?

The statistical background for Van vs BKMA — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.