Varzim vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Varzim played against CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on December 20, 2025. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Varzim has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. CD Trofense has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Varzim scores 1.46 goals per game and allows 1.00. CD Trofense scores 1.31 and allows 0.77. Games in this league average 2.04 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Varzim's games and 62% of CD Trofense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 38%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Varzim has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.29 per game. Varzim takes 10.2 shots per game, while CD Trofense takes 8.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Varzim leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. CD Trofense leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Varzim's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For CD Trofense, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 3 games average 2.04 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
VarzimCD Trofense
8Shots3
VarzimCD Trofense
1Shots on target2
VarzimCD Trofense
1.02xG0.51
VarzimCD Trofense
10Corners0
VarzimCD Trofense
61Dangerous attacks23
VarzimCD Trofense
18Fouls19
VarzimCD Trofense
5Cards4
VarzimCD Trofense

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

VarzimCD Trofense
1.46Goals scored / game1.31
VarzimCD Trofense
1Goals allowed / game0.77
VarzimCD Trofense
49%Average possession51%
VarzimCD Trofense
3.85Shots on target / game3.38
VarzimCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.15Shots per game8.77
VarzimCD Trofense
3.85Shots on target3.38
VarzimCD Trofense
14.4%Shot conversion14.9%
VarzimCD Trofense
49%Possession51%
VarzimCD Trofense
1.33xG for1.29
VarzimCD Trofense
1.2xG against1.17
VarzimCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Varzim: Efficient finishingCD Trofense: Efficient finishing
VarzimCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Varzim is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Varzim · 1.2 pts / game - CD Trofense

Varzim
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
31% W54% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-2
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Trofense
LDDDW
Season result split
38% W46% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-2
1.62 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Varzim is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.46 goals / game - Varzim · 1.31 goals / game - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Varzim · 0.77 goals / game - CD Trofense

Varzim scoring profile: very strong

Varzim scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).

CD Trofense scoring profile: strong

CD Trofense scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)17
VarzimCD Trofense
13Goals conceded (season)10
VarzimCD Trofense
2.46Average goals per game2.08
VarzimCD Trofense
6Goals scored (last 5)4
VarzimCD Trofense
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
VarzimCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal69%
VarzimCD Trofense
38%2 goals38%
VarzimCD Trofense
23%3 goals8%
VarzimCD Trofense
8%4 goals8%
VarzimCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal69%
VarzimCD Trofense
23%2 goals8%
VarzimCD Trofense
8%3 goals0%
VarzimCD Trofense
0%4 goals0%
VarzimCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time23%
VarzimCD Trofense
8%BTTS in both halves0%
VarzimCD Trofense
23%Scored in both halves23%
VarzimCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
VarzimCD Trofense
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VarzimCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 560%
VarzimCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
VarzimCD Trofense
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
VarzimCD Trofense
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
VarzimCD Trofense

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
VarzimCD Trofense
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
VarzimCD Trofense
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
VarzimCD Trofense

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / game - Varzim · 1.38 pts / game - CD Trofense

Varzim - half-time state
23% leading54% draw23% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
31% leading46% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per game (1st half)1.38
VarzimCD Trofense
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.69
VarzimCD Trofense
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
VarzimCD Trofense
1Average goals (1st half)1.15
VarzimCD Trofense
62%Clean sheet before half-time54%
VarzimCD Trofense
62%No goal before half-time54%
VarzimCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per game (2nd half)1.46
VarzimCD Trofense
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
VarzimCD Trofense
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.31
VarzimCD Trofense
1.46Average goals (2nd half)0.92
VarzimCD Trofense
46%Clean sheet after half-time69%
VarzimCD Trofense
38%No goal after half-time54%
VarzimCD Trofense

Varzim - second-half results

38% W38% D23% L
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CD Trofense - second-half results

31% W54% D15% L
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Varzim - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Trofense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

VarzimLigaCD Trofense
Average goals per game 2.462.04 2.08
Both teams scored 62%44% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%31% 38%
Clean sheets 31%35% 31%
Goal before half-time 62%57% 69%
Goal after half-time 85%72% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.04
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / game
0.87
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CD TrofenseYellow cardNuno Filipe Ribeiro Teixeira
  2. VarzimYellow cardEric Ayiah
  3. CD TrofenseYellow cardIvandro Varela Soares
  4. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Miguel Bruno Sousa PereiraOff: Ivandro Varela Soares
  5. VarzimYellow cardMiguel Monte Vila Cova
  6. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Ibn Ousmane DiagneOff: Rafael Henrique Assis Cardoso
  7. CD TrofenseYellow cardMiguel Bruno Sousa Pereira
  8. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Welisson Costa SantosOff: Eduardo Ferreira Duarte
  9. CD TrofenseYellow cardJoel António Soares Ferreira

Head-to-head

Record from Varzim's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against CD Trofense. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

CD Trofense
2 : 1
Varzim SC

FAQ

What was the result of Varzim vs CD Trofense?

The Liga 3 match finished Varzim 0:1 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Varzim vs CD Trofense?

Varzim score 1.46 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 1.31. The Liga 3 average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Varzim's matches and 62% of CD Trofense's.

What form are Varzim and CD Trofense in?

Over the last 5 games Varzim have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and CD Trofense 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Varzim vs CD Trofense?

The statistical background for Varzim vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.