Ventforet Kofu vs Kataller Toyama: match statistics
Ventforet Kofu vs Kataller Toyama: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ventforet Kofu played against Kataller Toyama in J2 League (Japan). The game was played on October 3, 2026. Venue: Yamanashi Chuo Bank Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Ventforet Kofu has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Kataller Toyama has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ventforet Kofu scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.88. Kataller Toyama scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Ventforet Kofu's games and 25% of Kataller Toyama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kataller Toyama has the higher season xG average, 2.41 to 1.35 per game. Ventforet Kofu takes 10.8 shots per game, while Kataller Toyama takes 21.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Ventforet Kofu leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Kataller Toyama leads at halftime in 38% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ventforet Kofu's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Kataller Toyama, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J2 League games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kataller Toyama sit 5th and are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, while 18th-placed Ventforet Kofu have lost 4 of their last 5. The visitors scored 8 goals and conceded 4 over that period, while the hosts netted 4 and conceded as many as 11. Kataller’s edge in chance creation is reflected in the away statistics: their average xG is 2.20, compared with Kofu’s 1.19 at home, while shots on target stand at 6.25 and 3.25 per match, respectively. Toyama have won 75% of their away matches and conceded an average of just 0.50 goals in them, whereas Kofu have won 25% of their home fixtures and failed to score in half of them. These differences point towards an away win, although home advantage gives the hosts some chance of picking up points.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest evidence against both teams scoring comes from Kataller Toyama’s defense: the visitors kept a clean sheet in 75% of the matches in the sample, conceded an average of 0.5 goals, and BTTS landed in 0% of those games. Ventforet Kofu have scored just 0.8 goals per match recently and lost 4 of their last 5, increasing the risk that the hosts fail to score. On the other hand, Kataller scored 1.6 goals per match over this period, while Kofu conceded 2.2, so an away goal looks likely. However, BTTS - No is not a clear favorite: this bet wins if at least one team fails to score, and does not necessarily require a 0-0 draw. Both teams also have high average xG — 2.62 for Kofu and 2.20 for Kataller — while BTTS landed in 60% and 40% of their respective last 5 matches.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Ventforet Kofu have averaged 0.8 goals scored and 2.2 conceded across their last five matches, while Kataller Toyama have averaged 1.6 scored and 0.8 conceded. Recent results therefore point to the visitors making a greater contribution to the goal tally, with their average xG over this period standing at 2.00 compared with 1.22 for the hosts. At least two goals have been scored in 75% of the matches played by the two teams so far, supporting the Over 1.5 goals pick. The 2.5 line is less convincing: it was surpassed in 60% of Kofu’s last five matches, but in only 40% of Toyama’s. With a projected total of 2.85 goals, Over 1.5 goals offers the strongest signal, although the visitors’ solid defense reduces confidence in picks on higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is likely, as Kataller Toyama went into the break level in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Ventforet Kofu failed to score before the break in 4 of 5. After the break, the form advantage favors the visitors: they won the second half in 60% of their last 5 matches and conceded no goals in those halves, while the hosts lost all 5 second halves, conceding an average of 1.6 goals. Kataller remained unbeaten across those 5 matches, averaging 2.2 points, while Kofu lost 4 of 5 and averaged 0.6 points. The visitors leading at the break is also a realistic scenario, as they have done so in 50% of their matches this season. However, their recent tendency to draw at half-time, combined with their clear advantage after the interval, makes a half-time draw and a Kataller win at full-time the strongest pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ventforet Kofu | Kataller Toyama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kataller Toyama is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Ventforet Kofu · 1.6 pts / game - Kataller Toyama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kataller Toyama is 167% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Ventforet Kofu · 2 goals / game - Kataller Toyama
Kataller Toyama is 88% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.88 goals / game - Ventforet Kofu · 1 goals / game - Kataller Toyama
Ventforet Kofu scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 games), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 games).
Kataller Toyama scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Ventforet Kofu keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ventforet Kofu
Over / Under - Kataller Toyama
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kataller Toyama is 84% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / game - Ventforet Kofu · 1.38 pts / game - Kataller Toyama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ventforet Kofu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kataller Toyama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ventforet Kofu
Kataller Toyama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Ventforet Kofu | Liga | Kataller Toyama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.63 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 29% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ventforet Kofu's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Kataller Toyama. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ventforet Kofu vs Kataller Toyama?
The J2 League match finished Ventforet Kofu 1:2 Kataller Toyama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ventforet Kofu and Kataller Toyama?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ventforet Kofu won 0, Kataller Toyama won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ventforet Kofu vs Kataller Toyama?
Ventforet Kofu score 0.75 goals per game on average and Kataller Toyama 2.00. The J2 League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Ventforet Kofu's matches and 25% of Kataller Toyama's.
What form are Ventforet Kofu and Kataller Toyama in?
Over the last 5 games Ventforet Kofu have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kataller Toyama 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ventforet Kofu vs Kataller Toyama?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.