Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy: match statistics

Veres crest
Veres
0 : 3half-time 0:1
LNZ Cherkasy crest
LNZ Cherkasy
120%(4.35)
X25%(3.25)
255%(1.72)

LNZ Cherkasy presents decidedly higher form and quality, occupying 2nd place in the table with an impressive record of 12 victories this season. The visitors have won as many as 75% of away matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of cases, which proves their excellent defense (averaging 0.63 goals conceded per match). Veres finds itself only in 9th position, with a negative goal difference at home (-2) and poor form (only 1 victory in the last 5 matches). The xG statistics also favor LNZ (1.52 vs 1.04), and the guests have significantly higher efficiency (12% vs 9%) and more shots on target (4.38 vs 2.56). With such a large difference in class and form, LNZ Cherkasy should confidently win this encounter.

Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Veres play LNZ Cherkasy in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match date is 9 March 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Veres: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. LNZ Cherkasy: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Veres scores 0.87 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. LNZ Cherkasy scores 1.30 and concedes 0.57. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Veres 30%, LNZ Cherkasy 20%. Over 2.5: Veres 33%, LNZ Cherkasy 27%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

LNZ Cherkasy has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.06. Veres: 9.2 shots per match, LNZ Cherkasy: 13.0.

Match halves

Veres: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.60. LNZ Cherkasy: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Veres: 46-60 (8 goals). LNZ Cherkasy: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

LNZ Cherkasy presents decidedly higher form and quality, occupying 2nd place in the table with an impressive record of 12 victories this season. The visitors have won as many as 75% of away matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of cases, which proves their excellent defense (averaging 0.63 goals conceded per match). Veres finds itself only in 9th position, with a negative goal difference at home (-2) and poor form (only 1 victory in the last 5 matches). The xG statistics also favor LNZ (1.52 vs 1.04), and the guests have significantly higher efficiency (12% vs 9%) and more shots on target (4.38 vs 2.56). With such a large difference in class and form, LNZ Cherkasy should confidently win this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
5Shots12
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1Shots on target3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.64xG1.29
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
6Corners7
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
34Dangerous attacks45
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
7Fouls18
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1Cards3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.87Goals scored / match1.3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.33Goals conceded / match0.57
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
41%Average possession45%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
3Shots on target / match4.27
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.17Shots per match12.97
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
3Shots on target4.27
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
9.5%Shot conversion10%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
41%Possession45%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.06xG for1.5
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.5xG against0.99
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Shooting quality

Veres: BalancedLNZ Cherkasy: Balanced
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

LNZ Cherkasy is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Veres · 1.6 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy

Veres
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W33% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-13
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
LNZ Cherkasy
DDWLW
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-6-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
10-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 0.73BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LNZ Cherkasy is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.87 goals / match - Veres · 1.3 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy is 133% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Veres · 0.57 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy

Veres scoring profile: more difficult

Veres scores in 47% of matches (14 of 30 matches), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 67% (20 of 30 matches).

LNZ Cherkasy scoring profile: strong

LNZ Cherkasy scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

26Goals scored (season)39
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
40Goals conceded (season)17
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
2.2Average goals in match1.87
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
4Goals scored (last 5)3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
9Goals conceded (last 5)1
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal73%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
27%2 goals40%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
13%3 goals13%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0%4 goals3%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal33%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
40%2 goals13%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
20%3 goals7%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
7%4 goals3%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time7%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
17%Scored in both halves30%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
40%BTTS - last 50%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LNZ Cherkasy is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - Veres · 1.7 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy

Veres - half-time state
13% leading47% draw40% trailing
LNZ Cherkasy - half-time state
43% leading40% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.7
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.53
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.83
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
53%Clean sheet before half-time77%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
77%No goal before half-time50%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.83
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.03
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
53%Clean sheet after half-time80%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
60%No goal after half-time47%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Veres - second-half results

27% W40% R33% P
26
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results

47% W43% R10% P
51
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Veres - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
LNZ Cherkasy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Veres
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
1
5
16-30
3
8
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

LNZ Cherkasy
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
1
16-30
10
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
9
2
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

LNZ Cherkasy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VeresLigaLNZ Cherkasy
Average goals in match 2.202.57 1.87
Both teams scored 30%43% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%47% 27%
Clean sheets 33%33% 67%
Goal before half-time 60%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%76% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Veres 1 - 0 - 0 LNZ Cherkasy. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

LNZ Cherkasy FC
0 : 2
FC Veres Rivne

FAQ

What was the result of Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished Veres 0:3 LNZ Cherkasy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy?

Veres score 0.87 goals per game on average and LNZ Cherkasy 1.30. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Veres's matches and 20% of LNZ Cherkasy's.

What form are Veres and LNZ Cherkasy in?

Over the last 5 games Veres have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and LNZ Cherkasy 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.