Poland - 3 Liga Group 2Data current as of October 22, 2026

Victoria Września vs Noteć Czarnków: match statistics

Victoria Września vs Noteć Czarnków: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Victoria Września played against Noteć Czarnków in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Victoria Września has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Noteć Czarnków has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Victoria Września scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.48. Noteć Czarnków scores 1.43 and allows 1.48. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of Victoria Września's games and 43% of Noteć Czarnków's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 48%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Noteć Czarnków has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.18 per game. Victoria Września takes 2.6 shots per game, while Noteć Czarnków takes 9.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Victoria Września leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Noteć Czarnków leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.74 after halftime.

When the teams score

Victoria Września's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Noteć Czarnków, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 2 games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Noteć Czarnków has a clear advantage in key metrics: away they record a 45% win rate and average 1.64 goals scored with xG 1.62, while Victoria at home wins only 27% of matches and has average xG 0.87. The difference in chance creation is significant — Noteć averages 13.22 shots per game (5.11 on target) away, whereas Victoria at home manages only 4 shots (2 on target), which translates into more opportunities for the visitors. The home defense looks weaker: Victoria concedes on average 1.82 goals at home with average xG against 2.47, while Noteć concedes 1.73 goals away and has xG against 1.4. In the last 5 matches Noteć recorded 2 wins, scored 4 goals and averaged 1.2 points, while Victoria has 1 win, 5 goals scored and 0.8 points on average, further favoring the visitors. Considering higher finishing effectiveness (33 goals this season vs 26), better chance creation and a higher away win rate, I expect a Noteć victory; suggested probabilities are 20% for the home side, 25% for a draw and 55% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics indicate a clear Lean towards BTTS - Yes — the home side generates 2.37 xG per match and records 7.67 shots on target from 17.5 total shots, while Noteć concedes 1.4 xG and allows 1.73 goals per game. The visitors average 1.64 goals per match and have a high conversion rate of 13%, and Victoria have only 17% clean sheets this season, increasing the likelihood that Noteć will score. Despite seasonal BTTS rates of 42% (Victoria) and 45% (Noteć), both below the league average of 51%, Victoria have produced BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, and Noteć have conceded an average of 2.0 goals per game in that period. The gap between the home xG (2.37) and their actual goals per game (1.25) suggests the hosts create many chances that should yield goals, and Noteć’s high conversion (13%) raises the chance of a goal from the away side. Therefore I project BTTS - Yes at 62% vs 38% for No as the strongest signal from the data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis points to a goals-friendly game: home xG is 2.37 while Noteć’s defense xG conceded is 1.40, yielding Victoria’s expected goals ≈1.89; Noteć’s xG is 1.62 versus Victoria’s defense 1.01 yielding ≈1.32 expected, total ≈3.21 goals. The league average is 2.96 goals per game this season, Victoria has Over1.5 in 75% of matches and Noteć in 73%, with Victoria scoring at least 1 goal in 100% of games and Noteć in 82% — a strong case for Over1.5 (I price it at 84%). Shot metrics show the hosts average 17.5 shots and 7.67 on target per match with a low finishing rate of 6%, which explains the xG 2.37 versus season goals scored 1.25 and suggests potential for goal outcomes. Season Over2.5 rates are 33% for Victoria and 64% for Noteć, and the league has 56% of matches over 2.5; given the combined expected goals of 3.21 I assign Over2.5 a 62% probability and therefore recommend betting Over 2.5 as the optimal line. I rate Over3.5 at about 30% because the projected 3.21 goals leaves limited margin above 3.5 and season Over3.5 rates are 25%/45%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I forecast a draw at half-time followed by a Notec victory (X/2). The home side average 0.42 goals by the break versus 0.7 for the visitors, and in the last five matches Notec scored 9 first-half goals compared to Victoria’s 3, giving the visitors an advantage in the opening phase. Victoria have a higher xG (2.37 vs 1.62) and more shots and shots on target (17.5 and 7.67 vs 13.22 and 5.11), but their low conversion rate of 6% versus Notec’s 13% suggests the hosts may waste many opportunities. Additionally, the hosts have a high proportion of clean halves (42% at half-time) and concede a lot of goals late in the first half (5 goals in minutes 31–45), whereas Notec have better league form (45% wins and 1.55 points per match vs 33% and 1.17 for the hosts), which favors the visitors in the full-time result.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
-1Shots-1
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
-1Shots on target-1
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0xG0
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
-1Corners-1
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0Dangerous attacks0
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
-1Fouls-1
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
-1Cards-1
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
1.13Goals scored / game1.43
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
1.48Goals allowed / game1.48
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
19%Average possession33%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0.22Shots on target / game3.65
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

2.65Shots per game9.39
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0.22Shots on target3.65
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
42.6%Shot conversion15.3%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
19%Possession33%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
1.18xG for1.77
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
1.94xG against1.32
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

Shooting quality

Victoria Września: Counter-attackingNoteć Czarnków: Counter-attacking
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
Accuracy (shots on target)8%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.450.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)5.140.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Noteć Czarnków is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Victoria Września · 1.2 pts / game - Noteć Czarnków

Victoria Września
DLLLW
Season result split
30% W4% D65% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-15
0.96 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 2.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Noteć Czarnków
WLWLL
Season result split
39% W17% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-10
1.35 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Noteć Czarnków is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Victoria Września · 1.43 goals / game - Noteć Czarnków

Victoria Września scoring profile: strong

Victoria Września scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 games), while Noteć Czarnków keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 games).

Noteć Czarnków scoring profile: strong

Noteć Czarnków scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 games), while Victoria Września keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 games).

26Goals scored (season)33
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
34Goals conceded (season)34
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
2.61Average goals per game2.91
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal61%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
30%2 goals43%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
17%3 goals22%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0%4 goals9%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal74%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
52%2 goals39%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
17%3 goals22%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0%4 goals9%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
Victoria Września - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 23 games
51%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time17%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
4%Scored in both halves22%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
60%BTTS - last 520%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Victoria Września is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Victoria Września · 1.04 pts / game - Noteć Czarnków

Victoria Września - half-time state
26% leading39% draw35% trailing
Noteć Czarnków - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.04
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.26
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
57%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
65%No goal before half-time70%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per game (2nd half)1.3
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.39
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
43%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków
74%No goal after half-time52%
Victoria WrześniaNoteć Czarnków

Victoria Września - second-half results

17% W35% D48% L
27
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Noteć Czarnków - second-half results

26% W52% D22% L
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Victoria Września - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Noteć Czarnków - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.40.6
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Victoria Września
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Noteć Czarnków
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
5
9
31-45
8
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.76
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Victoria Września

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Noteć Czarnków

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).

Teams vs league

Victoria WrześniaLigaNoteć Czarnków
Average goals per game▼ 2.612.94• 2.91
Both teams scored▼ 48%51%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 52%56%▼ 48%
Clean sheets▼ 22%28%▼ 26%
Goal before half-time▼ 65%70%• 70%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%72%▼ 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Victoria Września's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Noteć Czarnków. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Noteć Czarnków
0 : 1
Victoria Września

FAQ

What was the result of Victoria Września vs Noteć Czarnków?

The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Victoria Września 0:0 Noteć Czarnków. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Victoria Września vs Noteć Czarnków?

Victoria Września score 1.13 goals per game on average and Noteć Czarnków 1.43. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Victoria Września's matches and 43% of Noteć Czarnków's.

What form are Victoria Września and Noteć Czarnków in?

Over the last 5 games Victoria Września have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Noteć Czarnków 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Victoria Września vs Noteć Czarnków?

The statistical background for Victoria Września vs Noteć Czarnków — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.