Hungary - NB IIData current as of 22 July 2026

Videoton vs Ajka: match statistics

Videoton crest
Videoton
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Ajka crest
Ajka
155%(1.85)
X25%(3.40)
220%(3.60)

Videoton, as the home team, presents solid statistics with a 38% win rate at home and an impressive 63% clean sheets in home matches, indicating a strong defense. The hosts boast a positive goal difference of +4 at their own stadium and a higher xG (1.46) than Ajka's away xG (1.31), suggesting an advantage in creating chances. Ajka displays poor away form with 57% losses and only 0.71 average goals scored away, while also having no draws (0%). The visitors' recent form is better (1.8 PPG), but it mainly concerns home matches, where Ajka feels more confident. Considering Videoton's advantage in home games and Ajka's weaknesses away, the host has a realistic chance of securing three points, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the defensive style of both teams.

Videoton vs Ajka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Videoton play Ajka in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 7 February 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Videoton: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Ajka: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Videoton scores 1.23 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Ajka scores 0.77 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Videoton 47%, Ajka 40%. Over 2.5: Videoton 37%, Ajka 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Videoton has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.27. Videoton: 9.9 shots per match, Ajka: 8.4.

Match halves

Videoton: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.57. Ajka: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Videoton: 46-60 (12 goals). Ajka: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Videoton, as the home team, presents solid statistics with a 38% win rate at home and an impressive 63% clean sheets in home matches, indicating a strong defense. The hosts boast a positive goal difference of +4 at their own stadium and a higher xG (1.46) than Ajka's away xG (1.31), suggesting an advantage in creating chances. Ajka displays poor away form with 57% losses and only 0.71 average goals scored away, while also having no draws (0%). The visitors' recent form is better (1.8 PPG), but it mainly concerns home matches, where Ajka feels more confident. Considering Videoton's advantage in home games and Ajka's weaknesses away, the host has a realistic chance of securing three points, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the defensive style of both teams.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
VideotonAjka
12Shots9
VideotonAjka
2Shots on target2
VideotonAjka
1.15xG0.96
VideotonAjka
12Corners6
VideotonAjka
35Dangerous attacks34
VideotonAjka
18Fouls19
VideotonAjka
1Cards1
VideotonAjka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match0.77
VideotonAjka
1.1Goals conceded / match1.33
VideotonAjka
45%Average possession44%
VideotonAjka
3.4Shots on target / match2.8
VideotonAjka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.93Shots per match8.43
VideotonAjka
3.4Shots on target2.8
VideotonAjka
12.4%Shot conversion9.1%
VideotonAjka
45%Possession44%
VideotonAjka
1.38xG for1.27
VideotonAjka
1.42xG against1.68
VideotonAjka

Shooting quality

Videoton: Counter-attackingAjka: Balanced
VideotonAjka
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Videoton is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Videoton · 0.4 pts / match - Ajka

Videoton
WLLLL
Season result split
33% W30% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Ajka
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W10% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-17
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Videoton is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Videoton · 0.77 goals / match - Ajka

Videoton is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Videoton · 1.33 goals / match - Ajka

Videoton scoring profile: very strong

Videoton scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Ajka keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

Ajka scoring profile: strong

Ajka scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

37Goals scored (season)23
VideotonAjka
33Goals conceded (season)40
VideotonAjka
2.33Average goals in match2.1
VideotonAjka
5Goals scored (last 5)4
VideotonAjka
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
VideotonAjka

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal67%
VideotonAjka
27%2 goals10%
VideotonAjka
10%3 goals0%
VideotonAjka
7%4 goals0%
VideotonAjka

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal73%
VideotonAjka
30%2 goals37%
VideotonAjka
13%3 goals17%
VideotonAjka
0%4 goals7%
VideotonAjka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time13%
VideotonAjka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VideotonAjka
23%Scored in both halves3%
VideotonAjka

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
VideotonAjka
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
VideotonAjka
40%BTTS - last 580%
VideotonAjka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
VideotonAjka
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
VideotonAjka
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
VideotonAjka

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
VideotonAjka
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
VideotonAjka
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
VideotonAjka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Videoton is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Videoton · 1.1 pts / match - Ajka

Videoton - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Ajka - half-time state
23% leading40% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.1
VideotonAjka
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.37
VideotonAjka
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
VideotonAjka
1.1Average goals (1st half)1
VideotonAjka
63%Clean sheet before half-time53%
VideotonAjka
47%No goal before half-time67%
VideotonAjka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1
VideotonAjka
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
VideotonAjka
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
VideotonAjka
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.1
VideotonAjka
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
VideotonAjka
57%No goal after half-time63%
VideotonAjka

Videoton - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
48
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ajka - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Videoton - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ajka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Videoton
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
10
3
31-45
12
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
0
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

Ajka
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
9
31-45
1
8
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Videoton

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ajka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

VideotonLigaAjka
Average goals in match 2.332.51 2.10
Both teams scored 47%48% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%45% 37%
Clean sheets 33%29% 27%
Goal before half-time 73%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 77%80% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Videoton 0 - 1 - 0 Ajka. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Ajka
1 : 1
Videoton FC Fehérvár

FAQ

What was the result of Videoton vs Ajka?

The NB II match finished Videoton 1:0 Ajka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Videoton vs Ajka?

Videoton score 1.23 goals per game on average and Ajka 0.77. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Videoton's matches and 40% of Ajka's.

What form are Videoton and Ajka in?

Over the last 5 games Videoton have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Ajka 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Videoton vs Ajka?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Videoton vs Ajka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.